Regulatory authorities to expose typical false and illegal advertising cases today headlines list

category:Internet
 Regulatory authorities to expose typical false and illegal advertising cases today headlines list


The specific cases of illegal advertising are as follows: 1. Hunan Changsha Food Marketing Co., Ltd. issued illegal advertising case The text and picture content of the 2017 double eleven promotional advertisements published by the parties on the Internet are vulgar and kitsch, which contains no respect for women and sexual hints, violates good social customs, and violates the provisions of the ninth article of the advertising law. In December 2017, the Changsha industrial and commercial bureau made an administrative penalty, fined 600 thousand yuan. 2. Beijing byte jumping Technology Co., Ltd. released illegal advertising cases. The parties operate todays headline mobile app. Since June 2016, the parties have issued a number of medical advertisements which have not obtained the examination of medical advertisements through the headline mobile phone application program, which violates the provisions of the forty-sixth article of the advertising law and constitutes an unlawful act of uncensored and published medical advertisements. In March 2018, the Haidian branch of the Beijing Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce made an administrative penalty, ordered to stop issuing the above content of the illegal advertising, confiscating the advertising fee of 235971.6 yuan and a fine of 707914.8 yuan. 3. Hebei Shijiazhuang seeper medical technology (China) Co., Ltd. issued false false advertising case. The parties themselves design and make an introduction to the advertising brochure of INSEPACK, which is the product of the company, and entrust the Shijiazhuang branch for publicity and release. In the advertisement, the content of the British imported PET raw materials imported from Japan is not in conformity with the objective reality, which violates the sixteenth and twenty-eighth provisions of the advertising law. In November 2017, the Shijiazhuang Changan District Market Supervision Bureau made administrative penalty, ordered the parties concerned to stop illegal advertising activities, eliminate the impact and impose a fine of 1 million yuan. 4. Hebei Qinhuangdao Lai Di Trade Co., Ltd. issued illegal advertising case By issuing the publicity folds to the public, the parties issued advertisements for the publicity of ordinary food, which contained good effects on emphysema, diabetes, tracheitis and other diseases treatment functions, which violated the seventeenth provisions of the advertising law. In October 2017, the Changchun industrial and commercial bureau made administrative penalties, ordered the parties concerned to stop issuing illegal advertisements, and eliminated the impact within the corresponding scope, fined 400 thousand yuan. In the advertisement of health products issued by the parties, the party declared that all the pain can be treated, not drugs, drugs, no side effects, babies and women can be used, the treatment of flying mosquitoes, old flowers, feet, feet, feet, hemorrhoids and other diseases, in violation of the provisions of the seventeenth article of the advertising law. In January 2018, Siping industrial and commercial bureau made administrative penalty, confiscated the advertising fee of 70 thousand yuan, fined 140 thousand yuan, totaling 210 thousand yuan. 6. Shanghai Xiu Chi Industrial Co., Ltd. released false advertising case. The parties issued printed and outdoor advertisements respectively. The advertisement contained the content of extravagance, but it was actually made in the form of billet. The advertisement deceived and misled the consumer, which violated the provisions of the twenty-eighth articles of the advertising law. In February 2018, the Pudong New Area Market Supervision Bureau of Shanghai city made an administrative penalty, fined 854 thousand yuan. 7. Shanghai Jacono Biotechnology Co., Ltd. issued false false advertising case The parties publish a number of advertisements by using the Internet and publicity forms, and advertise the health food, ordinary food and cosmetics sold by them. The non drug propaganda involves the function of the disease treatment, the use of the language confusing with the medicine, the false propaganda, the health effect of the ordinary food and so on, which violates the advertising law. Seventeenth, eighteenth, twenty-eighth regulations. In January 2018, the Pudong New Area market supervision and Administration Bureau of Shanghai City imposed an administrative penalty of 758 thousand and 700 yuan. 8. Shanghai Xin Zhi Yuan Agel Ecommerce Ltd released false advertising case The parties use the Interactive Encyclopedia on the Internet to make publicity, fictitious the relevant contents of the anti aging Holy Scripture, impersonate the salt algae of the hundred years old age hall and the salt algae of the hundred years of age have the clinical medical efficacy; use the own website to fictitious scientific research institutions and scientific research data, and take the 5S of the hundred age hall polar algae to treat the disease. It violates the twenty-eighth provision of the advertising law. In November 21, 2017, the Jingan District market supervision and Administration Bureau of Shanghai City imposed an administrative penalty of 303 thousand and 200 yuan. 9. Zhejiang Ningbo Xiangshan Kun Hong real estate Co., Ltd. released false advertising case. In the advertisement, the party has the content that misleads the purchase object to the original planning and design, and it has a substantial influence on the customers purchase intention. It misleads the consumers seriously and violates the provisions of the twenty-eighth article of the advertising law. In January 2018, the market supervision and Management Department of Xiangshan County, Ningbo, made administrative penalties, ordered the parties to stop issuing false advertisements, and to eliminate the impact in the corresponding range, fined 800 thousand yuan. 10. Anhui Zhi Hu Mdt InfoTech Ltd released illegal advertising case The litigants publish Internet financial advertisements through their own voucher mother website and mobile APP software, which contains the content of more than 14% and so on for the promise of future income, which violates the provisions of the twenty-fifth article of the advertising law. In August 2017, the market supervision bureau of Shushan District of Hefei city made administrative penalty, and ordered the parties to eliminate the impact within the corresponding scope and fined 300 thousand yuan. 11. Anhui Hefei Zhengda Hospital of integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine issued false and illegal medical advertisements The litigants publish medical advertisements through their official website, which contains the content of 3 points of anti-inflammatory, 10 sterilization, no recurrence, treatment of infertility rate of 98% and so on. And in the absence of the Hefei womens Federation and other units authorized by the opening District, the use of womens Federation and the Hefei forum and other media in the name of the public welfare activities, misleading the patient to medical treatment, in violation of the advertising law sixteenth, twenty-eighth and other provisions. In January 2018, the Hefei Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau made an administrative penalty, which ordered the parties to stop issuing false illegal advertisements, eliminate the impact within the corresponding scope, and fined 200 thousand yuan RMB. 12. Fujian Pingtan Strait Ruyi city development and Construction Co., Ltd. issued false advertising case. When the Party issued a real estate advertisement, it marked the bedroom and the balcony as no building area, and publicize the area of the gift. It belongs to the reformed space and so on. It has a substantial influence on the customers purchase intention. It misleads the consumers seriously and violates the provisions of the twenty-eighth articles of the advertising law. In December 2017, the Pingtan comprehensive experimentation area market supervision bureau made an administrative penalty, which ordered the parties to stop issuing illegal advertisements and eliminate the impact within the corresponding range, fined 800 thousand yuan. 13. Hubei Wuhan Oriental Thai hospital limited released false advertising case The parties have issued false illegal advertisements through the Internet, television stations, periodicals, magazines and other media, using the name of the state organs to fabricate activities that do not exist, fictitious medical institutions and award-winning certificates, in violation of the provisions of the twenty-eighth article of the advertising law. In October 2017, the industrial and commercial bureau of the Wuhan economic and Technological Development Zone made an administrative penalty, which ordered the parties to stop issuing illegal advertisements, eliminate the impact within the corresponding scope and impose a fine of 3 million 140 thousand and 500 yuan. 14. Hunan sunrise Oriental Technology Co., Ltd. issued false false advertising case In the advertisement, the parties suggested that the expected returns were guaranteed. The registered trademarks of Sinopec and PetroChina were used in the recommendation of the customers service card business. The customer misunderstood and violated the twenty-fifth and twenty-eighth provisions of the advertising law. In December 2017, the Changsha city commerce and Industry Bureau Kaifu sub bureau made administrative penalties, ordered the parties to stop issuing illegal advertisements and fined 650 thousand yuan. 15. Guangdong radio and television station issued illegal advertisements 16. Guangdong Foshan platinum Sheng Real Estate Co., Ltd. issued false advertising case. The real estate advertisements issued by the parties include exaggerating the volume of commercial housing, building density and other contents, misleading consumers and damaging the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. The above advertisements issued by the parties violate the provisions of the twenty-eighth law of the advertising law. In March 2018, the Bureau of market supervision and administration of Chancheng District, Foshan, made an administrative penalty, ordered the parties to stop issuing false advertisements, and to eliminate the impact within the corresponding scope and fined 300 thousand yuan. 17. Shenzhen Pu Yin block chain Group Co., Ltd. issued illegal advertising cases. The inviting advertisement issued by the parties contains the untrue content of Pu Erh coins creation block chain, which is 3 billion of the existing Tibetan tea as the standard assets. At the same time, it is in violation of the advertising law, fourth and twenty-fifth, to publish the investment advertisement that contains the promise of the promise of future income. Regulationsu3002 In November 2017, the Shenzhen market inspection bureau made an administrative penalty, which ordered the parties to stop issuing illegal advertisements, eliminate the impact within the corresponding scope and impose a fine of 1 million 200 thousand yuan. The advertisement of the party to publicize its deposit financial services contains the contents of the calculation is not calculated, the postal savings are the most cost-effective, a ratio, a calculation, or a more cost-effective postal savings. After investigation, the personal deposit interest rate of the parties is inconsistent with the contents of the publicity, which violates the twenty-eighth provision of the advertising law. In June 2017, the Youyang industrial and commercial bureau of Chongqing city made an administrative penalty, fined 174 thousand yuan. 19. Hainan Sanya sunyang Travel Agency Co., Ltd. released false advertising cases The party publishes the tourism service promotion advertisement on the subscription network platform. The promotion service of the advertisement is not in conformity with the objective actual situation. The parties deceive and mislead the consumers with false or misleading content, which violates the provisions of the twenty-eighth articles of the advertising law. In December 2017, the industrial and commercial bureau of Sanya, Hainan province made an administrative penalty, fined 500 thousand yuan. 20. Qinghai Xining Changhai Hospital issued medical illegal advertising case in July 2017, without examination and approval to produce and release see gynecologic flow to Changhai Hospital medical advertisement, violating the provisions of the advertising law forty-sixth. In November 2017, the Xining Municipal Administration of market supervision imposed an administrative penalty of 150 thousand yuan. Source: Peoples network editor: Bai Xin _NT4464 The party publishes the tourism service promotion advertisement on the subscription network platform. The promotion service of the advertisement is not in conformity with the objective actual situation. The parties deceive and mislead the consumers with false or misleading content, which violates the provisions of the twenty-eighth articles of the advertising law. In December 2017, the industrial and commercial bureau of Sanya, Hainan province made an administrative penalty, fined 500 thousand yuan. The parties in July 2017, without examination and approval of the production and release of see gynecologic flow to Changhai Hospital medical advertisement, violated the advertising law of the forty-sixth provisions. In November 2017, the Xining Municipal Administration of market supervision imposed an administrative penalty of 150 thousand yuan.