The state owned land clearing operation in Hulin started in mid February this year, mainly involving 112 thousand mu of cultivated land of more than 2 thousand farmers in 3 villages and towns. Reporter survey found that some farmers opposed to the harvest, the right of land raised a larger objection, making the operation of the harvest into a passive state. Then, is there any evidence for local state owned land clearing? What is the question of the masses? The villagers took out the approval form of the years reclamation and proved that the reclamation was approved by the government. 35 years of land cultivation will be cleared. Do villagers have legal basis for questioning? Before and after March this year, Jiang Shenghua, a villager in the village of Fu Lu Village, tiger head town, Hulin, suddenly saw a notice posted in the village that the collective land in the village occupied the woodland of tiger head forest farm, and the local government should clear up and recover the 400 mu of cultivated land. This place we have the governments contract warrants, the provincial government issued, covered by the official seal of the tiger head town, the village committee official seal, (before) we give the state agricultural tax, stay, and later we also enjoy (grain) subsidies. Jiang Shenghua said. Jiang Shenghuas land contract management warrant records that the registered dry land is 213.6 mu, and the contract period is from January 1997 to December 2026. This is the second round of rural land contracted villages sent down. In fact, from the first round of land contracting, their families have been farming on this land for 35 years. Jiang Shenghua said that the per mu of land contract certificate and the accounts in the village and the per mu of their actual cultivation are not the same. It is because when the agricultural tax is paid in the year, every household is less reported. Hulin city government posted the state owned land clearance notice in the village. Open up wasteland change illegal reclamation after the new contract differential charges The date of the payment of the Hulin municipal government in February 12th is state-owned land cleaning bulletin, which is decided to carry out special cleaning operations according to law in the whole city, in order to crack down on the illegal destruction of state-owned forest land, wetland and grassland. The reporter visited several villages such as Zhu De mountain village of Hulin Town, Xinhua Village, Baofeng village, Chen-pao Island Township, etc. A number of villagers in the village of Baofeng, Chen-pao Island, took out the approval form, the notice of grain subsidy, the land contract management warrant, and so on, to prove that the land of the village was the collective land of the village, and it was the cultivated land approved by the government. The law of the rural land contract stipulates that it is the county level government that affirms the right of land contractual management. However, there is no official seal of the county government in the hands of the local farmers, only the official seal of the village committee and the township government. A lot of elderly people in the village of ardong Township told reporters that they came to the present villages in the late 70s to respond to the call of the state and set up a point of building wasteland. It took a lot of hardship to put up a lot of manpower and material resources to make the barren land of today become a land of remanding. One of the villagers said, you are now cold and unsuccessful, saying we are unlawfully open the wasteland, we have basically finished in 1997, and we have come to open the wasteland in 1979. One of the old branches of Zhu De mountain village told the Chinese voice reporter that in 1983, after the production to the household, the villagers opened the land in the collective land demarcation, one mu of land to 19.8 yuan for the opening of the waste, finished, the measure to the town government will give you money, 3 years later you pay agricultural tax. The government has an economic management office. The economic management office gives him a warrant, which can be used for bank loans. In order to improve the mechanization of farming, many families are carrying a certain amount of loans. In the view of villagers, if the illegal reclamation of forestland, how will the relevant government departments prove it to the loan? Many villagers also received a notice on the collection of state owned land. The villagers were asked to renew the land contract between the township government and the forest farm within 5 days after receiving the notification and pay the state-owned land for compensation. There is a difference between the early signing and late signing of the fees. Early signing agreements, dry fields are 90 yuan per mu per year, and paddy fields are 180 yuan per mu per year. The villager Jiang Shenghuas house was to be cleared of 400 mu of arable land. He counted the accounts for reporters. There are no more than one mu of land in my family, all of which will be paid for the forest farm, which will be paid eighty thousand annually. Originally, I planted four hundred acres of land, I can receive seven or eighty thousand yuan a year, I give him the contract fee, I basically dry. The villager Wang Zhendongs family is also a similar situation. He said, now the land does not make money, originally a country one mu land, the country back to the money, now we have to give it money, so many bank loans are put into the land. Land collection notice in the hands of the villagers Cross government of woodland and arable land caused by complex history: villagers do not know that ownership has been set in 1996. The idea of the villagers is simple and simple, for decades of land, the second round of the contract period has not arrived, why the land should be collected, want to plant land to re sign the contract, and pay rent? Reporter query documents found that Hulins state-owned land clearing operations, there is a certain policy basis. The woodland contradiction behind it has existed for many years and has a complicated historical background. In 2016, the Heilongjiang provincial government issued the work plan to carry out woodland and wetland clearing and protecting natural ecological resources in the province. The plan is clear, cleaning forestland, wetland is to effectively curb land reclamation, encroachment and other destruction of woodland, wetland behavior, to solve the shortage of ecological construction land, the shortage of forestry development funds and other problems. The plan provides a brief stipulation on the basic principles, scope, main tasks, methods and procedures for cleaning up. The reporter noted that the Heilongjiang provincial government documents asked the provincial government to report to the provincial government by the end of 2016, and the notifications of the Forestry Department of the black dragon province mentioned that the work was completed by the end of 2017 because of the change of personnel. But the city of Hulin began to move forward in February 2018. Liu Mingyang, vice mayor of Hulin, said that there was a clear requirement in all aspects of the work. He said that the State Environmental Supervision Group to Heilongjiang to supervise the problems mentioned, one of which is to strengthen the ecological protection in Heilongjiang Province, but in the development of grain production, the protection of wetlands, grasslands and woodlands is not enough, and the ecological destruction is still frequent. Vice mayor Liu Mingyang said that at the beginning of 1998, governments at all levels had issued a request to stop deforestation and the illegal occupation of woodlands. Hulin was awarded the first batch of national demonstration city of ecological civilization construction last year, and it is more necessary to carry out this work. Now is the common people do not accept, we also know where the focus of the contradiction, there are some long historical problems in this, that is, the village of land and state-owned woodland, grassland have a cross. In an interview with the Chinese voice reporter, the responsible person in the relevant department took out the forest rights certificate in the tiger head forest farm, which was issued by the county government in 1983 and covered with the official seal. But as for the schematic map, the reporter saw that the woodland and the collective land of the village were intersecting with each other. Liu Mingyang, deputy mayor of Hulin, said that several villages and towns in the eastern part of the city decided the village in 1977. At that time, the village was encouraged. By 1983, the land was recognized as cultivated land, and then the woodland and grassland were delimited. In 1983, the common people did not know the situation. The most controversial issue is the land within the village. The people think this is our territory, and the land should be ours. He did not know that the warrant had been issued in 1983 and the grassland certificate was issued in 1996. The signature is the village cadre, then signed a word to cover the chapter, according to the procedure of the certificate at that time, this is the legal authority voucher, you reopen is to destroy the woodland, destroy the grassland. Vice mayor Liu Mingyang said the villagers later had food subsidies, loans and land ownership. When it was issued in 1996, it must be grasslands. In 1983, it must be woodland. It did not become arable land, the mechanical strength developed by the villagers in the later period was strengthened and the momentum of opening the wasteland was increased. At that time, the grain production was encouraged. Then the land and land began to continue, and then open to the woodland again, or to open the grassland again. After 1998, everything was forbidden. Part of it is through the application for land reclamation permit, the application for certification, the state subsidies, there are some without proof, that is, the village agreed to open. The ownership of forest rights and grassland certificates has never changed. Vice mayor Liu Mingyang said that after the State Council banned all deforestation in 1998, the local government has been cracking down on it every year. But the villagers said that for many years, no one had told them that the land had been opened to the forest farm. The local data for Chinas voice is that we need to clear up 112 thousand mu of state owned land, including more than 30 thousand mu of woodland and 82 thousand mu of grassland. It involves more than 2 thousand households. Its a difficult point because of the long history, the wide open range and the number of people involved, Liu Mingyang said. The people think they should be ours. In fact, its not the problem. The state owned land clearing in Hulin involves complicated woodland conflicts. On the one hand, the local villagers believe that the land is not woodland, more than ten years of farming has formed a fact contract relationship. On the other hand, the local government has taken out the forest rights certificate of thirty years ago to recover the land and emphasize the ownership, and the contradiction arises. However, the Hulin municipal governments current solution to contradictions is not recognized by ordinary people, but it has led to a passive situation of clearing work. The time span is so long, and it involves so many farmers vital interests. How should we solve the problem? The voice of China will continue to pay attention. Source: CNG Web Editor: Cao Yi _NN5778 The local data for Chinas voice is that we need to clear up 112 thousand mu of state owned land, including more than 30 thousand mu of woodland and 82 thousand mu of grassland. It involves more than 2 thousand households. Its a difficult point because of the long history, the wide open range and the number of people involved, Liu Mingyang said. The people think they should be ours. In fact, its not the problem. The state owned land clearing in Hulin involves complicated woodland conflicts. On the one hand, the local villagers believe that the land is not woodland, more than ten years of farming has formed a fact contract relationship. On the other hand, the local government has taken out the forest rights certificate of thirty years ago to recover the land and emphasize the ownership, and the contradiction arises. However, the Hulin municipal governments current solution to contradictions is not recognized by ordinary people, but it has led to a passive situation of clearing work. The time span is so long, and it involves so many farmers vital interests. How should we solve the problem? The voice of China will continue to pay attention.