Details of bribery in grass-roots complaints office: dealing with letters and visits and taking care of them first

category:Society click:268
 Details of bribery in grass-roots complaints office: dealing with letters and visits and taking care of them first


The original judgment affirmed that: since August 2000, Peak has been acting as Deputy Director of the Letter and Visit Office of the Land and Resources Bureau of Taihe County. He is specifically responsible for letters, visits, calls registration, transfer and supervision of land and resources of the Bureau. Since 2012, Peak has illegally accepted other peoples property by taking advantage of its position and convenience, and directly or through other national staff for the benefit of others.

Second, at the beginning of 2011, the villagers of Wang Dacun, Fengtai Town, Taihe County, reflected the land problem of the original Fengtai tobacco station to the peak, and in March of that year, Guan Mou came out and sent the peak cash of 20,000 yuan, so that they could take care of it. After the peak, he issued a 20000 yuan debit to the customs office and promised to help. In October 2015, because the entrusted items have not been completed, Guan asked for 20,000 yuan from Gaofeng by SMS, and Gaofeng returned 10,000 yuan to Guan on November 1, 2015.

Thirdly, in 2012, Yang Mou, a teacher of No. 2 Middle School in Taihe County, built a house on the original wall set of Yuanqiang Town in Taihe County and had a land dispute with the surrounding people. The letter and visit office of the Land and Resources Bureau of Taihe County intervened in the settlement. During Peaks involvement in the investigation, Yang Mou offered to Peak that he would like to be taken care of and given 5,000 yuan in cash. Peak took over and made profit for Yang Mou.

Fourthly, in the spring of 2012, Chen Mou, a villager in Chengzhai Village, Chengguan Town, Taihe County, was petitioned because of disputes between the leased land and the surrounding people, and the petition Office of the Land and Resources Bureau of Taihe County intervened. Peak participated in the investigation process to provide help to Chen, after borrowing 5,000 yuan from Chen, and said that the return. Later, Chen thanked Gaofeng for his help in letters and visits. He said in his office that the 5000 yuan did not need to be returned. Gaofeng defaulted and has not yet returned it.

Fifthly, in November 2015, Guo Mou (whose specific name is unknown) was ordered to close the kiln factory in Lixing Town, Taihe County due to illegal production. Guomou entrusted Zhengmou with 10,000 yuan cash to Gaofeng. He hoped that Gaofeng would help him to say hello and postpone the closure of the kiln factory. Peak promised to help Guo after receiving the paragraph. He planned to seek illegitimate interests for Guo through other state staff, but failed to do so and did not return the money.

The Fuyang intermediate peoples court affirmed the facts and evidence affirmed by the first instance.

According to the Criminal Decision of the Second Instance of Peak Bribery, it was found that from 2011 to 2015, Peak illegally accepted 45,000 yuan of cash from Zheng, Guan, Yang, Chen and Guo in the process of dealing with the cases of letters and visits related to land and resources by taking advantage of his position as deputy director of the letters and visits office of Taihe County Land and Resources Bureau. The fact that all the stolen money was withdrawn after the case was committed and the crime constituted a success was exposed has been confirmed by the evidence of proof and cross-examination in the first trial. During the second instance, neither Peak nor his defender nor Fuyang Peoples Procuratorate put forward new facts and evidence affecting the conviction and sentencing of this case. Therefore, the facts and evidence identified in the first instance were confirmed by Fuyang Intermediate Peoples Court. Fuyang Intermediate Peoples Court held that the appellant, as a national staff member, took advantage of his position as deputy director of the office of letters and visits of Taihe County Land and Resources Bureau, illegally accepted 45,000 yuan of other peoples property, with a large amount of money, in order to seek benefits for others, and his actions constituted the crime of accepting bribes and should be punished according to law. The original judgment is clear, the evidence is accurate and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, the sentencing is appropriate, and the trial procedure is legal. The Fuyang peoples Procuratorate rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment. Accordingly, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (1) of Article 225 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the Peoples Republic of China, the following rulings are made: rejecting the appeal and upholding the original sentence, i.e. sentencing to four monthsdetention, six months probation and a fine of RMB 100,000 yuan. The source of this article: surging news editor: Qian Yue Xiao _NBJ10675

According to the Criminal Decision of the Second Instance of Peak Bribery, it was found that from 2011 to 2015, Peak illegally accepted 45,000 yuan of cash from Zheng, Guan, Yang, Chen and Guo in the process of dealing with the cases of letters and visits related to land and resources by taking advantage of his position as deputy director of the letters and visits office of Taihe County Land and Resources Bureau. The fact that all the stolen money was withdrawn after the case was committed and the crime constituted a success was exposed has been confirmed by the evidence of proof and cross-examination in the first trial. During the second instance, neither Peak nor his defender nor Fuyang Peoples Procuratorate put forward new facts and evidence affecting the conviction and sentencing of this case. Therefore, the facts and evidence identified in the first instance were confirmed by Fuyang Intermediate Peoples Court.

Fuyang Intermediate Peoples Court held that the appellant, as a national staff member, took advantage of his position as deputy director of the office of letters and visits of Taihe County Land and Resources Bureau, illegally accepted 45,000 yuan of other peoples property, with a large amount of money, in order to seek benefits for others, and his actions constituted the crime of accepting bribes and should be punished according to law. The original judgment is clear, the evidence is accurate and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, the sentencing is appropriate, and the trial procedure is legal. The Fuyang peoples Procuratorate rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment. Accordingly, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (1) of Article 225 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the Peoples Republic of China, the following rulings are made: rejecting the appeal and upholding the original sentence, i.e. sentencing to four monthsdetention, six months probation and a fine of RMB 100,000 yuan.