City Management Bureau Planning squadron captain to accept the sealing fee allowed to create fraud.

category:Society click:529
 City Management Bureau Planning squadron captain to accept the sealing fee allowed to create fraud.


But to the surprise of buyers, there are only seven floors in the plan of this hot-selling commodity building, eight floors to seventeen floors are all illegal! What is more inconceivable is that the building has all the relevant procedures such as construction project planning permit and commercial house pre-sale permit when it is sold! Recently, a criminal judgment was issued by a Chinese judgment document. The final statement reveals the details of the case of the developers and state staff colluding to forge official documents and certificates of state organs during the construction and sale of the building.

Received the closure fee, the planning squadron leader of the Urban Management Bureau was allowed to run illegally.

According to the judgment, the defendant, Li Mou, served as the squadron leader of the planning squadron of the three teams of Huanggang City Administration and Law Enforcement Bureau from December 2010 to March 2012 and was also in charge of the special class for violation detection. At that time, he was mainly responsible for the planning, law enforcement and violation detection of the high-tech industrial park.

In August 2011, the project of Boda Youth City, developed by Huanggang Boda Real Estate Co., Ltd., began to violate the planning permission to build the eighth floor. During the daily inspection, Li Mou immediately found the illegal behavior of Boda Youth City.

At this time, Xu Mou, general manager and actual controller of Boda Real Estate Co., Ltd., in order to smoothly build the Boda Youth City project, gave Li Mou 30,000 yuan. After receiving the money, Li Mou failed to fulfill his duty to investigate and punish the illegal construction of the company, nor did he report to the leaders of the unit and let the companys illegal construction go. Behavior.

In mid-late December 2011, when the Boda Youth City project reached the thirteenth floor, the masses reported that it was over-planned, and the project was forced to shut down. At this time, Li Mou, the leader of the planning squadron, was afraid of being held accountable, so he proposed to resign from the planning squadron.

Fines 500 thousand, forged planning permits, and 17 floors illegally completed and sold out.

According to the testimony of Xu Mou, general manager of Huanggang Boda Real Estate, when the construction of Boda Youth City started in 2011, in August, when the eighth floor was built, Li Mou said that the illegal construction required the shutdown, and he gave Li Mou 30,000 yuan, asking for care and not to investigate and punish, and allowing the building to continue. In December 2011, when the Boda Youth City was built to the 13th floor, it was reported that after a fine of 500,000 yuan, the City Administration and Law Enforcement Bureau continued to build until the completion of the project in 2012.

Since then, Xu instructed Zhu Mou, an employee of the company, to forge Jianzi GJ2011-63 and Construction Project Planning License (copy). The permit records that the construction layer is 1+17F and the total construction area is 7750 square meters. In May 2012, Huanggang Boda Real Estate Co., Ltd. handled the pre-sale license of commercial housing through the use of false planning permits and other materials.

By the time of the case, all seventeen-storey houses in Boda Youth City had been sold out. Later, many owners were told that they could not handle relevant documents because of the illegal construction of the seventh-storey buildings in Boda Youth City, which caused bad social impact.

The squadron leader who has resigned has asked for help to make a false registration of the ownership of the house.

Although the sale has been sold out, the crime of falsifying official documents and documents of state organs is continuing. The judgment shows that between the end of 2014 and 2015, Huanggang Boda Real Estate Co., Ltd. will apply for housing ownership registration in Boda Youth City. The application for housing ownership registration requires the approval documents of the Development and Reform Bureau of Huangzhou District and the Construction Project Planning License (original). Because the project of Boda Youth City has not been approved and filed by the Development and Reform Bureau of Huangzhou District, the defendant Xu Mou instructed Zhu Mou to make a reply. Since then, Zhu Mou forged a document entitled Huang Fa Reform [2011] 39, which is about the approval of the real estate development project of Huanggang Boda Youth City.

In addition, because it also needs the Construction Project Planning License (original) to apply for housing ownership registration, Xu Mou paid Li Mou, the former squadron leader who had helped him in the planning squadron. Since then, Li Mou found the defendant Shao Mou, who conspired to forge the Jianzi SJ2011-63 and Construction Project Planning License (original), which recorded the construction scale of 17F+1, with a total area of 7750 square meters.

Thereafter, Shao Mou, who acted as the agent for the registration of housing ownership, used the forged document and other materials provided by Huanggang Boda Real Estate Co., Ltd. to register the housing property rights of the Boda Youth City Project with the Huanggang Housing Authority.

Shao Mou confessed that Li first handed him the relevant materials made before Boda Youth City. He looked at the fake planning certificate and returned the materials. Then, through the advertisement of certification on the wall of the community, he found someone to run a copy of the Construction Project Planning License. Shao Mou took the original and photocopies of the materials for handling the real estate certificate to the Housing Administration for processing the real estate certificate, and the staff returned the original.

After receiving the materials returned, Lee destroyed the original construction project planning permit.

Four employees were sentenced to jail for employee involvement.

On May 24, 2017, the subordinate of Xu Mou, general manager of Boda Real Estate, Zhu Mou, who once helped him to fake, voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs. After that, Xu and Shao were arrested. Li was also arrested at the door of the Huanggang Discipline Inspection Commission in May 13, 2017.

The appraisal opinions of accounting firms show that the sales revenue of the additional part of Boda Youth City is 19930837.61 yuan, the development cost is 12484979.26 yuan, the tax and period cost are 3105642.87 yuan, and the net income of the additional part is 4340215.48 yuan.

After trial, the court held that Xu Mou ordered Zhu Mou, the defendant, to forge copies of construction project planning license and project approval in order to handle the pre-sale license of commercial housing and the registration of ownership of housing in Boda Youth City. The acts of the two defendants constituted the crime of forging official documents and documents of state organs. In order to register the ownership of houses in Boda Youth City, the defendants, Li Mou and Shao Mou, forged the original license of construction project planning. The acts of the two defendants constitute the crime of forging the documents of state organs.

As a state functionary, the defendant, Li Mou, for personal gain, did not conscientiously perform his duties after receiving Xu Mous 30,000 yuan cash, did not investigate and help to conceal violations of construction, resulting in heavy losses to the state and bad social impact. His actions constituted bribery and dereliction of duty, respectively. The defendant, Li Mou, who commits the crime of forging documents of state organs, accepting bribes and neglecting his duty, shall be punished in accordance with the law for several crimes.

The defendant Zhu Mou has the circumstances of voluntary surrender and can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment. He plays a minor role in the joint crime and is an accomplice. He should be given a lighter or mitigated punishment. Finally, Xu was convicted of forging official documents and documents of state organs and sentenced to one year and six monthsimprisonment, two years probation and a fine of 50,000 yuan. Li Mou was sentenced to one years imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 yuan for forging documents of state organs; two yearsimprisonment for negligence of duty; four months imprisonment for bribery and a fine of 100,000 yuan. Decided to carry out fixed-term imprisonment in two years and six months, and fined one hundred and ten thousand yuan. Shao Mou was convicted of forging documents of state organs and sentenced to one years imprisonment, one year and six monthsprobation and a fine of 30,000 yuan. Zhu was guilty of forgery of official documents and certificates of state organs, and he was sentenced to six months control and a penalty of five thousand yuan. The source of this article: the author of the reading Bureau: Pang Lans responsible editor: Ji Guo Jie _NBJ11143

The defendant Zhu Mou has the circumstances of voluntary surrender and can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment. He plays a minor role in the joint crime and is an accomplice. He should be given a lighter or mitigated punishment.

Finally, Xu was convicted of forging official documents and documents of state organs and sentenced to one year and six monthsimprisonment, two years probation and a fine of 50,000 yuan.

Li Mou was sentenced to one years imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 yuan for forging documents of state organs; two yearsimprisonment for negligence of duty; four months imprisonment for bribery and a fine of 100,000 yuan. Decided to carry out fixed-term imprisonment in two years and six months, and fined one hundred and ten thousand yuan.

Shao Mou was convicted of forging documents of state organs and sentenced to one years imprisonment, one year and six monthsprobation and a fine of 30,000 yuan.

Zhu was guilty of forgery of official documents and certificates of state organs, and he was sentenced to six months control and a penalty of five thousand yuan.