After the old customers ordered 65 cup of coffee, they lost their running errands, and the little brother was cheated 920 yuan.

category:Global
 After the old customers ordered 65 cup of coffee, they lost their running errands, and the little brother was cheated 920 yuan.


Female customers ordered 65 cups of Starbucks coffee 2080 yuan, and borrow 920 yuan to buy crayfish, Mr. Liu, happy to get to the destination, waiting for a 3000 yuan cash. Let Mr. Liu heart plug, the female customer said the company has not only moved away, she herself disappeared. 3000 yuan was beaten, but in desperation, Mr. Liu turned to the Xiaoxiang Morning Post reporter. On 4 23, the Starbucks coffee shop in Wanda Plaza, Changsha, the reporter saw Mr. Liu who was working on errands. Usually to help the guests buy Starbucks coffee. Mr. Liu told reporters that on 4 19, he received a big bill. He met the customer from the US platform last year. He had traded before, and later added WeChat. This time, the female customer ordered a 65 cup of coffee. When Mr. Liu came to the company with the coffee, she found that the room was empty. The female customer who ordered the order had no news after several phone calls. Incident: 65 cup of coffee lost couplet, also set off the 920 yuan In the afternoon of April 19th, a female customer WeChat contacted Mr. Liu, saying that their group made a tea party on the afternoon of 20, and needed to reserve a large number of Starbucks coffee, a total of 65 cups of caramel martdo, a total of 2080 yuan. Mr. Liu, with his coffee, came to the address that the female customer said - Hunan Yong male Asset Management Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Yong Xiong), and saw the scene that made him foolish: the company has closed the door. I called her and sent messages, and I kept flickering, saying, wait 10 minutes. After about 20 minutes, the phone was no longer answered. Mr. Liu said that after the incident, he told police at Pozi Street police station. After hearing the basic situation, the police thought it was a consumer dispute and suggested that he should report it to the business department. Eyewitness: at 12 in the evening, no one came to bring a coffee On 4 23, the reporter came to Mr. Lius company. The door was closed, next to Jingjiang Oriente Hotel. Ms. Wu, a receptionist at the hotel, said she was on duty on the evening of 20. The man arrived before 7 oclock in the evening and has been waiting here for a long time. After waiting for a long time, Mr. Liu and another man did not take the coffee away. At 12 oclock in the evening, no one came to pick up the coffee. Ms. Wu called Mr. Liu to ask how to deal with it. He said he would not come and get it. It was raining and the coffee was dirty there. After that, the 65 cup of coffee was processed by the hotel staff themselves. In fact, she just deceived me 920 yuan to say well, but why do you want to cheat me to buy 65 cups of coffee? lost 3000 yuan of Mr. Lius heart not Gandhi said, the day bought 65 cups of coffee, delivery emptiness, and finally wait until 9 oclock in the evening to give up, a total of 5 hours, I have a lot of things, I have a lot of things, I have a lot of no answer. Ms. Wu said that the assets of Yong Xiong had been rented for some time, but moved away a few days ago. Company: the employee who is leaving the company will urge him to pay it back In 2017, Mr. Liu engaged in errands business on the US regiment. I know this woman customer who claims to work in Yong Xiong assets. What is the name of a single female customer? Is it a permanent employee? Mr. Liu is not sure. She used to let us put the coffee in front of the front desk. I didnt see myself. On the 23 day, Mr. Liu tried to send a message to the female customer and found that he had been blacken. The reporter tried to call the female customers phone, one of which was never connected, and the other was the blank number. Next, the reporter tried to add WeChat, which was not verified before the press release. On the evening of 23 10, Li Xiang, director of the assets of Wing Hung, contacted reporters and told the customers that he was a company employee, but he left in 2017. According to the companys investigation, the employee had been unable to contact the phone though he was under investigation in Shanghai. We are urging this person to let her pay the money quickly, not to quit her job, and to do the same thing in the name of the company. The company will make every effort to help Mr. Liu pursue debts. In addition, Li Xiang said that the companys future large gatherings will give priority to taking care of Mr. Lius business. viewpoint Where a crime of fraud has not been reached, it may be resolved through civil action. Liu Ming, executive director of Hunan Rui Bang law firm, believes that the behavior of this customer is not yet a crime of fraud. According to the relevant provisions of the criminal law, the crime of fraud refers to the act of fraudulent public and private property with the purpose of illegal possession, using fictitious facts or concealment of the truth. The suspect of fraud should take illegal possession as the purpose. In this case, the customer ordered coffee of 2080 yuan but did not want it. The purpose was not to illegally occupy the coffee. Of course, the behavior of cheating 920 yuan red packets is suspected of fraud, but it is not a crime of fraud because it can not reach the point of legal fraud. According to the provisions of the law on punishment for public security administration, theft, fraud, robbery, robbery, extortion, or intentional damage to public and private property are detained below 5 days and less than 10 days, and may be fined below 500 yuan; the circumstances are more serious and are detained below 10 days and less than 15 days, and may be fined below 1000 yuan. Although the suspects behavior does not constitute a crime, he still has fraud. The victim can report to the public security organ, and the public security organ carries out the public security punishment. And for the total loss of 2080 yuan of coffee, it is a civil dispute. In the case of retaining the relevant evidence and investigating the parties, it can be solved through civil litigation. The suspect of fraud should take illegal possession as the purpose. In this case, the customer ordered coffee of 2080 yuan but did not want it. The purpose was not to illegally occupy the coffee. Of course, the behavior of cheating 920 yuan red packets is suspected of fraud, but it is not a crime of fraud because it can not reach the point of legal fraud. According to the provisions of the law on punishment for public security administration, theft, fraud, robbery, robbery, extortion, or intentional damage to public and private property are detained below 5 days and less than 10 days, and may be fined below 500 yuan; the circumstances are more serious and are detained below 10 days and less than 15 days, and may be fined below 1000 yuan. Although the suspects behavior does not constitute a crime, he still has fraud. The victim can report to the public security organ, and the public security organ carries out the public security punishment. And for the total loss of 2080 yuan of coffee, it is a civil dispute. In the case of retaining the relevant evidence and investigating the parties, it can be solved through civil litigation.