After 1 years from the Beijing account, the graduate court sentenced the compensation unit to 310 thousand.

category:Society click:395
 After 1 years from the Beijing account, the graduate court sentenced the compensation unit to 310 thousand.


On the morning of October 31, the Tongzhou court disclosed that the personnel dispute case had been settled. The court sentenced Liang to pay a school liquidated damages of 110,000 yuan and a talent introduction fee of 200,000 yuan.

Beijing Evening News WeChat public figure

In August 2015, Liang Mou, a university graduate, came to a school smoothly to be a physics teacher. He had a career establishment and obtained a residence registration in Beijing. Liang and the school signed a contract of employment from August 1, 2015 to July 31, 2022.

However, only a year later, Liang resigned and worked for another job. When the summer vacation ended in 2016, when Liang started school in September, Liang did not work again.

The school applied to the Beijing Tongzhou District Labor Dispute Arbitration Commission for arbitration and asked Liang to pay the breach of contract damages (breach of contract damages of 110,000 yuan, talent introduction fee of 200,000 yuan). The Arbitration Commission supported the request of the school. Liang refused to accept the arbitration result and filed a lawsuit with the Tongzhou court. During the trial, Liang said that he was a fresh graduate, different from the general introduction of super-level and backbone teachers from other provinces and cities, and did not belong to the provisions of the talent introduction personnel, and the employment contract stipulated 110,000 yuan liquidated damages are too high, far higher than his school income. After trial, the court held that the agreement on liquidated damages between the two parties was very clear and specific, the plaintiff should be aware of the consequences of the breach, and the supplementary terms of the employment contract signed by the two parties were true, which was the true intention of both parties, and did not violate laws and regulations, should be legal and effective, and both parties should abide by it. To this end, the court made the decision. Source: Beijing evening news editor: Guo Ping _B7442

The school applied to the Beijing Tongzhou District Labor Dispute Arbitration Commission for arbitration and asked Liang to pay the breach of contract damages (breach of contract damages of 110,000 yuan, talent introduction fee of 200,000 yuan). The Arbitration Commission supported the request of the school. Liang refused to accept the arbitration result and filed a lawsuit with the Tongzhou court.

After trial, the court held that the agreement on liquidated damages between the two parties was very clear and specific, the plaintiff should be aware of the consequences of the breach, and the supplementary terms of the employment contract signed by the two parties were true, which was the true intention of both parties, and did not violate laws and regulations, should be legal and effective, and both parties should abide by it.

To this end, the court made the decision.