Director of public relations circle of friends sun employees wages company claims its leakage claim 50 thousand

category:Global
 Director of public relations circle of friends sun employees wages company claims its leakage claim 50 thousand


The plaintiff company said Ms. Guan used to be the PR director of the company and was responsible for the operation of new media. When both parties signed a labor contract, the two parties signed a confidentiality agreement, which agreed that wage compensation belonged to business secrets, and the lady had the obligation to confidentiality, and the period of secrecy had a corresponding agreement. In November 2015, the company terminates the labor contract with Ms. Guan. Since then, the company was dissatisfied with the company on the issue of wages. In October 11, 2017, Ms Guan issued three employees salary data on its WeChat friend circle, while the employees wages were kept secret between the financial and senior leaders. Ms. Guans behavior seriously violated the companys business secrets. To this end, the court told the court to stop the infringement, delete friends involved in the trade secret content, compensation for economic losses of 50 thousand yuan. In the trial, the plaintiff company pointed out that because the wages of the same industry are confidential, the leakage of wages will affect the competitiveness of the company. Ms. Guan said she was only one person at the time, and she was responsible for editing the contents of the public, and she had not touched the salary information of other employees in the work. Later, she filed a labor arbitration lawsuit with a plaintiff, and some colleagues showed her that they had a problem with their wages, so they issued relevant friends circles. At present, the information involved in the case has been deleted. I didnt get any benefit. No one asked me for information after that. Ms. Guan also said that the actual wages of the three employees were different from those issued by her. And wages do not belong to business secrets. Business secrets should be confidential, confidential and practical. They do not constitute infringement. But the company said that the figures released by Ms. Guan were the actual income of the employees involved. The case will be sentenced on a day of date. Source: Beijing Morning Post writer: Yan Fei editor in charge: Zhu Xiaodong _NBJS6126 In the trial, the plaintiff company pointed out that because the wages of the same industry are confidential, the leakage of wages will affect the competitiveness of the company. Ms. Guan said she was only one person at the time, and she was responsible for editing the contents of the public, and she had not touched the salary information of other employees in the work. Later, she filed a labor arbitration lawsuit with a plaintiff, and some colleagues showed her that they had a problem with their wages, so they issued relevant friends circles. At present, the information involved in the case has been deleted. I didnt get any benefit. No one asked me for information after that. Ms. Guan also said that the actual wages of the three employees were different from those issued by her. And wages do not belong to business secrets. Business secrets should be confidential, confidential and practical. They do not constitute infringement. But the company said that the figures released by Ms. Guan were the actual income of the employees involved. The case will be sentenced on a day of date.