Zong Qinghou: a vice president of Tsinghua University is unable to afford a mortgage.

category:Internet
 Zong Qinghou: a vice president of Tsinghua University is unable to afford a mortgage.


Source: Niu Ye Jing Wen / original grass At the weekend, after listening to a 2018 World CEO development conference, Zong Qinghou, chairman of Wahaha Group, exposed a great surprise. The chief executive of West Lake University, Shi Yi Gong, resigned to vice president of Tsinghua University, mainly because of too little income. This is the leader of this discipline. Tsinghua University receives 480 thousand annual salary. But a public two children, all in school, a year to spend 600 thousand, a male is still in Beijing loans to buy a house, the need to return home loans, children school fees, plus family expenses, Tsinghua pay far can not solve the needs of life, housing loans are not up to the point. So he came to the University of West Lake. How much money did West Lake university give, Zong Qinghou did not disclose. However, as a specially approved private university, there must be no shortage of money. Many domestic business leaders have pledged, such as Wanda Wang Jianlin, Tencent Ma Huateng, Longhu real estate Wu Yajun, vill capital Zhang Lei, northern Aurora venture capital founder Deng Feng, Hikvision Gong Hongjia, Hongkong Jiali groups Guo foundation, and so on, all gave West Lake university a lot of donations. The light town and the foundation support 300 million yuan. In addition, the Hangzhou municipal government also provides 100 million support funds for each project sponsored by the four subject leaders of the University of West Lake, with the right to dominate all the leaders in these disciplines. Therefore, it is certain that Shi Yi Gong left Qinghua University to West Lake University, and the problem of money is basically not a problem. Of course, as a scientist, we cant measure the amount of money, but scientists are also people, and we have to keep a family. Without money, it is impossible. As a well-known international scientist, the academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the National Outstanding Youth Foundation, the first batch of national special experts, the Princeton University tenured professor of the United States, the state is given a 480 thousand year, is it a little cold? Its not that the state cant afford the money. How can it make people live a decent life? Today, the reason why we talk about Shi Gong is mainly about the thought of Chinas scientific research system triggered by ZTEs ban. While we rebuke the US imperialists for their difficulties and immorality, we must think about what problems we have ourselves. Does it make sense for the party to rely on Hu Xijin? What is the meaning of empty talk, which depends on shouting war to stop, to accompany the end and to fight between China and the United States not to do business? Like that, Im ZTE tonight. Im holding an Apple phone in my hands. In reflecting on the issue of ZTE, we must never go from one extreme to another. All of the core equipment was imported before, and now it is easy to be stuck by people. It is not wrong to emphasize self-reliance, emphasize independent innovation and emphasize the master of core science and technology, but we can not make independent innovation to close the country, not to be closed, but to open our hearts and learn more from other countries to truly strengthen ourselves. Only by constantly opening up and going out to do business with others can we learn from others. Todays public opinion is left to right and right, up and down, for a moment, advocating openness, and then advocating all autonomy. This is a big problem. Why can China engage in missile nuclear bombs? Because we used the Tsien Hsueshen Qian Sanqiang and other talents to study abroad, most of the people studying abroad before the Republic of China have open mind, so they can achieve such achievements. As Ren Zhengfei said, no opening is death. If we do not learn from the American people about their greatness, we will never conquer the United States. Fortunately, this is said by Ren Zhengfei. The HUAWEI he founded has made it very strong and convincing. If it is not said, it will be scolded by many sprayer as traitor. Backwardness is not fearful. We are afraid that we are lagging behind and still closed, making the whole world an enemy. Of course, the world follows the law of the jungle, of course, only the winner can make rules, which is not fair, but it is not fair, but you need to be strong, first of all, to participate and adapt to this set of rules, to do business and trade within the existing rules, and to accumulate the capital slowly. And the formulation of the new rules. For ZTE, it is better to solve some problems of yourself than to waste words on others. There are many problems in the research system, the protection of intellectual property rights and the atmosphere of the whole society. A real estate can have huge wealth, one can earn millions by singing a few songs, and an economy that even the top chief scientists cant survive. Is it not a problem in the middle? The following is an excerpt from Ren Zhengfeis interview 6 years ago. Now it seems to be a foresight! Please pay special attention to what he said: we must not have a narrow sense of pride. This sense of pride will kill us. Our purpose is to earn money, we must take the upper ridge. You cant take the upper mountain, and take the Wall Street. Lets not be narrow minded. We have the same operating principle as the high-end chip. It is mainly for others to allow us to use, rather than breaking our food. When we break our grain, backup system can be used. This is a very philosophical saying: HUAWEI makes its own chip, and does its own operating system, but it still takes a lot of money to buy other peoples chips and systems. Why? Because other people are advanced. So why do you want to develop it again? Because of their own research and development is to allow others to allow us to use! In other words, if you dont have your own R & D and substitutes, you may not have the right to use other peoples products. This is the case at present. Ren Zhengfei: if we do not learn the greatness of the United States, we will never overcome them. In the year of Great China (dragon, Datang, ZTE, HUAWEI), there was only one HUAWEI family that could be proud of its reputation. There are many reasons for this. It is undeniable that Ren Zhengfei played a very important role in it. Whether or not you recognize HUAWEIs corporate culture, HUAWEI has been breaking through itself and challenging its limits. Ren Zhengfeis speech was very frank, real and insightful. This article is a dialogue between Ren Zhengfei and 2012 laboratories and scientific and technological personnel. In this time why the national reflection is lacking in core, this dialogue is worth reading. The real way out: Reread Ren Zhengfeis 2012 lab speech Without the protection of property rights, the impulse to innovate will be suppressed. Question: one of the themes youve just said is innovation. We all know that we havent produced a Nobel prize until now. I want to see from this point of view how we HUAWEI come to innovation, to listen to your point of view, why we have not yet a Nobel prize in China until now. What is the necessary condition? Ren Zhengfei: Hongkong, I think it is a place where Tibetan dragon lies in the tiger. Many people in Hongkong come back from Europe and America to study mainly in teaching, so the quality of education in Hongkong is very good. I have repeatedly told the government of Guangdong that schools in Hongkong should be allowed to set up schools in the hinterland of the mainland and Guangdong to release their teachers energy. I will not talk about winning the Nobel prize. The important thing is how to create the value of human beings. China can not create value because it lacks soil. This soil is the property right protection system. In Silicon Valley, everyone worked overtime and might get rich overnight. I have a good friend, when I went to the United States, his company was bigger than us. He had the idea of getting rich overnight, and he didnt get rich in more than 20 years. Millions of people like him may have struggled for the life of human society, and could squeeze one persons success, that is, Jobs, that is Facebook. That is to say, the property protection system allows everyone to see the possibility of getting rich overnight. Without the protection of property rights, the impulse to innovate will be suppressed. The second reason is that China lacks tolerance, and people do not harm you. Why do you care so much about people? You see, now some people on the Internet spit on good people. Do those good people dare to be outstanding? We do not have a clear system of property rights protection and do not have a spirit of tolerance, so China has obstacles in the issue of innovation. We also know that Facebook, it can appear, is not great. If this thing appeared in China, it could be copied and copied many times, not to say that the original person would be abandoned, even the first plagiarism would be broken and abandoned. In the United States, there is a strict intellectual property protection system. You cant copy it. If you copy it, you will be fined billions of dollars. Anyone who knows such a strict system of protection knows no violation of others. In fact, the protection of intellectual property rights is our own needs, not the means that others have used to suppress us. If this is realized, the technology of our country in the past few decades and hundreds of years will be hopeful. But science and technology is not a matter of quick success and instant benefit. A theoretical breakthrough requires twenty or thirty years to contribute to social value. When Jacob broke through CDMA, it was 60s, when we were engaged in the cultural revolution. How can we see that Qualcomm is making money, and we feel sorry that we are not Qualcomm? Twenty or thirty years ago, we were still engaged in Wen Wei Wei, the cultural revolution that time, still feel who read, who stupid, so we calm down today, do some things, and maybe forty or fifty years later we have hope. But we cant calm down now. Why? Fortunately you are a university professor in Hongkong, not a university professor in the mainland of China. Otherwise, if you are more than the number of papers and you cant produce so much, you can only copy. What Nobel prize do you have to copy the paper? Impossible, so we have to change the academic environment. Question: the vigorous development of the high-tech industry in the United States depends mainly on intellectual property protection and venture capital. Now we see the investment fund of the chip is getting bigger and bigger, but our past chip investment mainly depends on the product line, the pressure of the current profit of the product line is especially big, so the chip investment that can not see the obvious profit in the short term is more and more hesitant, can I ask the general in this respect can give us some guidance, we have no wind How to balance the contradiction between long-term investment and short-term interest in the case of venture capital? Ren Zhengfei: if he does not see clearly in short-term investment and long-term interests, he is not a general. The general must have strategic consciousness and no strategic sense. This is the first question. The second question is also about the dissipative structure. In fact, the HUAWEI company is in a relatively good period. It should increase its input and dissipate these advantages and form a new advantage. The whole society is declining, the economy may be recessions, and we have fallen in comparison with our own past, but we live very well compared to the next, and we will have a pure profit of $20-30 billion this year. Therefore, investment in the future can not be soft. Afraid to use money is our lack of leaders, lack of generals and lack of strategy for the future. HUAWEI can go from thirty agents and forty analog switches to today. Without generals long-term vision, we can not go to today. Why do we not get the general after our successor? It is a problem of cultural mechanism and assessment mechanism. So we held an afternoon in the organizational reform conference held in Guangzhou. Hu Houkun finally said a word that our interest mechanism should be changed from granting to acquisition, and that the award is on us to comment on how much money you have for him, and everyone wants to take more money. In the future we change to get and share. That is to say, the whole assessment mechanism should be reversed and centered on interests. Why we have such a huge agency, because the organs to divide money, the organization to keep a piece of themselves, their own hair good, the wages also rose well, the rest of the Afghan brothers, the result they can not get much. In that case, it is a mechanism that can not encourage the generation of heroes and can not generate a strategic mechanism, so we have to adjust now. In this transitional period of adjustment, we call for more strategic people to go to management posts. We see the problem in the long run. Today we are gambling. Gambling is a strategic vision. What do we bet on? The gambling pipeline will be as thick as the Pacific Ocean. Is it possible for us to achieve the traffic system in the Pacific? Let me give an example to illustrate: for example, the competition between Airbus and Boeing, Boeing assumes that the world is a network world, a point-to-point flight, so that there is no need for a hub to go straight to the small city, so Boeing does not make a large airliner, Boeing improves on small point, point to point. Thats oku3002 Airbus is supposed to be a hub type. When Frankfurt first sits on a large plane and then transfers to a small aircraft, the three hundred aircraft will come out first. Today we have to assume what the future architecture is. If we assume that we are not clear, we are gambling on the future, that is, bet on the bandwidth. We dont have advanced weapons. We cant chop off Scud with big knife and spear. We need something to deal with him. We do not expect to have wise leaders. We are all working together to promote a strategic vision. Disconnect the grain and use the backup system Question: currently in the terminal OS field, Android, iOS, WindowsPhone8 tripartite, forming their respective ecosystems, leaving the other terminal OS has a very small opportunity window, what are the expectations and requirements of the companys terminal operating system? Ren Zhengfei: if these three operating systems give HUAWEI an equal right, then our operating system is not needed. Why cant you use the advantage of others? When Microsofts president and CISCOs CEO chatted with me, they all said they were afraid that HUAWEI would stand up and raise the flag of the world. I told them I didnt fight against the monopoly. I had a Microsoft umbrella in my left hand and a CISCO umbrella in my right hand. You sold high prices. I just sold a little lower, and I could make a lot of money. Why do I have to take the umbrella off, let the sun shine on my head, sweat on my head, moisten the grass on the ground, and the grass is competing with me at a low price. We do terminal operating system now out of strategic consideration, if they suddenly break our food, Android system does not give me, WindowsPhone8 system does not give me, we are stupid? Similarly, when we were making high-end chips, I did not object to buying high-end chips in the US. I think you need to use their high-end chips as much as possible to understand it well. Only when they do not sell to us, our things are slightly worse, we must make use of them. We must not have a narrow sense of pride. This sense of pride will kill us. Our purpose is to earn money, we must take the upper ridge. You cant take the upper mountain, and take the Wall Street. Lets not be narrow minded. We have the same operating principle as the high-end chip. It is mainly for others to allow us to use, rather than breaking our food. When we break our grain, backup system can be used. The closed system is bound to die Ren Zhengfei: he translated, I didnt understand. He Tingbo: that is to say, if we use our chips, we do not need suppliers chips, and suppliers will impose pressure on us. Ren Zhengfei: as I have just said, we are an open system. We still need to use supplier chips, mainly to cooperate with suppliers, or even give priority to their chips. Our high-end chips are mainly for disaster recovery. It is a major strategic problem whether to use the low end chip or not. I suggest that we should discuss it carefully. What you have just said is that we do not have a suppliers system. We may have built a closed system. The closed system will inevitably run out of energy and die. We have just talked about the closed system of human resources, the exhaustion of energy and the death of technology systems. How can we balance the world scientifically and reasonably? This is a very difficult topic. I can not explain it to you in one sentence. Question: first of all is the problem of the positioning of the sea, we do have a narcissistic plot of technology, think that all is the key technology, is one of the core competitiveness of the company. But there are many voices saying that Hass is to reduce costs to the company. The brothers we underneath are really hard, the product line is very high on the cost, often working overtime for a little cost. Every point we earn is hard money. What is the position of the company to Hass? It is definitely an important system for Hass positioning, but your narcissism cant be taken. I just started to say that the system is closed. If it has narcissism, what we need to do, we have to use it, not to be honored if you dont need it. That is a closed system. We will run out of energy one day and we will die, so we have to do an open system. Your system may be abandoned, but it does not affect your personal achievements. This is the problem of human resources policy. Lets talk about this problem first, such as the high-speed railway in our country. China also manufactures high speed rail, and the Zhuzhou locomotive factory is the most advanced domestic factory at that time. At that time, when the high-speed rail was tender, Zhuzhou did not win the bid. All the western countries, such as Germany, France and Japan, had won the joint venture. Zhuzhou was the strongest locomotive factory in our country, while Germany, France and Japan were all joint ventures with poor locomotives, and the joint venture had eaten fat, and Zhuzhou had no loss. This is the art level handled by the Ministry of railways. How does the Ministry of Railways do it? Why is there no bitter in Zhuzhou? All the money you make from your joint venture will be given to Zhuzhou for technical research. I will use yours one day. Up to now, it has been confirmed that Zhuzhou can tender for 250 km of high-speed rail. Therefore, we may have to struggle in this area for decades. This post and project can not be removed, but the staff can flow. Shaolin Temple can also have CEO, monks can also travel, but the temple needs to be fixed there, which is the strategic banner of the company and can not be moved. For instance, do you know when to launch a nuclear war? Now, no, should we stop nuclear research? You say how many scientists have produced in our nuclear science. You see, there are lots of rows and rows of merit. Dont say Deng Jiaxian, there are many more alive, but when did you throw off the atomic bomb? So Hass must understand its strategic position from a strategic perspective. The source of this article: Niu Ye financial responsibility editor: Bai Xin _NT4464