The old woman was frightened by the dog and fell down. 110 thousand, the dog owner refused to pay as old Lai.

category:Society click:720
 The old woman was frightened by the dog and fell down. 110 thousand, the dog owner refused to pay as old Lai.


In October 17th, Changsha Tianxin District Court informed Chen that he was sentenced to 50% of responsibility for his lack of attention in walking. At present, dog owners have been listed as Lao Lai for refusing to fulfill the obligations set out in the effective judgment.

Frightened by a dog and broke into eight grade disability

Chen Mou, an old woman in July, had the habit of taking a walk every morning. At 6 am on June 30, 2016, Chen Mou took a walk near the Yalin Garden neighborhood where she lived as usual. At this time, a tall golden retriever suddenly hoo to Chen close, Chen was frightened, subconsciously flashed to the side, because did not stand firm and fell to the ground.

This Golden Retriever is a nearby resident Luo Mou, Luo Mous mother helped him walk the dog in the neighborhood that morning.

After falling down, Chen went to the hospital for treatment. Luo Mou paid a total of 11 thousand yuan for Chen. After appraisal by the center of judicial expertise: Chen Mou left distal radius fractures after internal fixation surgery, lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture, a comprehensive assessment of Grade 8 disability.

After Chens discharge, he failed to reach a compensation agreement with Luo on medical compensation fees. On April 1, 2017, Chen Mou took Luo Mou to Tianxin District Peoples Court on the grounds that his rights to life, health and body were infringed. He asked the court to order Luo Mou to compensate Chen Mou for 112,468.8 yuan.

Luo argued that the pet dog did not take the initiative to attack the plaintiff, Chen was to see her pet dog was frightened and caused a fall, but willing to assume legal responsibility within the scope of the law. And he has already paid medical fees, nursing fees a total of 11,000 yuan, should be deducted in the amount of compensation, at the same time, part of Chens appeal is too high, request to be reduced.

The court decided that both sides bear 50% responsibilities.

Tianxin District Court after hearing that the focus of controversy in this case is: plaintiff Chen fall is related to the defendant Luo Mous mother walking a dog, Luo Mou should bear civil liability?

The court held that the defendants pet dog had approached the plaintiff on its own initiative, causing the plaintiff to be frightened, stand unstable and fall. According to the actual situation, it can be concluded that the plaintiffs fall was caused by the fright of the defendants dog, so the defendant, as the dog breeder, should bear the corresponding civil liability according to law and compensate the plaintiff for the corresponding losses.

At the same time, the plaintiff was frightened to fall, although the defendants management of the dog and frightened components, but also has its attention is not focused, resulting in the discovery of the dog, the dog has been around the cause of fright. After comprehensive consideration, the plaintiff and the defendant should be equally liable for the consequences of the damage.

Finally, the Tianxin District Court decided in accordance with the law: defendant Luo compensated plaintiff Chen for 44351.9 yuan.

After the first instance verdict of the case that the dog owner was listed on the list of dishonesty, neither the plaintiff nor the defendant filed an appeal, the verdict became legally effective. Because the defendant has not fulfilled the courts decision, the plaintiff applied to the court for enforcement. Tianxin District Peoples Court Executive Judge disclosed that they repeatedly contacted the person executed by telephone Luo, Luo always refused to come to the court for different reasons to perform legal obligations. The executive judge inquired about Luos personal account and real estate, and found no property to be executed. According to the application of the applicant, Tianxin court has incorporated Luo into the list of the dishonest executors. Through Xiaoxiang Morning Post, the executive judge once again urged the executed Luo Mou to fulfill his legal obligations to the court as soon as possible, otherwise the court will take compulsory measures such as fines, detention. Source: Xiaoxiang Morning Post editor in charge: Ji Xue Ying _NN6784

Dog owner missing list is missing

After the first instance was pronounced, neither of the two defendants appealed. The judgment was legally binding. Because the defendant has not fulfilled the courts decision, the plaintiff applied to the court for enforcement.

Tianxin District Peoples Court Executive Judge disclosed that they repeatedly contacted the person executed by telephone Luo, Luo always refused to come to the court for different reasons to perform legal obligations. The executive judge inquired about Luos personal account and real estate, and found no property to be executed. According to the application of the applicant, Tianxin court has incorporated Luo into the list of the dishonest executors.

Through Xiaoxiang Morning Post, the executive judge once again urged the executed Luo Mou to fulfill his legal obligations to the court as soon as possible, otherwise the court will take compulsory measures such as fines, detention.