Wang Yonggang recalled that in addition to requesting a transfer, Meng also asked him to sign a number of entrustment contracts, the above-mentioned part of the money into lawyer fees, and said it was to meet the audit. Until his father was bailed out of custody, his lawyer still asked him to pay the fee.
Serious case group 37 comb found that before, to clear the relationship and handle bail pending trial, the family of the parties to ask for money is not a small number of cases, but as an attorney, suspected of swindling tens of millions of his clients is relatively rare. In addition, due to the lawyers inadequate agency work in the early, leading to the client involved in the trial phase of the case, evidence and other aspects of possible violations of law and other sequelae.
3 million bail pending trial 6 million amendment of audit report
In July 2015, an equity dispute occurred in Shandong involving the transfer of shares of two enterprises. The two parties in Qingzhou, Shandong Province, had a conflict and reported the case. Qingzhou police considered the incident to be an economic dispute, so they decided not to file a case in March 2015. After that, one of the parties to the dispute reported to Wuhan Public Security Bureau. In July 2015, Wang Qingjun, the head of the other partys business, and two other employees of the company were taken away by Wuhan police.
According to friends, Wang Yonggang, Wang Qingjuns son, appointed Meng Mou, director of a law firm in Shandong Province, as his fathers defense lawyer, signed a principal-agent contract and paid 1.5 million lawyer fees.
At first, lawyer Meng read the relevant materials from our side and went to Wuhan to meet my father. He said that my father had no major problems, that is, economic disputes and tended to plead innocently. But then my father was arrested, he communicated with Wuhan a few times, came back to tell me that this is a serious matter, to obtain the understanding of the other side before the possibility of bail, and then opened his mouth to say that another 3 million to clear up the relationship for bail pending trial. Wang Yonggang said.
In August 2015, Wang Yonggang put 3 million yuan into the accounts of a Meng law firm. Wang Yonggang said that after the transfer, Meng also took a photo of the amount of money in the account, claiming that it was sent to the clerk to confirm that the money had arrived, and the other party could start the insurance.
Until one day in mid-January 2016, Meng told Wang Yonggang that he had seen Wang Qingjuns audit report and issued a draft of the audit report to Wang Yonggang, which showed that Wang Qingjun was suspected of misappropriating funds and appropriating nearly 200 million yuan.
He said the problem was serious. If he could pay six million dollars, he could find a relationship to revise the audit report, and the results would be better for my father. Wang Yonggang said he would then enter 6 million of Mengs law firms account.
Wang Yonggang recalled that, in addition to the above two clearance relations for guarantees and amendments to the audit report on the grounds of money, in March to August 2016, Meng Mou, on the grounds of guarantees pending trial, guests and gifts, let his four transfers totaled 6.5 million yuan. Telephone recording can also be corroborated. At that time, Meng asked for money from Wang Yonggang on various pretexts such as bail pending trial.
Wang Yonggang added that, in addition to requesting transfers, Meng also asked him to sign a number of entrustment contracts, the above-mentioned part of the money into lawyer fees, and said it was to pay for the audit. Wang Yonggang said that in this process, the progress of legal proceedings behind the case is not very clear.
Acquisition of insurance at the expiration of detention
Lawyers still need 5 million office fees.
In fact, because Wuhan public security in the absence of jurisdiction in the case of cross-provincial arrest, Wang Qingjun was prosecuted to the court, Wuhan East Lake New Technology Development Zone Court on August 12, 2016, no jurisdiction to the Procuratorate issued a letter of withdrawal. On August 18, 2016, six days after the court dropped out of the case, Wang Qingjun three people were bailed pending trial, so far, Wang Qingjun was detained more than 400 days.
The letter of withdrawal from the court issued by the court of Wuhan East Lake new technology development zone to the procuratorate. Respondents for map
Serious case group No. 37 learned that Wang Qingjun was bailed pending trial, in fact, in accordance with the law, because the period of detention has expired, the public security organs must go through bail pending trial formalities for Wang Qingjun according to law.
But just the day after Wang Qingjun was taken out, Meng found Wang Yonggang again, saying that he had successfully handled the bail and asked Wang Yonggang to transfer 5 million yuan. Wang Yonggang said, at this time, he still does not have much doubt.
It was not until I saw my father that I realized that many words that Meng said were false. Wang Yonggang said that during his fathers detention, because he could not go to the detention center to meet his father, all the information was transmitted by Meng Mou.
In this process, Meng promised to Wang Yonggang that he had negotiated with the disputed company many times. As long as he agreed to the other sides conditions, the other side could issue a letter of understanding. At the same time, he asked Wang Qingjun to sign a number of reconciliation agreements in exchange for lighter guarantees and so on.
Wang Yonggang said his father told himself after he was bailed and awaited trial that the documents he signed in the detention center, Meng Mou, urged signature every time, so as not to read them carefully, and then said, If you sign, you can go out early.
The picture shows Wang Qingjun, who has been released on bail. Respondents for map
Wang Qingjun told the serious crime unit No. 37 that each time he met with Meng, the other side rarely talked about the case and checked the evidence. Most of them emphasized that they were negotiating with Wuhan police to reach a settlement and to find a relationship so that he could go out earlier. Wang Qingjun said that during the detention in the detention center, he met with Meng Mou many times, but did not see him to have done any meeting transcripts.
Wang Qingjun began to suspect Mengs previous behavior because the promise that he would soon be able to get out of the relationship by spending money was always unfulfilled. He said he had sent letters to his son Wang Yonggang from other lawyers in the detention center, saying that Meng might be an inner ghost and tricked him into confessing his guilt by fabricating lies. But his son Wang Yonggang believed in him because of his various official status.
Attorneys arrest for suspected fraud
According to public information, Meng served as director of a law firm in Shandong Province and legal adviser to Zibo Municipal Government before the case.
In February 2018, he was detained on suspicion of fraud and was arrested by the prosecutor in March. In April this year, Zibo prosecutors announced the progress of 27 criminal cases, including the arrest of suspect Meng Mou by fraud and said that the investigation of the case is in progress.
In August 16, 2018, the Linzi branch of Zibo Public Security Bureau transferred the case to Meng Mou for examination and prosecution. According to the investigation information of the public security department, Meng is suspected to have asked Wang Yonggang, the son of Wang Qingjun, for 15.5 million yuan on bail and pending trial in the case of embezzlement of funds on behalf of Wang Qingjun. The public security organ has transferred Mengs suspected fraud to examine and prosecute, and the case is returned to supplementary investigation.
Today, the case division 37 contacted a defender of Meng, the other side said that it is not convenient to respond to the case at this stage.
The victim Wang Yonggangs attorney, Cheng Xiaolu, said he accepted the victims Commission in August to represent the case, has applied for prosecution to conduct further investigation of other issues in a case in Meng, because the case has not yet been prosecuted, the specific circumstances of the case is not disclosed.
Serious case group No. 37 noted that at present, the official website of Zibo Law Association, vice president column has no name Meng.
Zibo lawyer can not find Mengs name online. Screenshots of official website.
rack down sb. to interview
According to the Regulations on the Administration of LawyersFees, the fees for lawyers services formulated by the government shall take into full consideration the local economic development level, social affordability and the long-term development of the lawyersprofession. The fee standards shall be determined by compensating the average social cost of lawyers services, plus reasonable profits and statutory taxes.
Serious division 37 learned that from the current situation of the lawyer industry, similar cases with Wang Qingjun, even if entrusted to senior first-line lawyers in Beishangguang and other cities, charges will not exceed a few million, and not as high as 15.5 million of the above-mentioned cases of lawyer fees.
It is understood that Wang Qingjuns case was returned by the court, Wuhan Public Security Bureau to adjust the charges involved in the case, again transferred the case to prosecution. Subsequently, the Hubei provincial procuratorate applied for the designation of jurisdiction to the Supreme Peoples Procuratorate. On April 5, 2017, the Supreme Procuratorate issued a reply to the Hubei Provincial Procuratorate, saying that the Hubei Provincial Procuratorate had no jurisdiction over the case. The case was referred to the competent procuratorial organ for examination and prosecution, and the case was subsequently prosecuted in the Qingzhou court. In October 9, 2018, the case held a pretrial session in the Qingzhou court. Wang Qingjun said he and his defense lawyers had asked Wuhan Public Security to rule out illegal jurisdiction and all statements, witness testimony and audit reports that he had been misled into giving as illegal evidence. At present, the Qingzhou court has not yet made a clear response to the application. The source of this article: No. 37 editor in chief of Li Zhong Yi group, Li Tian Yi, _NN7528
It is understood that Wang Qingjuns case was returned by the court, Wuhan Public Security Bureau to adjust the charges involved in the case, again transferred the case to prosecution. Subsequently, the Hubei provincial procuratorate applied for the designation of jurisdiction to the Supreme Peoples Procuratorate.
On April 5, 2017, the Supreme Procuratorate issued a reply to the Hubei Provincial Procuratorate, saying that the Hubei Provincial Procuratorate had no jurisdiction over the case. The case was referred to the competent procuratorial organ for examination and prosecution, and the case was subsequently prosecuted in the Qingzhou court.
In October 9, 2018, the case held a pretrial session in the Qingzhou court. Wang Qingjun said he and his defense lawyers had asked Wuhan Public Security to rule out illegal jurisdiction and all statements, witness testimony and audit reports that he had been misled into giving as illegal evidence. At present, the Qingzhou court has not yet made a clear response to the application.