Financial false customer transfer 760 thousand did not recover the 150 thousand yuan outstanding company.

category:Global
 Financial false customer transfer 760 thousand did not recover the 150 thousand yuan outstanding company.


Guangzhou daily news a companys financial personnel, according to the claim of the companys legal representative on WeChat, transfers 764 thousand yuan to the customer. Who knows, it is not corporate clients who collect money, nor is it required that they transfer the companys legal person. The money that had been cheated had not been recovered, and the company brought the finance to the court, demanding that it bear the loss. Baiyun District Court decision, the finance in the absence of the corresponding examination and approval procedures and not verified, according to the WeChat payment order to pay, with the fault, the company at the same time there is management negligence, discretion of the financial staff is responsible for 20% or 152800 yuan of liability. The second trial maintains the original judgment. Luo Mou and Wu are the financial personnel of a company in Xun. They are responsible for the payment codes and the net bank code. In November 30, 2015, a person called a companys legal representative to send a person to roomo to ask WeChat to add a friend. The WeChat head image used a WeChat head image. The defendant, Luo, did not doubt and added a friend to the other. Then, the legal representative to spend one through WeChat instructed roomo to pay 764000 yuan to a companys bank account in Shenzhen, and at this time, there were many warning signs on WeChat. But Luo did not notice warning signs, nor did he confirm with Hua himself, calling Wu to conduct online banking. After payment, the defendant did not complete the relevant procedures, nor did he report the payment to the company. After a company found abnormal accounts of funds for investigation, after checking with Luo and Wu, the public security organs were called to the police on 3 December of the same year. The money being defrauded has not been recovered yet, and the plaintiff in Guangzhou Xun has lost 764000 yuan for this purpose. The Baiyun District Court holds that the defendant, who is responsible for auditing and foreign payment as the plaintiffs company, pays the payment according to the payment instructions issued by the WeChat in accordance with the case without the corresponding examination and approval procedures and not verifiable, thus causing the loss of the plaintiff. The defendant has a fault and should bear the corresponding compensation. Responsibility is paid. Source: Dayang net Guangzhou daily editor: Zhao Yaping _NN9005