The U. S. military EA18G aircraft was disturbed in the South China Sea? American media hype is Chinas dry

category:Military
 The U. S. military EA18G aircraft was disturbed in the South China Sea? American media hype is Chinas dry


Data map: Roosevelt aircraft carrier [global military April 20th] the U. S. Navys EA-18G grower electronic warfare aircraft is known for its powerful electronic oppression, but the US business insider site said 18 days ago that the aircraft was recently disturbed over the South China Sea. The United States does not have any evidence to prove where the interference comes from, but it is taken for granted that this is what China has done. But even American experts are skeptical. The report says the US Navys Roosevelt nuclear powered aircraft carrier has arrived in Philippines, while the pilot report on the ship depicts a disturbing scene - an increasingly tense relationship with China. The fact is that some of your devices are not working properly, indicating that someone is trying to interfere with you. So we come to this conclusion. The pilot of an EA-18G electronic war aircraft said. Omar Lamrani, a military analyst at geopolitical consulting firm Stratfor, told the business insider when asked about the potential interference: this is not what Americans think can be kind or negligible... The United States may try to fight in some way. Lamrani said that if targeting the navigation or communication system, interference may be dangerous, but the US Navys electronic attack aircraft can cope with this challenge. Roar is a very powerful machine, Lamrani said. I doubt whether the Chinese can really have such a big impact on the aircraft. This system will try to interfere with and suppress them, but I do not think this will cause security problems. Lamrani believes that a manned aircraft can usually counter signal interference. Drivers in the cockpit can fly according to their own judgment and other airborne equipment in the case of loss of communication or navigation, but the interference may pose a serious threat to the US Navy UAVs because there are no personnel in the aircraft. According to Lamrani, although the interference is far less than fire fire (more provocative), the provocation may be escalated, and the impact on both sides may be negative. A Chinese military expert, who did not want to be named, said 19 to the Global Times reporter, from the United States media report, there was not enough evidence to prove that the Chinese interference was encountered, even if the EA-18G was really disturbed by human interference. EA-18G is equipped with advanced radar, navigation system and communication system. At the same time, its electronic warfare system can locate the radiation source of the other side and interfere with the other radar and communication system. The equipment that EA-18G may encounter are mainly radar, GPS system and communication system. But the high-sensitivity passive detection system that it carries has a certain location and direction finding capability for the high power interference source theoretically. If the US considers interference from China, it should provide more evidence, rather than simply say that the airborne equipment is not working. * (Zhang Yichi) this article source: Global Times - Global network. More brilliant, please log on to World Wide Web http://www.huanqiu.com editor: ye Zhi FA _NBJS6073 A Chinese military expert, who did not want to be named, said 19 to the Global Times reporter, from the United States media report, there was not enough evidence to prove that the Chinese interference was encountered, even if the EA-18G was really disturbed by human interference. EA-18G is equipped with advanced radar, navigation system and communication system. At the same time, its electronic warfare system can locate the radiation source of the other side and interfere with the other radar and communication system. The equipment that EA-18G may encounter are mainly radar, GPS system and communication system. But the high-sensitivity passive detection system that it carries has a certain location and direction finding capability for the high power interference source theoretically. If the US considers interference from China, it should provide more evidence, rather than simply say that the airborne equipment is not working. * (Zhang Yichi)