1 kilograms of methamphetamine found in the womens BMW car was found not guilty because of insufficient evidence.

category:Global
 1 kilograms of methamphetamine found in the womens BMW car was found not guilty because of insufficient evidence.


The drug trafficking mystery in Guangzhou has been ruled. The verdict published recently by Chinas judicial document network shows that in February 2, 2018, the intermediate peoples Court of Guangzhou decided that the defendant, Liu, was innocent. The verdict is based on the fact that the crime of doubt is not. Report: a kilogram of drugs in a BMW car The case comes from a report. According to the verdict, 14 oclock in December 21, 2015, Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau Panyu Branch City Bridge police station police station police received a woman report, said in Panyu District City Bridge Street near the Yushan Avenue near the back of the friendship creative park on the back of the road, Liu Mou (woman) driving a white BMW car parked on the roadside, the car has drugs. The whistleblower said she and Liu knew that they could not provide Lius situation and make identification materials, and then left. The police rushed to the back door of the friendship creative park to see the road. It was found that a white BMW car was stopped at the road. A woman on the drivers seat was sitting in the car and playing with a mobile phone. The investigators looked around every now and then. The investigators observed for a period of time. The woman had been sitting in the car without contact with anyone. The detective found suspicious and showed police card for search at 15 oclock. The police found a white crystal under the drivers seat of the car. After the case of the police, it was testified to the court that the bag was wrapped in red rubber bag, and there was a yellow green tea bag inside the bag. There was a white transparent bag in the tea bag and white crystal in the white transparent bag. It weighed about 2 jin. The police found that the woman on the BMW car was a post-80 generation. On the same day, Liu was detained and was detained the next day. Identified by the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security judicial authentication center: the net weight of the white crystal was 1000.06 grams, and the methamphetamine component was detected, the content was 78.8%. Court hearing: the whistle blowers crime year is called why cant I remember why? In July 4, 2017, the Guangzhou Municipal Peoples Procuratorate accused the defendant, Liu, of committing drug trafficking and prosecuted the court. Prosecutors charged that in December 2015, the defendant, Liu, bought methamphetamine (methamphetamine) from the unlawful elements. At 14 hours in December 21, 2015, he was allowed to carry drugs to the back door of the Yili Creative Park, Panyu mountain Avenue, Panyu District City, to be sold to others and was seized by the police. The public prosecutor believes that the defendant, Liu, is selling drug methamphetamine in a large quantity and should be investigated for criminal responsibility for drug trafficking. After receiving the Guangzhou intermediate peoples court, the two public hearings were held in August 1, 2017 and October 18th. In court, the defendant Liu denied the crime, arguing that no drug trafficking was seized, and that the drug seized was the reporter of Zhou. Liu said that the day of the case, she opened the car last week, according to Zhous instructions to drive the car to the case of parking, the next week to leave to take things, she sat in the car waiting for a week. At this time, she saw a white plastic bag in the seat of the side driving seat of Zhous seat. I opened the bag with a large bag of white crystals and looked like the sugar to eat. I didnt pay any attention to it. I continued to wait for a week until the police came to search. In court, the prosecutor presented the testimony of Zhou, a reporter who refused to make notes in public security organs. The record is already a year after the case. Zhou said she met the defendant in 2015. I dont know why I told her two years ago. Its too long to remember. I was still taking drugs when I reported her, Zhou said. She asked me to sell her ice poison before the case, but I dont know why she was looking for me. I used to sell drugs. In the verdict, Lius defender proposed a lot of doubts in the case: 1. of the cases were not all Liu, but Zhou was placed on its car; the 2. test report did not conform to the legal provisions and could not be used as a basis for the case; 3. could not exclude the possibility that Zhou Mou was planted to Langer Liu, and 4. could not rule out the investigation organs in the investigation process. Reasonable suspicion of false false; 5. Liu Mou has not trafficked in drug trafficking, the case is not clear, the evidence is insufficient, in accordance with the principle of doubt of the crime, he should be sentenced to innocence; 6. even if it is found that Liu Mou constitutes a crime, and the doubt is not completely eliminated, it should be sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment for the crime of illegal possession of drugs. Judgment: the informants testimony varies, and the accused is innocent. After the trial, the Guangzhou central court held that the public security organ took a certificate from a whistleblower in a year after the case, but his testimony was different from the defendant, Liu Mou, who trafficked drugs, how many drugs and whether it shared a vehicle to the case, and was unable to verify each other with the WeChat chat record. When testifying in court, the court also denied that there were drug buyers. Therefore, the public prosecutor accused the defendant of the fact that Liu was guilty of drug trafficking. The court found that although the drug involved in the defendant Lius car was found, the defendant confessed that the location of the drug was a deputy driving seat before a whistleblower Zhou got off. The defendant proposed that the drug was carried on the car by Zhou. Therefore, the defence and defense opinions of the accused and his defenders shall be adopted. The middle court of Guangzhou believes that the evidence in this case has not formed a complete proof system for the evidence of the crime of selling drugs by the defendant Liu, and has not reached the sufficient legal proof standard of the evidence. It has not reached the basic facts clearly and the basic evidence is conclusive, and the reasonable doubt can not be ruled out. In February 2, 2018, more than two years after the incident, the first instance of the Guangzhou intermediate peoples court decided that the defendant, Liu, was not guilty and the seized drugs were confiscated. This article source: surging news editor: Ji Xueying _NN6784 The court found that although the drug involved in the defendant Lius car was found, the defendant confessed that the location of the drug was a deputy driving seat before a whistleblower Zhou got off. The defendant proposed that the drug was carried on the car by Zhou. Therefore, the defence and defense opinions of the accused and his defenders shall be adopted. The middle court of Guangzhou believes that the evidence in this case has not formed a complete proof system for the evidence of the crime of selling drugs by the defendant Liu, and has not reached the sufficient legal proof standard of the evidence. It has not reached the basic facts clearly and the basic evidence is conclusive, and the reasonable doubt can not be ruled out. In February 2, 2018, more than two years after the incident, the first instance of the Guangzhou intermediate peoples court decided that the defendant, Liu, was not guilty and the seized drugs were confiscated.