The man covered his sick face with a quilt and killed himself.

category:Society click:444
 The man covered his sick face with a quilt and killed himself.


BEIJING, Sept. 15 (Xinhua) - The Peoples Procuratorate of Jiangsu Province announced on the 15th that Yangzhou prosecutors had sentenced the first instance of the case of Baoyings eldest sons sick father to life imprisonment for intentional homicide.

In November 26, 2017, a sick old man committed suicide at home in Baoying, Jiangsu. After the police intervention, the eldest son of the old man Zhumou confessed that he saw his father wanted to commit suicide, to send his father a journey, the father was killed. During the trial, he denied it and argued that his father committed suicide.

On September 11, the Yangzhou Intermediate Peoples Court issued a public verdict in the first instance of the highly concerned case of Baoyings eldest son murdered his father. Zhu was sentenced to life imprisonment for intentional homicide and deprived of political rights for life.

Zhu, a resident of Sheyang town in Baoying County, is the oldest in the family. The identity card information showed that he was born in 1948, but he was born in the court hearing in 1952. Zhus father died when he was 83 years old. He lived alone until his son got married.

On October 1, 2017, Father Zhu suffered from cerebral hemorrhage, resulting in hemiplegia, only the right arm and right leg can move, life can not take care of themselves. After discharging home, Zhus family agreed that Zhus three brothers take turns to take care of Zhus father, but because the old three work in the field, temporarily by the eldest son Zhu and the second son Zhu take turns to take care of the cycle for each 10 days. During this period, Zhu and his father tried to commit suicide by fasting and other ways, and gave up after persuasion.

In November 21, 2017, the second time Zhu took care of his father. On the morning of 26, Zhu bought 9 sleeping pills to his father at the local hospital. At 10:00 that evening, Zhu went to his fathers residence, claiming to find his father lying in bed, neck wrapped around a red cloth strip, trying to strangle his neck to suicide, so he covered his fathers face with a quilt, and put his hand over his fathers mouth and nose until his death. Zhu told his relatives and neighbors that his father died of suicide by strangulation. On the 29 day, the local people informed the public security organ of Zhus suicide.

In a public security inquiry, Zhu confessed to his fathers death by covering his face with a quilt and covering his mouth and nose. After forensic examination, Zhus father was covered by his nose and strangled by mechanical asphyxia.

Zhu confessed that while he was serving his father, his father asked him to help him buy sleeping pills for suicide, but he did not agree. On the morning of November 26, 2017, he bought sleeping pills at his fathers request. That night, when he saw his father attempting suicide, the evil idea of giving him a ride sprang up, which led to his fathers murder.

On June 20, 2018, the Yangzhou Intermediate Peoples Court opened a public hearing in Baoying County Court. Zhu retracted his confession in court, arguing that Zhu was suicidal.

On September 11, the Yangzhou Intermediate Peoples Court issued a public verdict of first instance on the case: Zhu was sentenced to life imprisonment for intentional homicide and deprived of political rights for life. In view of why did not adopt Zhu Mou and his defenders defense opinion, why sentenced Zhu so, the court gave an explanation in this judgment.

The court held that the evidence of relevant witnesses was sufficient to judge that although Zhu had previously been on hunger strike, his desire to commit suicide was not strong. Due to the hemiplegia of Zhus father, Zhu could not independently complete the way he defended Zhus suicide. Forensic identification confirmed that Zhus death was the result of others injuring. In addition, Zhu had confessed that he had murdered his father by covering his face with a quilt and covering his mouth and nose. The confession was confirmed by Zhus expert opinions on fracture of the upper right corner of his thyroid cartilage, strong suffocation signs and stability, which did not constitute the cause of Zhus death. Therefore, the court held that Zhus defense of claiming Zhus paternal suicide was not credible and Zhu could be convicted of killing his father. Accordingly, the court held that although Zhu confessed his criminal acts truthfully in the process of investigation by the public security organs, the court denied the criminal act of murdering his father by covering his mouth and nose, which was not an excuse of the general nature of the act. According to the law, Zhus return to justice did not constitute surrender. Zhus behavior constitutes the crime of intentional homicide. Although he has obtained the understanding of the close relatives of the victim, his killing of his father is cruel, which seriously violates the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, is even more incompatible with the law, and is extremely harmful to society. According to the principle of compatibility between crime, responsibility and punishment, the court sentenced Zhu to life imprisonment according to law and deprived him of politics. Rights for life. Source: China News Net editor: Zhang Xianchao _NN9310

The court held that the evidence of relevant witnesses was sufficient to judge that although Zhu had previously been on hunger strike, his desire to commit suicide was not strong. Due to the hemiplegia of Zhus father, Zhu could not independently complete the way he defended Zhus suicide. Forensic identification confirmed that Zhus death was the result of others injuring. In addition, Zhu had confessed that he had murdered his father by covering his face with a quilt and covering his mouth and nose. The confession was confirmed by Zhus expert opinions on fracture of the upper right corner of his thyroid cartilage, strong suffocation signs and stability, which did not constitute the cause of Zhus death. Therefore, the court held that Zhus defense of claiming Zhus paternal suicide was not credible and Zhu could be convicted of killing his father.

Accordingly, the court held that although Zhu confessed his criminal acts truthfully in the process of investigation by the public security organs, the court denied the criminal act of murdering his father by covering his mouth and nose, which was not an excuse of the general nature of the act. According to the law, Zhus return to justice did not constitute surrender.

Zhus behavior constitutes the crime of intentional homicide. Although he has obtained the understanding of the close relatives of the victim, his killing of his father is cruel, which seriously violates the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, is even more incompatible with the law, and is extremely harmful to society. According to the principle of compatibility between crime, responsibility and punishment, the court sentenced Zhu to life imprisonment according to law and deprived him of politics. Rights for life.