On Sept. 14, Peng Mei News combined the keywords of Casta Group and AIP Group (all fictitious by Dong Peng) on China HowNet and Wanfang data, and found that there were at least hundreds of articles related to Dong Peng, including some articles exposed by the media in 2016, with more than 100 articles.
For example, in Wanfang data search Dong Peng, appeared in the first article for the business card, cultural focus - visit Carlyle (Meizhou) Rubber Products Co., Ltd. director Dong Peng, further check the details show that the article was published in 2014Modern Enterprise Culturemagazine No. 22, this is a pair of Dong Peng. An interview with him at that time was made by Carlyle company. And the Chengdu Business Daily in 2016 has been clearly pointed out that Dong Peng did work in Carlyle, leaving in 2015, but not company executives, strategic advisers or chief research fellows, just a documentary member.
In July this year, Yang Zhu, deputy editor of the editorial department of Journal of Quanzhou Teachers College, wrote an article on the phenomenon of unsolicited academic misconduct and its treatment. Based on the case study of Dong Pengs academic misconduct (hereinafter referred to as Yang Zhus thesis), the paper analyzes in detail the impact of Dong Pengs academic misconduct and governance strategies. According to Yang Zhus paper statistics, as of January 2, 2016, 279 papers (33.98%) of Dong Pengs academic misconduct were cancelled by relevant journals, and 542 papers (66.02%) were still in the database. Judging from the withdrawal statement, only one paper in the Journal of Shanghai Education Assessment Research was published when it was withdrawn.
Yang Zhus paper cited 220 citations and 322 unquoted articles in Dong Pengs academic misconduct papers, which are still kept in China KnowledgeNets Journal database, as of January 2, 2008. The most frequently cited journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) published in the eighth issue of the Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) in 2014 was Research on the Dilemma and Optimized Management of Logistics in Manufacturing Industry for 46 times. Among them, 43 were cited by other papers of Dong Peng, the other three were cited by others, and the cited time was all news reports about Dong Pengs academic misconduct. After the piece.
Yang Zhus paper argues that many of Dong Pengs papers can be retrieved from databases such as China HowNet, Wipe and Wanfang because they have not been completely revoked. These unwritten papers have not been labeled as academic misconduct in major databases. Therefore, these papers are constantly being downloaded or even cited. Even though Dong Pengs academic misconduct has been widely reported and caused considerable shock in the academic circles, it is still difficult for many readers to distinguish whether the literature they have retrieved is academic misconduct.
In view of the fact that Dong Pengs related papers were not withdrawn, Peng Mei News consulted China HowNet and Wanfang Data respectively in the afternoon of 14 th.
A staff member of the editorial department of China HowNet responded by saying, We withdraw manuscripts on this side according to the withdrawal letter of the editorial department of the periodical. Generally, individuals apply for withdrawal from the periodical, and then the editorial department sends the withdrawal letter to us. We will withdraw the manuscript only after we receive it. We will not initiate withdrawal without the consent of the magazine. .
The staff also disclosed that even if the paper was proved to be fraudulent, but as long as China KnowledgeNet did not receive a letter of withdrawal from the relevant journal editorial office, still can not withdraw manuscripts at will.
For Dong Pengs large number of papers have not been withdrawn, the staff said that they will report and communicate with relevant journals and magazines, because the quality of the papers and the repetition rate of issues are controlled by journals and magazines themselves, China KnowledgeNet does not have the responsibility of secondary audit.
Similarly, a staff member of Wanfang Data also said that the withdrawal of the manuscript must have the withdrawal letter of the editorial department, Wanfang data and cooperative journals and magazines are related agreements in advance, can not be withdrawn without the authorization of the editorial department.
In addition, on September 14, a staff member of the editorial department of the Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) responded in an interview with Peng Mei News: We do not know about this at present, and we have not received any reports from individuals or organizations before. Previous reports of plagiarism in the media are not very clear, and we generally believe that only papers from schools or institutions officially verified plagiarism instructions. However, the staff also said that the next thing to verify this matter, if it is true, will issue a withdrawal request to China HowNet.
In January 2016, Professor Xu Jianhua of Shanghai Maritime University discovered that his thesis had been plagiarized by Dong Peng and that Dong Peng had committed many academic misconduct. Subsequently, the Legal Evening News and Chengdu Business News and other media have reported on Dong Pengs academic misconduct.
In January, Professor Xu Jianhua of Shanghai Maritime University found himself plagiarized by a man named Dong Peng in the paper Who and What the Great Boat Goods and Passes published in the 7th issue of China Ship Inspection magazine in 2015, according to the article Professor of Shanghai Maritime University said the paper was plagiarized published in the Legal Evening News on August 21, 2016. Dong Peng changed the title to Is Large Container Ships Right and Wrong. It was published in the first issue of the same magazine in 2016 and signed by Dong Peng as the sole author or the first author respectively. It was also published in four other magazines. The person in charge of China Ship Inspection magazine said that Dong Peng had been known to plagiarize other peoples articles and had been blacklisted in the magazine. All the works previously published by Dong Peng had been deleted.
In September 8, 2016, the Chengdu business daily published the article the great God of paper. Since 2011, Dong Peng, a man, has published about 800 articles, mostly papers, in newspapers and academic journals in some industries over the past five years. These articles cover many fields, such as modern logistics, industrial economics, aesthetic theory, ancient literature, psychology, film and drama, and so on. But according to the Chengdu Business Daily reporters investigation, the paper god has another pair of faces - he falsified various tall identities, fabricated, tampered with state-level scientific research projects, and then fooled some prominent paper co-authors, so in hundreds of journals and journals published signed articles, but also more than one contribution. Recently, a reporter from Chengdu Business Daily persuaded Dong Peng to accept the interview. He admitted his plagiarism and apologized. He admitted that he had never been to a university, and that he had no doctorate degree.
In addition, the article also mentions that many co-signers appearing in Dong Pengs paper have been confirmed as fiction after verification by reporters, and only some of them actually exist. Among them, in an article entitled Exploration of Manufacturing Production Scheduling System in the Context of Globalization, Dong Pengluo listed five collaborators, including Yu Changli, School of Ship Engineering, Harbin University of Technology, Dong Yinhong, and others. Yu Changli told Chengdu Business Daily that he was studying abroad at the time of the incident. At that time, I published an article in Modern Manufacturing Engineering. Dong Peng wrote to me and attached an article. I hope I can make some comments. I didnt expect him to publish my name without asking for my advice.
At first I just wanted to share my work experience with you, Dong Peng told Chengdu Business Daily. At that time, I wrote some management articles. I do not want to talk about plagiarism or source problems in some articles. But I would like to sincerely apologize to everyone I have plagiarized. In addition, he also told the Chengdu Business Daily reporter, the initial publication of the paper, just want to improve their popularity. But I didnt expect it to go off very soon. At the same time, he also said, Since ancient times, fame and wealth are not divided, I thought that with popularity can find a better job. At the very beginning, I also had some social networking charges for some magazines. In the past one or two years, fame has been so great that there is no need to pay for the layout. Most academic journals are actually not paid, and I didnt take these papers to commend titles. Now I am an unemployed person and I am unemployed at home. What are the advantages? In short, I dare not do so later. I apologize again to the public and sincerely accept social supervision. The source of this article: surging news editor: Zhao Yaping _NN9005
At first I just wanted to share my work experience with you, Dong Peng told Chengdu Business Daily. At that time, I wrote some management articles. I do not want to talk about plagiarism or source problems in some articles. But I would like to sincerely apologize to everyone I have plagiarized.
In addition, he also told the Chengdu Business Daily reporter, the initial publication of the paper, just want to improve their popularity. But I didnt expect it to go off very soon. At the same time, he also said, Since ancient times, fame and wealth are not divided, I thought that with popularity can find a better job. At the very beginning, I also had some social networking charges for some magazines. In the past one or two years, fame has been so great that there is no need to pay for the layout. Most academic journals are actually not paid, and I didnt take these papers to commend titles. Now I am an unemployed person and I am unemployed at home. What are the advantages? In short, I dare not do so later. I apologize again to the public and sincerely accept social supervision.