The reconciliation court of the two sides reported the reconciliation after helping the elderly to be wrong.

category:Society click:418
 The reconciliation court of the two sides reported the reconciliation after helping the elderly to be wrong.


Recently, the young people to help the elderly volunteer against false, the truth became clear after the prosecution of the elderly has aroused widespread concern in the community. The helper sued the wrestler for apology and compensation of $1. Finally, the two sides reached a settlement in the pre-court mediation. The helper accepted the verbal apology of the wrestler, voluntarily abandoned other litigation requests, and donated the $5,000 required for the apology to the Red Cross Society of Jinhua.

According to the notice of the Peoples Court of Wucheng District of Jinhua City, at 4:00 p.m. on September 13, the Wucheng Court received the indictment materials of the case of Teng Weihang v. Cao Lians tort liability dispute. The plaintiff said that on September 2, 2018, he kindly helped the defendant who fell to the ground, but the defendant claimed that the plaintiff hit him and demanded compensation. The defendant was ordered to publish a statement of apology on the non-advertising page of Jinhua Daily. The area of the page should be no less than 6cm *9cm (business card size). 2. The defendant was ordered to compensate the plaintiff for his mental damage.

On the morning of September 14th, the court of Wucheng filed the case after examining the necessary material of the case. After filing the case, the judge immediately contacted the defendant and went to the defendants Jinhua City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. He served the defendant with copies of the indictment and other legal documents, and notified the plaintiff and the defendant to conduct pre-trial mediation.

At 5:00 p.m. on September 14, according to the wishes of both parties to the plaintiff and the defendant, the accepting judge organized the plaintiff and his agent entrusted by the litigation, and the defendants agent entrusted by the litigation (the defendants son Cao Mou) to mediate in court.

The two sides confirm the facts as follows: on the afternoon of September 2, 2018, the plaintiff driving an electric vehicle along the Jiefang West Route in downtown Jinhua, found a car in front of the non-motorized Lane turning, the plaintiff slowed down, heard the sound of a car fall behind, and later found the defendant with a car fell to the ground. Then the plaintiff parked his electric car and went forward to inquire about the defendants injuries. The defendant stood up and tried to help the electric car. The plaintiff came forward to help the car. Just as the plaintiff helped the defendant push the car to the roadside, a passer-by appeared, accusing the plaintiff of bumping into people, and then the defendant called the police. When the traffic police arrived, they asked whether the defendant had a collision, and the defendant stated that the front wheel was scratched. Traffic police on the plaintiffs electric vehicles for on-site investigation, mainly to investigate whether there are collision marks, and took photos. Subsequently, the defendants family members arrived at the scene and sent the defendant to the hospital for treatment. On September 4, the traffic police called on both sides to deal with the accident, and the two sides disputed whether the plaintiff should be responsible for the accident. On September 6, the traffic police department took the video of the roadside store at the scene of the accident, restored the process of the accident, and issued an accident cognizance document, which determined that the defendant should be fully responsible for the accident. During the mediation process, the defendant expressed his willingness to apologize in the form of newspaper or online video, and was willing to compensate the plaintiff for the loss. The plaintiff understands the defendant, and both sides agree that the defendant should apologize orally and donate 5,000 yuan to the Red Cross Society of Jinhua for publishing the apology. The plaintiff voluntarily waives other claims. The Court considers that the proper handling of civil disputes between the two sides in the spirit of mutual understanding, mutual accommodation, good faith and friendliness conforms to the public order and good customs of the society and is conducive to social harmony and stability, and should be affirmed. The agreement reached between the two parties does not violate the provisions of the law. In the witness of the judge, the defendant entrusted the litigation agent to apologize to the plaintiff, the two sides shake hands and make peace. Source: Beiqing Net - Beijing Youth Daily editor in charge: Yang Yi _NBJ10647

The two sides confirm the facts as follows: on the afternoon of September 2, 2018, the plaintiff driving an electric vehicle along the Jiefang West Route in downtown Jinhua, found a car in front of the non-motorized Lane turning, the plaintiff slowed down, heard the sound of a car fall behind, and later found the defendant with a car fell to the ground. Then the plaintiff parked his electric car and went forward to inquire about the defendants injuries. The defendant stood up and tried to help the electric car. The plaintiff came forward to help the car. Just as the plaintiff helped the defendant push the car to the roadside, a passer-by appeared, accusing the plaintiff of bumping into people, and then the defendant called the police. When the traffic police arrived, they asked whether the defendant had a collision, and the defendant stated that the front wheel was scratched. Traffic police on the plaintiffs electric vehicles for on-site investigation, mainly to investigate whether there are collision marks, and took photos. Subsequently, the defendants family members arrived at the scene and sent the defendant to the hospital for treatment. On September 4, the traffic police called on both sides to deal with the accident, and the two sides disputed whether the plaintiff should be responsible for the accident. On September 6, the traffic police department took the video of the roadside store at the scene of the accident, restored the process of the accident, and issued an accident cognizance document, which determined that the defendant should be fully responsible for the accident.

During the mediation process, the defendant expressed his willingness to apologize in the form of newspaper or online video, and was willing to compensate the plaintiff for the loss. The plaintiff understands the defendant, and both sides agree that the defendant should apologize orally and donate 5,000 yuan to the Red Cross Society of Jinhua for publishing the apology. The plaintiff voluntarily waives other claims. The Court considers that the proper handling of civil disputes between the two sides in the spirit of mutual understanding, mutual accommodation, good faith and friendliness conforms to the public order and good customs of the society and is conducive to social harmony and stability, and should be affirmed. The agreement reached between the two parties does not violate the provisions of the law. In the witness of the judge, the defendant entrusted the litigation agent to apologize to the plaintiff, the two sides shake hands and make peace.