The Qingdao man was wrongly sentenced to Lao Lai by the court.

category:Society click:417
 The Qingdao man was wrongly sentenced to Lao Lai by the court.


A man in Qingdao, Shandong Province, became the defendant of a dispute over a contract for sale by installments in Pizhou, Jiangsu Province. Mr. Shen, who works in Qingdao, has no idea so far. He has not only become the defendant, but has been a defendant for three years. Mr. Shen told the Voice of China reporter that there is a referee website called Zhou Guoguang. He reported three times in 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively. For the first time and the second time, I didnt know what the reason was. When the third time came, the Yunlong District Court accepted the case.

(2017) Judgment No. 5450 of the Peoples Court of Xuzhou Yunlong District, Jiangsu Province, showed that the case was filed on October 11, 2017. Because the defendants whereabouts were unknown, the court formed a collegial panel according to law, and served the legal documents and summons to the defendant on November 19, 2017. On February 22, 2018, the court held a public hearing: the plaintiff engaged in wholesale and retail business of footwear, the defendant purchased goods from the plaintiff. As of January 17, 2009, the defendant owed the plaintiff 4500 yuan in total, and the defendant was in arrears on the same day (to the plaintiff). Court decision: The defendant Shen Mou should pay the plaintiff Mr. Zhou 4500 yuan and bank interest within 10 days from the date of this judgment.

So, Mr. Shen went to the Yunlong District Court in Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, to check the files, and found that the plaintiff provided an arrear slip that said, Pizhou Shen owes 4,500 yuan to Jinshan visitors, the date of payment is March 17, 2009, and there are two telephone numbers, in addition, there is no information. Mr Shen said he did not know the plaintiff at all, had never done footwear business, and did not own the two phone calls on the note.

Mr. Shen said: I contacted the plaintiffs lawyer Zhang Yulong, Zhang Yulong said you added my micro letter, and then asked me to send him my ID card, Zhang Yulong later issued my ID card to the plaintiff, that is, Zhou Guoguang. When Zhou Guoguang saw it, he did tell the wrong person.

Mr. Zhou told the media earlier that the lawyer had taken a number of Pizhou Shen Mou identity information for him to identify, he felt that one of the information is very similar to the party, it should be him, and then he handed over the matter to the lawyer. The plaintiff, Mr. Zhou, told VOA: At that time, I told my agent that I couldnt recognize him for such a long time, and I didnt know who he was. I didnt know this until Mr. Shen called me. This is all misunderstanding.

Zhang Yulong, the attorney of Jiangsu Di Yi law firm, did not respond to this.

A notice signed by the presiding judge showed that the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in December 2015 and in 2016, respectively, and then withdrew the lawsuit. On December 7, 2015, when the plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the court, the court mailed the responding legal document to the defendant by express mail, and the mail was returned to the defendant without the person being found in its original address. In September 2016, after the plaintiff filed another lawsuit, the court staff directly to the defendants domicile address to serve legal documents, no one at home, the local residentsCommittee said, Shen Mou went out to Qingdao to work, the plaintiff and local residents do not know Shen Mou foreign residence. In October 2017, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit again. The court dialed the two mobile phone numbers provided by the plaintiff, but no one answered them or Shen himself. Therefore, the plaintiff notified the defendant in the Peoples Court and served the legal documents responding to the lawsuit.

After the case aroused concern, the Yunlong District Peoples Court of Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, on September 13, served a ruling to Mr. Shen: the judgment was indeed wrong and should be retried. During the retrial period, the execution of the original judgment was suspended. However, because of this, Shens loan is still rejected, and on top of Alipay, there is information on the implementation of the Jiangsu high court. Mr. Shen said: a plaintiff, a lawyer, a courtroom civil trial hall, and an executive board. No one can verify where I am?For Mr. Shens request to cancel the online judgment of legal adjudication documents, the reporter sent a letter to contact the Yunlong District Peoples Court, but as of the time of submission, no response was received. According to media reports, the court said that it had applied to a higher court in accordance with the procedures, and that it was required by the Supreme Court to verify the decision before making a revocation. Source: China voice responsibility editor: Ji Guo Jie _NBJ11143

After the case aroused concern, the Yunlong District Peoples Court of Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, on September 13, served a ruling to Mr. Shen: the judgment was indeed wrong and should be retried. During the retrial period, the execution of the original judgment was suspended. However, because of this, Shens loan is still rejected, and on top of Alipay, there is information on the implementation of the Jiangsu high court. Mr. Shen said: a plaintiff, a lawyer, a courtroom civil trial hall, and an executive board. Is there no one to verify where I am?

As for Mr. Shens request to cancel the online judgment of legal judgment documents, the reporter sent a letter to the Peoples Court of Yunlong District, but as of the time of publication, no response was received. According to media reports, the court said that it had applied to a higher court in accordance with the procedures, and that it was required by the Supreme Court to verify the decision before making a revocation.