Wang Li (not his real name) told the China times that in September 2018, he entrusted his house in Chaoyang District of Beijing to a well-known large-scale long-term apartment institution. The term of the contract was three years, with a monthly rent of 6100 yuan. However, in early November, before the lease term arrived, the agency asked to terminate the contract with Wang Li or to reduce the rent through agreement. There are two solutions proposed by the agency. One is that both parties terminate the contract, and the institution pays two months rent as liquidated damages to the landlord. The landlord needs to return 18000 yuan of decoration fee and service quality deposit; the other is to reduce the rent by agreement, and the rent is changed to 5100 yuan per month.
The staff of the organization communicate with us in a rude manner, and there is no clear reason for the termination of the contract. It gives us a lot of pressure to say that the termination conditions are like this, which blocks our heart every day when we think about this matter. Wang Li said that she could not accept it. She thought that the contract had not expired, and the Agency proposed to break the contract, but asked the owner to return the decoration money, which was obviously unreasonable.
According to Wang Li, at that time, the agency only bought microwave oven, TV, water heater, simple furniture and other facilities for the house, and it was agreed that the decoration and home appliances in the house would be given to the landlord after the contract expired. In addition, Wang Li pointed out that the lease term signed with the institution was three years. The vacancy period of the first year was agreed to be three months, and the second and third years were one month. However, according to Wang Lis observation, the interior decoration of the house was completed about 10 days after the house was handed over to the organization, and then the house was rented out. There was no time for vacancy, ventilation and drying.
Although the agency still pays the rent to Wang Li on time every month, Wang Li is worried about whether this organization will run away like other long-term apartments, afraid that the rent can not be returned, and there will be conflicts with the tenants.
And Wang Li encountered similar landlords there are many, a national rights QQ group has reached more than 1400 people. Wang Li said that the organization has been breaking down each other recently. It will interview the landlords separately. If the landlords are good at talking, they will probably sign a termination agreement according to their conditions, and most of the losses will be borne by the landlords.
It is understood that most of the long-term rental apartment institutions have signed a large number of houses from 2017 to 2018, but since this year, the rent in Beijing has declined, and the profit space of the institutions has become smaller and smaller, which makes it difficult for the long-term rental apartment institutions which mainly rely on the two landlord mode to survive. Li Li introduced that in 2018, when the institution signed a contract with itself, the rent was 6100 yuan, and the price for renting out the platform after decoration was 7000 yuan, but the market price in 2020 could not reach this level. China Times reporter looked at the relevant real estate platform and found that the monthly rent of the same house type in the community has been reduced to about 6500 yuan, and the monthly rent of some houses has been marked to 5500 yuan.
At the same time of large-scale termination of the contract with the landlord, there are many cases of forced termination of the contract by the platform. Some tenants reflect that they live well in the house, but they have been informed by the platform to terminate the contract recently, but no compensation for breach of contract has been made. Some tenants also said that only through frequent communication and reporting problems to the regulatory authorities for many times, the institution would pay liquidated damages.
As for how to deal with the early termination of the contract, as well as the development plan of the enterprise, the reporter of China Times has sent the questions to the above-mentioned enterprises, but as of the time of publication, no reply has been received.
Negative news of long-term apartment industry
Since the beginning of the year, the black swan incident has accelerated the explosion of a large wave of long-term apartment rental enterprises, including Qingke, eggshell and other big brand enterprises, with negative news spreading.
According to Chen Xiao, an analyst at Zhuge housing data research center, the epidemic has become a catalyst for the explosion of long-term rental apartments, which are characterized by high investment cost, low rent return rate and long return period. The sudden outbreak of the epidemic led to a significant decline in the rental rate of long-term apartments and an increase in the vacancy rate, which eventually led to the tight cash flow of long-term apartments.
Why are there so many problems with long-term apartments? Hu Jinghui, chief economist of Jinghui think tank, told Huaxia times that, like P2P and bike sharing, supervision has been relaxed in recent years in order to innovate, resulting in serious deviation of some emerging industries under the control of capital, which has made society and consumers pay a heavy price.
Is there a broad prospect for this industry? According to Bai Wenxis analysis, housing rental is a rigid demand in the market, and long-term rental apartments will still have a broad living space in the future. Now the state has introduced a lot of regulatory measures, including capital supervision and other directions, which determines that enterprises with weak capital strength or model problems will be eliminated by the market, leaving good enterprises, and the industry will be more healthy after the waves.
Source of this article: Chen Hequn, editor in charge of CFA_ NB12679