CEO of Alibaba: will actively learn and respond to national policies and regulations

category:Finance
 CEO of Alibaba: will actively learn and respond to national policies and regulations


Supervision ant: the biggest scale listing in 16 years of game history

One ant is so small that it can be ignored. Thousands of ants can produce amazing power.

Ant group previously wrote in its prospectus that it named the company ant because it always believed that small is beautiful and small is powerful.

16 years ago, Alipay, which started in Taobao electric business, once proposed a dream: the future world, financial services will not be exclusive to a few people, but a service that every consumer can get whenever and wherever possible.

In October 2014, Alipays parent company was named after ants.

From the first guarantee transaction, to express payment, 310 loan, yuebao, money collection code Every important development of this financial ant walks in the boundary of innovation, arouses the nerve of traditional financial supervision, and even affects the process of Chinas financial innovation, supervision and development.

Up to now, ants financial technology business serves 1 billion domestic consumers and 80 million small and micro businesses, and has been highly recognized by the capital market.

But the dramatic reversal took place on the eve of listing bell ringing, and constantly breaking through peoples expectations. The senior executives of ant group were interviewed by four ministries and commissions, and the micro loan business, which accounts for nearly half of the profits, is facing new restrictions. The Shanghai Stock Exchange has announced that it will suspend its listing

Here, Chinas financial regulatory authorities rarely make frequent calls for financial innovation.

Prior to this, the special meeting of the financial stability and Development Committee of the State Council stressed that it is necessary to strengthen supervision and comprehensively incorporate financial activities into supervision according to law.

On November 2, Yi Gang, governor of the central bank, also said at the Hong Kong financial technology week that large technology companies have changed the rules of the game, but the protection of trade secrets and consumer privacy is a great challenge.

On November 6, at the regular policy briefing of the State Council, Liu Fushou, chief lawyer of the CIRC, directly said that he would bring all financial activities into the unified regulatory scope according to the financial attributes of financial technology.

The wind started at the end of Qingping, and the relevant regulatory statements and actions did not suddenly emerge overnight. Before that, the financial regulatory warning faced by ants has appeared.

In September this year, the peoples Bank of China issued the Trial Measures for the supervision and management of financial holding companies (hereinafter referred to as the financial control measures), which pointed out that the financial holding companies that meet the following conditions should be included in the supervision: first, the controlling shareholders and actual controllers are domestic non-financial enterprises, natural persons and recognized legal persons; second, the substantial control of two or more types of financial institutions; and third, the financial holding companies are subject to supervision The total assets or entrusted assets of financial institutions under substantial control reach a certain scale, or financial holding companies need to be established according to the requirements of macro prudential supervision. Ant group holds high gold content licenses such as payment, banking, insurance, fund, small loan, etc., and is bound to face strong financial control supervision.

In response to strong supervision, ant group formally appointed Li Chen, vice president of ant group, as the groups compliance director during the double 11 period, reporting directly to CEO Hu Xiaoming. Industry insiders pointed out that the establishment of such a post, ant group is to show the worlds determination to do a good job in compliance.

Some people in the industry pointed out that in order to meet the regulatory requirements and meet the listing conditions, the possibility of splitting ant groups restructuring business into listed companies also exists. It is not ruled out that the financial services such as payment, small loan and fund sales can be separated.

On November 17, at the third innovation economy forum, Fang Xinghai, vice chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, said when talking about when ant groups IPO would be restarted, whether there is a timetable for the listing of ant group depends on how the government reorganizes the regulatory framework of financial technology enterprises, and how the companies respond to the regulatory environment.

The largest scale of emergency brake

At about 9:00 on November 2, the official wechat of China Securities Regulatory Commission announced: today, the peoples Bank of China, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the State Administration of foreign exchange have held regulatory interviews with Ma Yun, the chairman of the board of directors, and Hu Xiaoming, the president of ant group.

At an interval of 25 minutes, the official wechat of the CIRC released a message: the CIRC and the peoples Bank of China solicit public opinions on the Interim Measures for the management of online small loan business (Draft) (hereinafter referred to as the Interim Measures for small online loans ) The online loan business with tight document supervision is one of the main businesses of ant group.

Later, Guo Wuping, director of the Consumer Protection Bureau of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, issued an article in the media, pointing out that Huabei and Jiebai infringed on the rights and interests of consumers.

The night of supervision came. In a few hours, the article four ministries and commissions interviewing senior ants read 100000 + in the official micro blog of the CSRC alone, and more than 10000 people praised it.

Ant group in the regulatory spotlight made an official response that night. It told Caijing that the actual controller of ant group and the relevant management have accepted the supervision interview of major regulatory departments. Ant group will thoroughly implement the interview opinions, continue to follow the 16 character guideline of sound innovation, embracing supervision, service entities, opening and win-win, continue to improve the ability of inclusive service, and help the economic and peoples livelihood development.

Just a week ago (on the evening of October 26), the initial IPO inquiry of ant group was completed. Ma Yun announced at the Bund financial summit that this would be the miracle of the largest listing in the history of mankind.

Ant groups final issuing price of a shares is 68.8 yuan per share. Influenced by the regulatory policy on the evening of the 2nd, ant groups business model changed. Its 2.1 trillion yuan market value ushered in a market dispute on the eve of listing. An executive of a fund company told Caijing on the same day that ant group was facing the problem of business model reconstruction.

On that night, the focus of the market was on the impact of the new deal on the stock price of ant after it was listed? The pre IPO busyness continues.

On the evening of November 3, a notice issued by the Shanghai Stock Exchange (hereinafter referred to as the Shanghai Stock Exchange) pressed the pause button for all this. Shanghai Stock Exchange informed ant group to suspend its A-share listing plan in Shanghai Stock Exchange. Affected by this, ant groups plan to simultaneously list H shares on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange will also be postponed.

The reason given by the Shanghai Stock Exchange is that recently, the actual controller, chairman and general manager of your company have been jointly supervised and interviewed by relevant departments, and your company has also reported major events such as changes in the regulatory environment of financial technology. This material event may cause your company to fail to meet the requirements of issuance and listing or information disclosure.

It is generally agreed that the financial technology regulatory environment referred to in the industry has changed, namely, the Interim Measures for small online loans issued by the Bank of China Insurance Regulatory Commission on the first day. The new regulations will greatly improve the compliance cost of ant group micro loan business, and then affect the business profit prospects and the rationality of IPO valuation.

From the late July when ant group announced to launch its listing plan, and in late October, the Securities Regulatory Commission approved the initial public offering (IPO) registration of ant groups science and technology innovation board. It took only three months for ant group to get the approval documents from its initial listing.

After three months of busy work, many employees of ant group realized the seriousness of the problem. According to the reporter of Finance and economics, on the night of being informed of the suspension of listing, ant group held an emergency meeting at the middle and high levels, aiming to stabilize the morale of the army and unify understanding.

Later, ant group in the official wechat to investors said: for the trouble caused to investors, ant group is very sorry. We will properly handle the follow-up work in accordance with the relevant rules of the two exchanges.

In fact, the advent of regulatory night is not without trace.

On October 24, Ma Yun, the actual controller of ant group, directly criticized financial regulation at the Shanghai Bund financial summit, saying that Basel Accord is like a club for the elderly, which aims to solve the aging and complex problems of the financial system which has operated for decades; China is not a financial systemic problem, but the risk of lack of a healthy financial system; and he reminds regulators that no The airport can be managed in the same way as the railway station, not in the future as it was yesterday.

On October 24, Ma Yun, the controller of ant group, criticized financial regulation at the Shanghai Bund financial summit, calling the Basel Accord like a club for the aged; and reminded regulators that we cant manage the airport by the way of managing railway stations, we cant manage the future by the way of yesterday. Figure / IC

Ma Yuns comments were hot and caused controversy for several days.

You know youre arbitraging, they know youre arbitraging, you know they know youre arbitraging, they know you know they know youre arbitraging, but youre not only arbitraging, you scold them. A melon eating crowd joked in the circle of friends.

A week later, on October 31, the meeting of the financial committee proposed to respect international consensus and rules, strengthen supervision, and fully incorporate financial activities into supervision according to law. Subsequently, the ant group was publicly placed in the regulatory spotlight.

In mid November, after several days after IPO listing reversal, the working state and rhythm of ant Z space, No. 556 Xixi Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, are just as normal as before, and the business is normal; in the evening, the overtime crowd is still busy in the light.

Although the silence of the past few months still makes people look forward to the building.

In response to strong supervision, ant group formally appointed Li Chen, vice president of ant group, as the groups compliance director during the double 11 period, reporting directly to CEO Hu Xiaoming. Industry insiders pointed out that the establishment of such a post is to show the worlds determination to do a good job in compliance.

Ants spear of innovation

A number of insiders told Caijing that the suspension of ant listing reflects that the regulatory authorities and the financial industry have reached a critical state of tolerance for potential risks brought by financial technology innovation and Internet giants.

Looking back on the rapid development history of the past 16 years, ants financial technology innovation began with Taobao.

In fact, cloud knows

Cant escape Taobaos prison

Every time I cry, I wake up for a second

Ill know

Im really tired

There are too many memories

hold one s breath

Love your heart, I have no place to deliver

If you can find you by climbing on the eaves

This also sows a seed for ant groups innovation in the field of financial technology. In the same year (2003) autumn, Alipay was quietly born on the industrial chain of Taobaos e-commerce platform business. It is worth noting that the first year of Alipay came out, the China UnionPay came out and helped banks gradually realize the transfer of bank cards.

Alipay, which did not connect with the Bank of China, though it was only a niche business at the time, has formed potential pressure on the traditional four party clearing mode and traditional payment institutions represented by banks, and laid a foreshadow for the subsequent regulatory new rules.

For the relationship between Taobao and Alipay, the ant group introduced in its prospectus, recall that we first set up Alipay, in order to solve the trust problem of transactions, so that strangers can do business even after thousands of miles away.

In the solution of the innovative ideas and technical support of transaction trust, Alipay has been developing all the way. In 2009, Alipay launched Alipay mobile terminal APP five years after its launch. In the following year, it launched fast payment, and launched a two-dimensional code payment product in 2011. At present, the market share of the third party mobile payment is over 50%.

In 2011, the central bank issued the first 27 third party payment licences, which Alipay covered. At the same time obtaining the license, the central bank meant that its payment business should be strictly regulated by financial supervision. Besides, the sweep code payment, which supported the share of its larger mobile payment, had experienced many stages of development, such as the initial stage, the regulatory halt, the continuous exploration and the restart.

The direct connection mode triggered by Alipay also ended with the establishment of the Internet Federation in 2017. The risk problem behind the end is that the payment institutions actually undertake the clearing work, trusteeship the funds in the bank, bypass the UnionPay, and realize direct connection with the bank, forming a unique tripartite mode, saving costs and bypassing the central banks supervision of payment and settlement.

Industry insiders said that Internet payment more or less has the direct connection bank mode, directly across the clearing this link. After cutting to the Internet connection, the payment institution and the bank are completely disconnected, and the clearing is done through the online connection, just as the bank does the clearing through the central bank system. Inter bank clearing has become centralized, and relevant business supervision can be controlled.

Some regulators once told Caijing that the trade-offs in the face of financial innovation are: on the one hand, for the financial innovation of Internet technology giants, regulators do not want to be labeled as hindering innovation, so they are once more inclusive; on the other hand, efficiency and risk are like twin brothers. At different stages, supervision needs to grasp the main contradictions in a specific period.

In the process of innovation, ant not only has a game with financial supervision, but also often confronts with traditional financial institutions, especially commercial banks.

In 2008, just in time for the financial crisis, Ma Yun said at the annual meeting of Chinese enterprise leaders held in Beijing that if the banks do not change, we will change the banks. At that time, the golden sentence once stung the nerves of many big banks, but we didnt really pay attention to it. Later, it turned out that the banking leaders were careless.

Because at that time, compared with the huge scale of banking business, Alipay was still niche, but its convenience and safety soon won the favor of consumers. Alipay has also become a fashion for young people.

In 2013, the amazing product yuebao was launched. Due to its extremely high profitability and liquidity, the cumulative trading users of the product exceeded 600 million by the end of 2018, and its scale once exceeded 2 trillion yuan, surpassing the personal deposit scale of Bank of communications, China Merchants Bank and Bank of China.

The scale of the rapid expansion of innovative products such as Alipay and Yu Ebao deeply touched the cheese of banks. Five years later, under financial supervision, financial technology companies returned to the source of science and technology, and commercial banks began to set up financial technology companies and launched a technology revitalization.

However, with traditional commercial banks and other payment institutions competing to follow suit, the scale of yuebao has declined year after year. According to the data of the third quarter report of 2020 released by Tianhong Yuebao money market fund on October 28, the scale of yuebao at the end of the third quarter was 1.19 trillion yuan, much smaller than that in the same period in 2018 and 2017.

In the field of financial management, at the end of 2016, the default of Qiaoxing bond triggered the early warning of financial innovation risk. As an important part of participation, zhaocaibao, a financial management platform of ant financial services, sold the split private equity bond products (qiaoxingbond) to public investors, breaking the regulatory provisions on the number of non-public offerings and the lower limit of investment, leading to the privatization of private placement. The overseas Chinese debt incident directly points out that the platform should not go beyond the intermediary function to re process and design products.

In March of the next year (2017), ant financial services (formerly known as ant financial) announced that it would only do tech (Technology) in the future, support financial institutions to do well in fin (Finance), from fintech to techfin, and in the future, it would only be a sales platform to provide technical and big data support for financial institutions.

Jing Xiandong, the then CEO of ant financial services, said in an exclusive interview with Caijing that ant financial was positioned as a technology company, helping partners with altruistic ideas to promote new finance. The new embodiment of new finance is new technology and more inclusive to the public, and techfin is the continuation of the above concept.

At the same time, Jing also said frankly, it is undeniable that in the previous tech, we wanted to access some financial product manufacturing. However, ant financials strong point is technology, which can complement each other by cooperating with financial enterprises. Therefore, we should step back and return to the position of tech, and fin has less things.

Compared with Ma Yuns high-profile remarks in 2008, ant financial services attitude towards financial institutions at this time is softer and more modest.

An in-depth study of ants industry pointed out that the lifeline of ants is innovation. All work of ants is carried out around innovation, but supervision is not the same. Therefore, to a certain extent, it can be considered that ants and supervision are in different value systems, and there will always be some controversial points between the two sides.

Ant thinks that it serves the lower level groups, which is dislocation development with banks, and the risk of business development is controllable. However, for supervision, ant is more innovative and controversial, and the responsibility of supervision is to supervise market entities. The above-mentioned people pointed out that the ants duty is to obey the corresponding supervision.

Some people in the industry also pointed out that in the development process of ants, there may be some regulatory and market disputes, but we also see the value and benefits that ants bring to the whole financial industry. The growth of ant groups business does not absolutely have a huge impact on the financial industry, but also forms a growth of dislocation with the bank.

The shield of regulatory risk control

With the release of the new regulations on small loans on the Internet, the controversy between ant group and financial supervision has become a consensus.

The Interim Measures for small loans on the Internet was actually soliciting opinions before. This time, it was published in a hurry. It was really aimed at the ants. Several insiders close to the regulation told Caijing that the restrictions on leverage in the new regulations are the biggest blow to ant group, and they are also ridiculed by the industry as hitting the snake to seven inches.

The Interim Measures for small online loans limit the external financing leverage ratio of small loan companies to 5 times, that is, the balance of non-standard financing (bank loans, shareholder loans, etc.) of small online loan companies shall not exceed one time of net assets; the balance of standardized financing (bonds, asset securitization products, etc.) shall not exceed 4 times of net assets. At the same time, in a single joint loan, the contribution proportion of small loan companies operating network small loan business shall not be less than 30%.

Previously, as joint loans were not included in the scope of leverage, the leverage ratio was not calculated in the statement through asset-backed securities (ABS). As a result, some small online loan companies leverage the excessive loan scale with lower registered capital, which is also the case with ant group.

According to the prospectus of ant group, in the first half of 2020, ant groups micro loan technology platform contributed to a total credit balance of 2.15 trillion yuan. Among them, the consumer credit balance represented by Huabei and jiebei (the main bodies are Chongqing ant small and micro loan Co., Ltd. and Chongqing ant Shangcheng small loan Co., Ltd.) amounts to 1.73 trillion yuan. It is worth noting that in the credit balance promoted by the micro loan technology platform, the proportion of actual loans or asset securitization realized by financial institutions is about 98%.

For this reason, in the view of most people in the financial industry, it is a correct choice for the regulatory authorities to suspend the listing of ant group, because if the risks hidden in its business are not revealed at this time, the interests of investors will not be effectively protected.

Chinas economy may continue to boom for a long time, but it is impossible to avoid a time when there is a correction and setback. On the surface, once the ABS asset package is sold, the buyer assumes the risk, which has nothing to do with ants, and the risk seems very small. Before 2007, the U.S. banking industry actually thought so. But the whole financial system is connected, and the losses and holes have to be filled by someone, ants or someone else. In the end, it will spread to the whole banking industry, which is the so-called systemic crisis. Some senior people in the financial industry have stressed that risks will never be eliminated but transferred. Ant group can only transfer the risk, absolutely can not eliminate the risk, can hide and delay the risk at most, but if it erupts at the same time, it may lead to terrible systemic risk. And the risk transferred, the ultimate payer is likely to be the ordinary people.

Like both sides of a coin, ant group as a representative of the big technology risk control is also considered by the industry as an effective path for Inclusive Finance. Huang Yiping, vice president of the National Development Research Institute of Peking University, said in an interview with the reporter of Finance and economics that as a part of financial data risk control, big technology credit refers to large technology companies providing credit services for small and medium-sized and micro enterprises or individual businesses by using large science and technology ecosystems and data risk control models, as well as innovative credit risk management framework.

In the research report led by him, through the comparison of samples, it is found that the large-scale science and technology credit has a higher degree of adaptability with small-scale, short-term credit history, small and medium-sized enterprises. In view of this, Yiping, a small and medium-sized enterprise, is considered to be a more reliable path for small and medium-sized enterprises to find a more reliable risk control path than the traditional technology bank.

A senior person in the financial technology industry stressed to the reporter of Caijing that the risk control of traditional finance mainly uses the financial data with strong credit attribute, and uses the score to identify the repayment ability and willingness of customers. In contrast, big data risk control of fintech companies does not completely change the traditional risk control, but actually enriches the data dimension of traditional risk control. However, big data risk control is not omnipotent. It solves the problem of credit risk rather than financial risk.

Another concern of supervision is that when the risk is excessively concentrated on the actual controller of private enterprises, what kind of impact will be brought if the risk breaks out. Authorities close to the central bank have expressed similar concerns, ant group, after all, is a private enterprise, but it serves so many users. If there is a big problem, the risk is actually concentrated on one person (Ma Yun), and the impact or risk is completely uncontrollable.

In addition to the above problems, the ant group monopoly and invasion of personal privacy, which are frequently mentioned by market participants in recent years, are also regarded as two major concerns of supervision.

On November 2, Guo Wuping, director of the consumer rights and Interests Protection Bureau of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC), wrote an article, pointing out that when the regulatory authorities investigate and punish licensed financial institutions, they should also carry out extended investigations into relevant financial technology companies. In view of oligopoly, we should organize and carry out consumer questionnaire survey on whether there is abuse of market dominant position by relevant companies. We should strengthen the law enforcement and justice of anti-monopoly and anti unfair competition, prevent the winners from taking all and big shops bullying customers, and infringe on consumers right of independent choice and fair trade.

Li Qing, a researcher at the China Economic System Reform Research Association, and others believe that the abuse of market dominance in the anti-monopoly law includes two elements, one of which is indispensable. One is that the enterprise has a dominant position in the relevant market, which needs to be determined by many factors such as whether the enterprise can determine the transaction conditions (such as price and quantity), or it can be inferred by market share. Second, enterprises have abused this dominant position, such as unfair high price and low price, refusal to trade, designated transaction, tied sale and so on.

Li Qing and others believe that the data obtained from them show that in 2019, Alipay and WeChat paid no market share in mobile phone payment in China, and the market share of an operator in the relevant market reached 1/2.

On November 10, the State Administration of market supervision and Administration issued the anti-monopoly guidelines in the field of platform economy (Draft for comments), which put forward the important principles of creating a fair competition order, aiming to prevent and stop monopoly behaviors in the field of platform economy. On the day of the release of the draft, the stock price of large technology platform companies fell sharply.

Although there are some laws and regulations in the domestic protection of personal privacy, the implementation rules and executive power are still in short supply. Most internet financial companies have great motivation to conduct credit evaluation and risk pricing, ignoring the right to know and privacy of individual consumers, or even using a series of tools such as sesame credit and Alipay. Industry influence forms financial oppression. Ji Shaofeng said frankly that the use of advanced information technology by large Internet enterprises often brings great difficulties to the regulatory authorities in risk identification, business supervision and risk disposal. Therefore, from the regulatory point of view, it is also in line with the regulatory mentality to cut technology services and financial business, and conduct classified management for more pure financial business itself and corresponding financial behavior.

In fact, financial regulators have been releasing strong regulatory signals in the early stage.

In September 2019, fan Yifei, vice president of the peoples Bank of China, made a very serious speech at the 9th China payment and clearing forum. He said: for some time, some Internet enterprises have used their institutions to cross nest payment business with other financial businesses such as credit, forming a business closed loop. The business processing process is difficult to be penetrated and supervised, and it is very easy to cause risk spread across the market. At the same time, he stressed that such institutions did not fully understand and grasp the risk nature and business boundary of financial business, and hoped that they actively cooperate with supervision, effectively rectify the credit business beyond the scope of business, and eliminate the potential risks of expanding cross financial business through payment.

In the view of the industry, this is the ant group.

Huabei, Jiebai and Baitiao have been successfully operated for seven or eight years, and the non-performing rate has been well controlled. This is a high-quality asset verified by the market. A head financial technology company told Caijing that small and medium-sized banks just lack good assets, so in the process of joint loans, head financial technology companies are relatively stronger.

The person further pointed out: small and medium-sized banks are weak in risk control, especially in dealing with online business. In fact, it is a problem whether these small and medium-sized banks have the ability to do online risk control, which should be borne by the joint loan according to the proportion of capital contribution.

In the eyes of regulators, the fact that there is no risk at present does not mean that there will be no risk in the future. With the demonstration effect of ant groups joint loan business, many financial science and technology enterprises have made great efforts, corresponding to the rapid expansion of scale, whether the bottom line of risk control can be completely bet on a technical line, which makes people less and less bottomless.

Ants current business, most of which are not even joint loans, is a complete loan assistance mode, that is to say, it does not pay its own money at all. Its role in the business is to provide customer flow, provide risk control, provide post loan services and so on. In essence, everything is provided and controlled by ant, and the only thing is that the money is not provided by itself. A senior risk controller also told Caijing that (ANT) its role here is to charge service fee , not to earn interest margin, that is to say, pure off balance sheet business, which is also the root cause of the fact that it is not subject to leverage constraints to a certain extent. If such businesses are not unified into the regulatory perspective, given that the real risk is still completely controlled by it, it is still completely responsible for it Its not responsible, so its more dangerous.

In July this year, the investigation and Statistics Department of the central bank issued the urgent notice on the investigation of online joint consumer loans to all banks, requiring them to report the data of online joint loans. Among them, the cooperation data with ant Huabei and ant borrowing was specially distinguished. Its hard for the authorities to jointly supervise the loans. Su Xiaorui, a senior researcher at the hemp bag Research Institute, analyzed the reporter of Caijing.

In fact, in the IPO prospectus, ant group did not disclose the details of the joint loan. In addition to the overall scale of consumer credit and the overall contribution proportion of ant group, more detailed information such as the specific partners, the proportion of joint loans, and the proportion of joint loans still remain a mystery.

Its not easy for regulators to grasp the details of ant groups cooperation with banks, which may make them feel very anxious. The aforementioned financial technology personage analyzes to the reporter of finance and economics that is why (the supervision) is the only way to deal with the joint loan.

According to the reporter of Caijing, many experts and scholars have other opinions on the current practice of supervision. There is no problem in controlling leverage, but what is the reasonable proportion of investment? Is there a timetable for eliminating regulatory inequality? These are all worth discussing.

Since March 2017, ant group announced that it would only do tech (Technology) in the future and support financial institutions to do well in fin (Finance), it has positioned its role in financial science and technology as a consignment platform to provide technical and big data support for financial institutions.

Based on the above technology platform positioning mode, ant group completed a balance loan of 2.15 trillion yuan (mainly relying on the joint loan and loan assistance mode). But obviously, ant groups positioning of this technology platform failed to evade the sword of financial regulation.

Some analysts pointed out that if according to the requirement that the proportion of capital contribution should not be less than 30% in the new regulations on small loans on the Internet, ant group needs to raise the registered capital of its small loan company to 100 billion yuan. In the eyes of financial regulators, ant groups technology intermediary role can not erase its financial intermediary platform attribute.

According to the financial attributes of fintech, all financial activities should be brought into the scope of unified supervision. Liu Fushou, chief lawyer of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, once again clarified the concept of financial technology and regulatory rules in his speech at the State Councils regular policy briefing earlier this month.

In the previous IPO, ant groups price per share was 68.8 yuan, with a static P / E ratio of nearly 100 times, which was equivalent to the valuation of technology stocks, and its technology attribute was recognized by the capital market. Nevertheless, questions such as lending companies in the guise of science and technology, making money in finance and taking the valuation of technology have been accompanied by ants. Industry insiders pointed out that with the financial commission special meeting and a series of regulatory voices on financial innovation and financial technology, ant groups positioning may change.

On October 31, less than a week after Ma Yuns shelling financial regulation on the Bund, the special meeting of the financial commission proposed that financial activities should be fully regulated in accordance with the law and that the same businesses and entities should be treated equally. Afterwards, the content of the meeting was considered to be the regulatory setting for the follow-up of financial technology and financial innovation.

Some senior people in the financial industry believe that the core of the new small loan regulation is actually to require ant group to increase the proportion of its own capital contribution. In this way, if there is a risk, the ant itself will bear a lot of risk. In this way, ants can carry out business more carefully and reduce the possible losses of financial institutions.

Small measures by the ant group is not limited to the temporary. In the view of some industry insiders, the Interim Measures for small online loans are not so much for ant group, but for bigtech company and its joint loan business similar to ant group.

In Ji Shaofengs view, the Interim Measures for small online loans will also put pressure on bigtech, which is engaged in similar joint lending business. In fact, several drafts of the draft for comments on the Interim Measures for small loans on the Internet have been drafted. This time, it was announced in advance before the promulgation of the regulations on non deposit lending organizations and other higher level laws. This is because financial technology is running too fast, and supervision has certain concerns and is necessary.

Finance and economics reporter learned from a number of people in the industry, including Du Xiaoman finance, Jingdong digital branch, 360 digital branch, etc., all of which carry out joint loan business through their network small loan companies. The issuance of the Interim Measures for small online loans will also have an impact on the corresponding businesses of these companies, which will face certain transformation pressure. However, compared with ant group, the business scale of these institutions is relatively small.

Generally speaking, financial technology companies that carry out joint lending business through Internet small loan licenses are divided into head, waist and tail. The head is represented by ant group, while the waist is represented by Du Xiaoman, Jingdong digital technology, 360 digital technology and didi finance. The tail is mainly some P2P transformed companies. The person in charge of a financial technology company carrying out the joint loan business told Caijing that the new rules will mainly bring a fatal blow to many bottom players, while for the head company, it mainly limits its development scale.

With regard to the compliance and supervision of technology enterprises in the name of various financial services, Che Ning, Deputy Secretary General of Beijing Network Law Research Association, believes that the current discussions are either focused on the relationship between regulation, arbitrage and innovation, or on the basis of valuation. The real problem is not only to supervise the technology enterprises in the financial field, but also to comprehensively evaluate the impact of the current background, determine its real and appropriate functional positioning, and then build a governance framework for the future.

There is no doubt that in the face of the increasingly complex international and domestic development environment, encouraging scientific and technological innovation and promoting the core position of the real economy in Chinas overall modernization drive will continue to be upheld. Based on this, Che Ning pointed out that in this sense, the financial technology surname Jin or technology is not the main aspect of the contradiction. We need to see that the positioning of financial capital is a means rather than an end, and the key is to effectively prevent and control risks on the basis of the realization of economic and social functions, in place without dislocation, which also requires regulatory innovation.

Ji Shaofeng believes that the public opinion caused by the ant incident goes far beyond the scope of Finance and supervision. From this, it extends to the questioning of its commercial monopoly, the moral trial of seizing high interest rates, and the dissatisfaction of the public on Chinas inclusive financial system and small and micro financial services of banks. The deeper thinking also touches on the publics opinion on the allocation and supervision of financial resources of state-owned banks and private finance The unfair status of treatment and the worry about the market status of private enterprises.

Ma Yun argued that the bank did not mention the pain points of Chinas finance, because no one is an encyclopedia and there is no omnipotent God. The most fundamental problem in Chinas finance is not pawnshop thought, not Basel agreement, but the uneven allocation of resources brought about by the dual system and the credit failure faced by private enterprises and small and micro enterprises. Ji Shaofeng said bluntly that Chinas financial technology companies should not be subversive and revolutionary to Chinas financial industry, but should be co-workers and menders. It is competition and cooperation rather than confrontation. This is determined by the economic structure of Chinas ownership system and has nothing to do with technology. Through the innovation of financial technology, private financial capital promotes Chinas banking industry to be more open and equal, to better serve industries and micro businesses. Financial technology companies and private financial capital use the flexibility of the mechanism and the advantages of being close to the market. They should join hands with banks in the system to make progress, and at the same time, they will gradually increase the share and credibility of private capital in the financial market This is the real choice.

IPO prospect and valuation adjustment

Financial technology supervision changes, countless people sigh: if ant group wants to go public as it is, it is not easy!

Some people in the industry pointed out that there is a possibility that ant group will restructure its business and split its listing. It is not ruled out that the financial services such as payment, small loan and fund sales will be separated. However, this involves very complex business structure and equity changes, which can not be completed overnight. Even if there is no spin off in the end, there may be new changes in the original businesses, and the business scale and risk control system will be different.

According to the original plan, ant was priced at 68.8 yuan per share. The total market value of ant group was 2.1 trillion yuan, more than double the previous round of financing valuation. A + H shares raised the highest or more than 260 billion yuan, setting a new record for the largest IPO in the world. The unprecedented enthusiasm of investors also shows the recognition of this valuation.

But after the night of regulation on November 2, everything came to nothing. Many industry insiders told Caijing that the logic of ant groups valuation has changed, and there is uncertainty about when to IPO again in the future.

Zhang Xiaorong, President of the Institute of deep science and technology, told Caijing that ant groups 2.15 trillion yuan loan mainly relies on the joint loan and loan assistance mode. If the proportion of investment specified in the new regulations on small online loans should not be less than 30%, this means that the capital of ant group will be supplemented to hundreds of billion yuan according to the new regulations on small online loans. This number will put a lot of pressure on the ants, which will not only greatly reduce their loan space, but also their profit margins.

According to the reporter of finance and economics, in view of the fact that the growth rate of ant groups performance is almost certain to decline, many people in the industry believe that the valuation of ant group will inevitably be lowered, but the difference lies in the reduction range.

Ji Shaofeng, a senior small and micro credit personage, said bluntly: as half of ants profits come from highly leveraged credit business, the new rules will directly reduce ants credit related profit of 10 billion yuan to about 4 billion yuan, corresponding to the valuation of 2 trillion yuan, the direct valuation will drop below 1.5 trillion yuan.

However, more views believe that the formal draft of the new regulations on small online loans has not yet been published, and the impact of changes in regulatory conditions on ant performance remains to be observed.

A researcher who keeps following ant group told Caijing: ant group used to be based on the valuation of technology companies. In the future (valuation), the attributes of Finance and technology will be considered, especially if it may change from light capital to heavy capital business.

Ant group, a brokerage Research Institute, had previously given a valuation of nearly 1.8 trillion yuan. Corresponding to its profit forecast in 2021, it is about 36 times PE. The specific valuation logic is as follows: in terms of digital payment and business services, it benchmarked with PayPal, an overseas payment giant; in terms of digital financial technology micro loan technology platform business, it referred to consumer finance companies such as lending club and 360 finance; the financial technology platform benchmarked Jiaxin wealth management and Oriental Wealth, one of the largest online securities brokers in the United States; and the insurance technology platform referred to risk management in the United States And the insurance brokerage company.

The three core standards of ant groups valuation in the future are: the core technical capability, the close combination of technology and finance, and the development expectation of future profit growth. I think it still needs to see whether ants business is greatly affected after financial supervision. Wang Pengbo, a senior financial analyst in the financial industry, said, if the valuation is based on financial stocks, the ants financial logic is not taken into account. It has developed financial business on the basis of science and technology.

In addition to valuation, another issue that attracts public attention is when ants can restart IPO?

On November 17, at the third innovation economy forum, Fang Xinghai, vice chairman of China Securities Regulatory Commission, said that whether ant group has a timetable for listing depends on how the government reorganizes the regulatory framework for financial technology enterprises, and how companies respond to the regulatory environment.

According to Wang Jiyue, a senior investment banker, after the IPO is suspended, ant group should first come up with a preliminary compliance plan. Secondly, it should wait for the draft of Interim Measures for small loans on the Internet to come to the ground to see whether it needs to be adjusted. Thirdly, it needs to obtain regulatory approval and adjust its business to compliance. Finally, it has to re apply for the approval of the CSRC of the stock exchange for issuance, which does not exclude re listing. Of course, the annual report and the prospectus need to be updated.

A fund executive told Caijing that the time may be more than a year. If an enterprise can not be listed because of major issues, it will take at least six months before it can report new materials, so I think the deadline should be one year.

However, over time, people are more pessimistic about the ant groups IPO restart schedule. The expectation of an investment bank who would not be named has been extended to more than five years. When ants start listing again in the future, the performance period required in their prospectus may need to be all under the new regulatory policy. The IPO needs to disclose the performance information of the three-year period, considering the time required by the previous policies and the time required to complete the listing process later, it will be five years later for ants to complete the listing again.

He explained to Caijing: of course, the estimated restart time is based on maintaining the existing business structure. If we divest the network micro loan business which is greatly affected by the new regulatory policies, it may shorten the time to restart listing.

However, some people in the industry have expressed different views. Even if the network micro loan business is separated and listed separately, the speed of listing may not be accelerated. If we want to split up, we need to withdraw the application for re declaration after adjustment, involving major asset restructuring, major changes in statements during the reporting period, which need to be adjusted, and so on, which will take longer. Wang Jiyue said.

Previously, Chongqing ant Consumer Finance Co., Ltd., which is 50% owned by ant group, was approved for construction in September this year. According to the reporter of Caijing, in addition to setting up a chief compliance officer, ant groups businesses and departments related to micro loans are facing a more difficult situation. On the one hand, they are waiting for the new regulations to be formally implemented, and on the other hand, they are also trying to find ways to adjust them.

Although there are different opinions on the specific timetable, many people agree that the release time of the new online small loan regulation will be the key factor affecting the IPO restart time of ant group. What ants can do at present is to rectify and wait. In March this year, the Shanghai Stock Exchange issued the Interim Provisions on the listing declaration and recommendation of enterprises on the science and Technology Innovation Board of Shanghai Stock Exchange, which clearly states that other enterprises in the field of deep application of scientific and technological innovation in line with the positioning of the science and technology innovation board, such as financial technology, science and technology services, also belong to the scope of science and technology innovation board services. The regulation is regarded as a friendly signal sent by the science and technology innovation board to financial technology enterprises. It is worth noting that the Shanghai Stock Exchange recently announced through the securities times that it has re applied for the positioning of the science and technology innovation board, saying that it supports and encourages more hard technology enterprises to go public. (the author is a reporter from Caijing, Yang Xiuhong and an intern Zhou Qing also contributed to this article) source of this article: Chen Hequn, editor in charge of the Financial Association_ NB12679

Although there are different opinions on the specific timetable, many people agree that the release time of the new online small loan regulation will be the key factor affecting the IPO restart time of ant group. What ants can do at present is to rectify and wait.

In March this year, the Shanghai Stock Exchange issued the Interim Provisions on the listing declaration and recommendation of enterprises on the science and Technology Innovation Board of Shanghai Stock Exchange, which clearly states that other enterprises in the field of deep application of scientific and technological innovation in line with the positioning of the science and technology innovation board, such as financial technology, science and technology services, also belong to the scope of science and technology innovation board services. The regulation is regarded as a friendly signal sent by the science and technology innovation board to financial technology enterprises. It is worth noting that the Shanghai Stock Exchange recently announced through the securities times that it has re applied for the positioning of the science and technology innovation board, saying that it supports and encourages more hard technology enterprises to go public.

(the author is a reporter from Caijing, Yang Xiuhong and intern Zhou Qing also contributed to this article.)