The brother-in-law suspected collusion with outsiders to transfer 11 million property, and the lawyer was charged with intentional injury on behalf of her sister

category:Hot
 The brother-in-law suspected collusion with outsiders to transfer 11 million property, and the lawyer was charged with intentional injury on behalf of her sister


On February 20, 2019, the judicial appraisal institution issued the appraisal report, and Liang was of grade II minor injury. /Photos provided by interviewees

One

Her husband lost 11 million shares and asked his wife to share the debt

For her husband Zhang Yunfan was accused of intentional injury, Ma Xiqi, who was a law student, always resented her. She clearly protected her sister and wife, and had no subjective intention.

After the event, I suggested that my sister should ask Liang for a list of losses, but Liang never said the details of the loss. Ask to Cao Mous husband and wife, also cant obtain loss proof all the time Macciqi said that afterwards, they learned that Liang was actually the operator of Cao and his wife. Therefore, it is suspected that Liang colluded with outsiders to transfer property.

In September 2018, Cao and his wife took Liang and Zhang to court, demanding repayment of more than 6 million yuan in arrears. According to Shanghai First Intermediate Peoples Court (2020) Hu 01 min Zhong No. 253 civil judgment, the court of first instance held that Zhang should not bear the 6.1 million yuan debt claimed by Cao and his wife, and the debt should be borne by Liang. Houliangs appeal was rejected by the court. According to the investigation of the court, Liang and Cao had more than 40 million yuan of flowing water between them,

On July 13, 2016, Zhang transferred 5 million yuan to Liang, and Liang used it for stock speculation. /Photos provided by interviewees

Two

Conflict with brother-in-law lawyer charged with intentional injury

My husband didnt feel at ease that day, so he went with us, she said. After arriving at the place, Zhang saw Liang standing in front of a BMW sports car, and began to take photos with his mobile phone and asked to see Liangs backpack. Liang and Zhang fought for the backpack and tried to snatch the mobile phone for taking photos. Zhang Yunfan was afraid that his sister would be hurt, so he hugged Liang and fell to the ground together. During this period, Zhang Yunfan did not beat Liang. He just kept him from getting up. After we left the scene, Zhang Yunfan released Liang

According to the indictment, Zhang Yunfan refused to confess to the above-mentioned criminal acts after he was arrested by the public security organ on June 13. During this period, the investigators mentioned that we could communicate with Liang and obtain Liangs understanding. However, the condition proposed by Liang is that he must share more than 6 million debts with him, and the 5 million yuan previously taken from Zhang Mou Ying will not be returned. Ms. Maggie said that because of no understanding, she posted the whole story of the incident through her microblog in September this year, hoping that the onlookers would testify for her husband.

On September 1, 2020, Zhang Yunfan was arrested on suspicion of intentional injury. /Photos provided by interviewees

3. Disability appraisal refers to the partys self injury

According to the appraisal opinion of Shanghai Fenglin Judicial Appraisal Co., Ltd. issued by the prosecution, on January 12, 2019, the radiation diagnosis report of Shanghai Minhang District Central Hospital recorded that no obvious dislocation fracture was found on the right ribs of Liang. However, according to the hospitals records on January 23, 2019, the cortical folds of the fourth to sixth ribs on the right side of Liang. Combined with the case introduction, medical history and forensic examination, the comprehensive evaluation showed that the third to sixth rib fracture on the right side of Liang was caused by trauma, which constituted grade II minor injury.

As for the appraisal opinion, Zhang Yunfan once mentioned in the record, when I pressed him, I pressed Liang with my hand, and my knee was on the ground all the time. Later, I ran into the car. My wife was driving, but before the car moved, Liang threw himself on the car cover. At that time, I heard him Dong on the car. Later, I got out of the car and pulled him away by the shoulder

In this regard, Zhang Yunfans defense lawyer said that even if Liangs fracture was formed on the day of the crime, it could not be ruled out that it was the reasonable suspicion caused by the collision with the front of the car and the causal relationship between Zhang Yunfans involvement in the case. If it is Liang who bumps into the front of the car and causes injury, it is Liangs self injurious behavior. In addition, no fracture was found in Liang on the day of the crime, and cortical wrinkles were diagnosed 11 days after the case. As the main basis for identification, Zhang Yunfans defense lawyer also said in court that he could not be diagnosed by CT film 11 days after the crime, and confirmed that the behavior involved was the only cause of Liangs fracture.

Zhang Yunfans defense lawyer also said that the case was caused by family conflicts, and Liang also had certain faults. Zhang Yunfan did not hurt Liang intentionally. Even if the collegiate bench thinks that Zhang Yunfan has subjective intention, it should be an administrative case, not a criminal case, because of its slight plot and small social harm.

On the day of the crime, Liangs medical report showed that there was no obvious dislocation fracture. 11 days later, Liang went to see the doctor again, and the report showed that the rib cortex was wrinkled. /Photos provided by interviewees

The prosecution proposed a sentence of one year and six months

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }For the opinions of Zhang Yunfan and his defense lawyers, the prosecution provided relevant evidence such as the confessions of the victims Liang, Zhang Yunfan and Zhang Yiying, and inquired about Zhang Yunfans stopping Liangs behavior in court. The prosecution believes that Zhang Yunfan, the defendant, intentionally injured others and caused slight injury to one person. His behavior violated the relevant provisions of the criminal law. The facts of the crime are clear and the evidence is sufficient. Therefore, he should be investigated for his criminal responsibility with the crime of intentional injury. As for the question raised by Zhang Yunfan and his defense lawyers on the expert opinion, the prosecution believes that the relevant evidence obtained by the judicial organ according to law, the content is objective and true, the form is legal and effective, and has relevance with the case, which can prove the fact that the defendant Zhang Yunfan injured the victim Liang. The prosecution also held that the defendant refused to plead guilty in court, pleaded in various ways, and had a bad attitude. He suggested that the sentence be meted out for one year and six months. The trial lasted nearly seven hours and no sentence was delivered in court. Before the court session, the upstream news reporter had contacted the victim Liang Mou. After being asked whether it was Zhang Yunfans brother-in-law, Liang hung up the phone. On October 20, a lawyer acting for Liang said that he would not accept an interview or make a judgment on the case for the time being. Source: editor in charge of upstream news: Qin bailing_ NB17208

As for the opinions of Zhang Yunfan and his defense lawyers, the prosecution provided relevant evidence such as the confessions of the victims Liang, Zhang Yunfan and Zhang Xiaoying, and inquired about Zhang Yunfans stopping Liangs behavior in court. The prosecution believes that Zhang Yunfan, the defendant, intentionally injured others and caused slight injury to one person. His behavior violated the relevant provisions of the criminal law. The facts of the crime are clear and the evidence is sufficient. Therefore, he should be investigated for his criminal responsibility with the crime of intentional injury.

As for the question raised by Zhang Yunfan and his defense lawyers on the expert opinion, the prosecution believes that the relevant evidence obtained by the judicial organ according to law, the content is objective and true, the form is legal and effective, and has relevance with the case, which can prove the fact that the defendant Zhang Yunfan injured the victim Liang. The prosecution also held that the defendant refused to plead guilty in court, pleaded in various ways, and had a bad attitude. He suggested that the sentence be meted out for one year and six months.