The brother-in-law suspected collusion with outsiders to transfer 11 million property, and the lawyer was charged with intentional injury on behalf of her sister

category:Hot
 The brother-in-law suspected collusion with outsiders to transfer 11 million property, and the lawyer was charged with intentional injury on behalf of her sister


On February 20, 2019, the judicial appraisal institution issued the appraisal report, and Liang was of grade II minor injury. /Photos provided by interviewees

One

For her husband Zhang Yunfan was accused of intentional injury, Ma Xiqi, who was a law student, always resented her. She clearly protected her sister and wife, and had no subjective intention.

Zhang Yunfans sister, Zhang Zhaoying, told upstream reporters that she and Liang got married in 2009, and Liang has not been working for more than 10 years after their marriage. The expenses of the whole family and Liangs parents are supported by Zhangs pre marriage savings. In 2016, Liang claimed that he knew the mysterious man of the stock market, Mr. and Mrs. Cao. They had a special channel of new share allotment to make a steady profit. At Liangs repeated request, Zhang sold all the stocks in his stock account, combined with his own savings, and pooled 5 million yuan to Liang for stock speculation. Soon after, Liang claimed that by operating the account number of Cao and his wife, Liang not only lost all 5 million yuan, but also owed Cao and his wife 6 million yuan, a total loss of 11 million yuan.

After the event, I suggested that my sister should ask Liang for a list of losses, but Liang never said the details of the loss. Ask to Cao Mous husband and wife, also cant obtain loss proof all the time Macciqi said that afterwards, they learned that Liang was actually the operator of Cao and his wife. Therefore, it is suspected that Liang colluded with outsiders to transfer property.

In September 2018, Cao and his wife took Liang and Zhang to court, demanding repayment of more than 6 million yuan in arrears. According to Shanghai First Intermediate Peoples Court (2020) Hu 01 min Zhong No. 253 civil judgment, the court of first instance held that Zhang should not bear the 6.1 million yuan debt claimed by Cao and his wife, and the debt should be borne by Liang. Houliangs appeal was rejected by the court. According to the investigation of the court, Liang and Cao had more than 40 million yuan of flowing water between them,

On October 20, in view of the debt, upstream journalists repeatedly called Cao and his wife, but none of them answered.

On July 13, 2016, Zhang transferred 5 million yuan to Liang, and Liang used it for stock speculation. /Photos provided by interviewees

Two

Conflict with brother-in-law lawyer charged with intentional injury

A family dispute eventually turned into a lawsuit between husband and wife. In Zhangs opinion, this is not a glorious thing, but his savings have been lost, and he is unwilling. On January 12, 2019, Zhang and Mai Xiqi found Liangs residence, hoping to find evidence of Liangs malicious collusion to transfer property, but they did not expect to lead to a conflict.

My husband didnt feel at ease that day, so he went with us, she said. After arriving at the place, Zhang saw Liang standing in front of a BMW sports car, and began to take photos with his mobile phone and asked to see Liangs backpack. Liang and Zhang fought for the backpack and tried to snatch the mobile phone for taking photos. Zhang Yunfan was afraid that his sister would be hurt, so he hugged Liang and fell to the ground together. During this period, Zhang Yunfan did not beat Liang. He just kept him from getting up. After we left the scene, Zhang Yunfan released Liang

Later, Liang gave an alarm. According to the indictment, at 16:00 on January 12, 2019, Zhang Yunfan, in order to help Zhang Yiying snatch the victims belongings, controlled the victim Liang with his bare hands, causing both sides to fall to the ground, and then used his knee to press the victims chest to hurt him. After identification, the third, fourth, fifth, sixth front rib fracture of the victim Liang Mous right side constituted the second level of minor injury.

According to the indictment, Zhang Yunfan refused to confess to the above-mentioned criminal acts after he was arrested by the public security organ on June 13. During this period, the investigators mentioned that we could communicate with Liang and obtain Liangs understanding. However, the condition proposed by Liang is that he must share more than 6 million debts with him, and the 5 million yuan previously taken from Zhang Mou Ying will not be returned. Ms. Maggie said that because of no understanding, she posted the whole story of the incident through her microblog in September this year, hoping that the onlookers would testify for her husband.

On September 1, 2020, Zhang Yunfan was arrested on suspicion of intentional injury. /Photos provided by interviewees

On October 19, the case was heard in the peoples Court of Songjiang District, Shanghai. According to the surveillance video broadcast in the court, Zhang Yunfan pushed Liang to the ground at the time of the crime. After Zhang and Mai Xiqi left, Zhang Yunfan released Liang and left. There was no act of beating Liang.

As for the appraisal opinion, Zhang Yunfan once mentioned in the record, when I pressed him, I pressed Liang with my hand, and my knee was on the ground all the time. Later, I ran into the car. My wife was driving, but before the car moved, Liang threw himself on the car cover. At that time, I heard him Dong on the car. Later, I got out of the car and pulled him away by the shoulder

The prosecution proposed a sentence of one year and six months

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }For the opinions of Zhang Yunfan and his defense lawyers, the prosecution provided relevant evidence such as the confessions of the victims Liang, Zhang Yunfan and Zhang Yiying, and inquired about Zhang Yunfans stopping Liangs behavior in court. The prosecution believes that Zhang Yunfan, the defendant, intentionally injured others and caused slight injury to one person. His behavior violated the relevant provisions of the criminal law. The facts of the crime are clear and the evidence is sufficient. Therefore, he should be investigated for his criminal responsibility with the crime of intentional injury. As for the question raised by Zhang Yunfan and his defense lawyers on the expert opinion, the prosecution believes that the relevant evidence obtained by the judicial organ according to law, the content is objective and true, the form is legal and effective, and has relevance with the case, which can prove the fact that the defendant Zhang Yunfan injured the victim Liang. The prosecution also held that the defendant refused to plead guilty in court, pleaded in various ways, and had a bad attitude. He suggested that the sentence be meted out for one year and six months. The trial lasted nearly seven hours and no sentence was delivered in court. Before the court session, the upstream news reporter had contacted the victim Liang Mou. After being asked whether it was Zhang Yunfans brother-in-law, Liang hung up the phone. On October 20, a lawyer acting for Liang said that he would not accept an interview or make a judgment on the case for the time being. Source: editor in charge of upstream news: Qin bailing_ NB17208

As for the opinions of Zhang Yunfan and his defense lawyers, the prosecution provided relevant evidence such as the confessions of the victims Liang, Zhang Yunfan and Zhang Xiaoying, and inquired about Zhang Yunfans stopping Liangs behavior in court. The prosecution believes that Zhang Yunfan, the defendant, intentionally injured others and caused slight injury to one person. His behavior violated the relevant provisions of the criminal law. The facts of the crime are clear and the evidence is sufficient. Therefore, he should be investigated for his criminal responsibility with the crime of intentional injury.

As for the question raised by Zhang Yunfan and his defense lawyers on the expert opinion, the prosecution believes that the relevant evidence obtained by the judicial organ according to law, the content is objective and true, the form is legal and effective, and has relevance with the case, which can prove the fact that the defendant Zhang Yunfan injured the victim Liang. The prosecution also held that the defendant refused to plead guilty in court, pleaded in various ways, and had a bad attitude. He suggested that the sentence be meted out for one year and six months.

The trial lasted nearly seven hours and no sentence was delivered in court. Before the court session, the upstream news reporter had contacted the victim Liang Mou. After being asked whether it was Zhang Yunfans brother-in-law, Liang hung up the phone. On October 20, a lawyer acting for Liang said that he would not accept an interview or make a judgment on the case for the time being.