International criticism of coercive diplomacy will eventually lead American politicians into extreme isolation

 International criticism of coercive diplomacy will eventually lead American politicians into extreme isolation

In the past year, whether U.S. Secretary of state pompeio is visiting Europe, the Middle East or Latin America, defamation of China has always been the core issue. For example, when pompeio visited Latin America earlier this month, he explicitly asked Suriname and Guyana to choose between China and the United States. In Europe, whether he attended the Copenhagen summit on democracy or later visited the Czech Republic and other four countries, pompeio fabricated various lies to encourage the visiting countries to abandon Chinas 5g technology. Even going to the Middle East, where the situation is complex, he still keeps discrediting China and 5g enterprises.

Although some countries are cautious under the threat of the United States, more countries have made objective and rational choices. For example, the European Unions high representative for foreign and security policy, Boris, said that although the EU is under pressure from big powers to choose a border station, it will not choose to unite with the United States to resist China for its own interests and values. In response to pressure from the United States, Suriname president Jean bertelser said, we will not talk about this topic (making a choice between China and the United States). On the 5g issue, Czech Prime Minister babesh responded that the Czech Republic is a sovereign state and has not seen any substantial security threat to the Czech Republic. Austrian foreign minister shallenberg said Austrias policy is not to prohibit or restrict a company, but to establish a reliable information system. Obviously, the vast majority of countries take the abacus of pompeios group as a matter of fact, and will not try to make a fuss for them at the expense of their own interests.

In addition to putting pressure on other countries to build so-called Anti China small circles, US politicians have also coerced other countries to follow their own example on other issues, including their allies. For example, in order to further contain Russia, the United States, in total disregard of the interests of its ally Germany, brandishes sanctions sticks to try to block the beixi-2 cooperation project between Russia and Germany. The US government also forced Japan and South Korea and other allies to pay more protection fees by withdrawing its troops. There are numerous such bad deeds of exploiting allies for their own personal gain. No wonder former president of the European Council, tusk, laments that with friends like the United States, who needs enemies?

On the suppression of Iran, Venezuela and other countries, American politicians have interpreted coercion diplomacy and power politics to the extreme. Although the United States has already withdrawn from Irans nuclear agreement, it has arbitrarily asked the UN Security Council to extend its arms embargo on Iran. After being rejected by a high number of votes, the US side unilaterally launched the rapid recovery of sanctions mechanism against Iran, openly standing opposite to the world. In order to encircle Venezuela, pompehaut paid a visit to Venezuelas four neighboring countries, soliciting and intimidating these countries to put pressure on Venezuela. Under the impact of novel coronavirus pneumonia, US politicians ignored the international communitys request to lift the strong voice of sanctions against Iran, Cuba and Venezuela. The anti code of their own actions constantly increased sanctions and made humanitarian crises, which is just an accomplice of the virus.

In dealing with international organizations, the United States is also engaged in threats and blackmail. After the outbreak of the epidemic, the United States repeatedly threatened who to carry out structural adjustment, and threatened to withdraw from who and do not rule out the establishment of alternative agencies, and wantonly undermined international cooperation in the fight against the epidemic. As the International Criminal Court continues to investigate U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan, the United States announced sanctions against its officials, openly putting its own interests above international law. As many analysts have pointed out, American politicians pursuing coercive diplomacy have become the biggest destroyers of the international order and the rules of multilateralism.

In international affairs, American politicians tend to coerce other countries, which is not only derived from the genes of hegemonism and power politics, but also to transfer the responsibility for the failure of epidemic prevention and the need to promote election. However, they made a wrong calculation. Sovereign states, big or small, strong or weak, have equal status in international law, and no one is willing to accept coercion. The U.S. government tries every means to isolate China, and the final result can only be its own isolation. Recently, nearly 50 scholars from Harvard University and other U.S. universities issued a joint statement, pointing out that the US foreign policy nearly failed, causing instability, insecurity and human suffering. AFP reported that the United States has suffered from extreme pressure and encountered extreme isolation.

In fact, more and more countries see clearly that the differences or contradictions between China and the United States are absolutely not a dispute over power or status, nor a dispute over social system, but a question of upholding justice or spreading malice, upholding multilateralism or unilateralism, advocating win-win cooperation or zero sum game. It is believed that every country seeking independent diplomacy and upholding fairness and justice will make the choice that is most in line with its own interests. Those American politicians who are trying to intimidate the world and bully other countries will be abandoned by the world and end up with a tragic end of solitude.