The automakers are now in court with Qualcomm, Nokia and other telecom developers, who are fighting billions of dollars for using the latters wireless standard technology. Companies such as Qualcomm may not only receive 5g technology royalties from talking cars, but also benefit from wireless communication products under planning in agriculture, medicine, home appliances and other industries.
As a result, a lot of different types of companies have to find a way to do these deals, which has 10 times the problem we have with smartphones, said Joe sinio, President of Dolby Laboratories patent licensing division The division works with the audio, wireless, radio and automotive industries.
The value of standardized technology is a key issue in the smartphone war, which has pitted wireless technology developers such as Nokia, Qualcomm and Motorola mobility against new entrants into the mobile phone market, such as apple and Microsoft. In the past decade, the two sides have launched dozens of legal proceedings, with legal costs of hundreds of millions of dollars.
According to United Market Research, the new dispute is likely to be more profitable, as sales of equipment using 5g technology are expected to grow by more than 120 times from $5.5 billion this year to $668 billion in 2026. The technology promises to transform a range of products, from dishwashers that we program on our morning commute to driverless delivery trucks and sensors, and farmers can even monitor crops, livestock and equipment via smartphones.
In the past few weeks, the U.S. and European courts have dismissed accusations that telecommunications companies licensing policies violate antitrust laws and confirm their ability to restrict access to their basic wireless technologies by those who refuse to meet licensing requirements. In cases filed by the automotive industry in Europe and the United States, the rulings have helped telecom companies rather than the current wireless standards.
Car manufacturers usually leave the patent issues to their parts suppliers, who pay any necessary royalties and compensate them in litigation. Daimler, the Mercedes Benz maker, is annoyed by the way the telecoms industry handles licensing, saying patent owners should deal with suppliers like everyone else.
Daimler and Ford Motor Co., in a letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), warned that the court of Appeal ruling that ruled in Qualcomms case could encourage the abuse of market power obtained through the collaboration in standard setting, thereby destabilizing the standards ecosystem.
More and more industries are going to start adopting technologies that have to be standardized, which means solving these problems will become more important, said Katie Coltart, a patent lawyer at Kirkland & Ellis in London
There are several companies that have invested billions of dollars in research, said Mark Snyder, deputy general counsel for Qualcomm. In a functioning market, you want people to negotiate seriously. Frand is a two-way street. u201cu3002
Despite the struggle between avanci and Daimler, the Dolby labs sinor said the patent pool allowed the company to obtain a large number of patents needed to comply with wireless standards. He said they could be a haven to limit the number of negotiations needed and free disputes from trade wars between countries. However, Craig Thompson, general manager of unified consulting, who helps the company analyze its patent portfolio, says there may be thousands more patents that are not in the patent pool or bound by frand terms.
U.S. and European telecoms companies found their biggest supporter in the trump administration, Makan delahim, head of antitrust at the Department of justice. Drasim has written to the court on behalf of Ericsson and interdigital, claiming that the patent fee dispute is a contract or patent dispute, not an antitrust act.
The worry is that if there is not enough money for patent owners, they will not cooperate to develop a single system that can be used by anyone. Mr. uribeo, a lawyer in Seattle, said too much of the firms new technology would be used to raise the price. Both extremes are bad for consumers, he said (small)
Source of this article: Zhang Zutao, responsible editor of Netease science and Technology Report_ NT5054