ee the scene which is dreadful to one s mind! Bank female customer manager laundered money more than 64 million for the office officials father, amazing details exposed! The court did

category:Hot
 ee the scene which is dreadful to one s mind! Bank female customer manager laundered money more than 64 million for the office officials father, amazing details exposed! The court did


This Customer Manager Gao Mou Cong, born in 1989, collected and kept a large amount of money from the crime for him according to his father Gaos instructions for more than four years. The amount involved in the case reached more than 60 million yuan.

The account manager covered up and concealed more than 64.1 million criminal income for his father

However, Gao XiaoCong, knowing that Gao xiao1 was a state functionary and the huge amount of money was the criminal income of Gao No. 1, he still covered up and concealed more than 64.1 million yuan of the money obtained from the crime according to Gaos instructions.

Specifically, Gaos means of laundering money for his father include controlling the bank and securities accounts opened in the name of others to hide peoples eyes, and helping his father collect tens of millions of cash.

From July 2014 to December 2015, Gao XiaoCong opened bank accounts and securities accounts in the name of Zhao, a friend of Gao 1, and actually controlled them. After Gao Mou 1 repeatedly handed over more than 8.1 million yuan of cash to its custody, Gao purchased financial products in the name of Zhao, or deposited a large amount of cash into the above bank account through bank ATM, and then traded stocks in the name of Zhao, so as to cover up and conceal the money from Gaos crime.

In January 2017, according to Gaos instructions, Gao Yicong helped Gao collect 10 million yuan in cash by setting up mobile phone numbers in the name of others for special contact. Among them, 4 million yuan of cash was transferred to others according to Gaos instructions, and the remaining 6 million yuan was used to purchase vehicles and transfer them to relatives homes in other provinces to hide and hide the money from Gaos crime hide.

In October 2017, according to Gaos instructions, Gao helped Gao to collect RMB 30 million from the bank account of Beijing hongjiuyang Technology Co., Ltd., which is actually controlled by Gao and Gao xiao1, and then carried out stock trading in the name of the company to cover up and conceal the criminal proceeds of Gao 1.

Gaos father fell in 2018

On October 25, 2018, under the circumstances that the case handling organ had already mastered Gaos help in collecting more than 16 million yuan from Lanxun Xinrun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Lanxun company), Gao was taken to Fengtai District Supervision Committee of Beijing for investigation.

Although the specific name of his father Gao Mou 1 was not mentioned in the judgment document of Gaos case, clues can still be found according to the public information of Lanxun company suspected of bribing Gao Mou 1.

According to the second instance criminal judgment on bribery of Lanxun Xinrun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (2020) jingxingzhong No. 57 issued by Beijing Municipal High Court on July 9, 2020, the court found that from 2014 to September 2015, Lanxun company and its responsible personnel, Wang Mou, asked Gao xiao1, then Secretary of the Party committee and chairman of the Beijing Federation of supply and marketing cooperatives, to supply the company to Beijing The sales cooperation general office provides help for the sales of Shouming data center computer room building of Lanxun Tianzhu Internet Industrial Park project.

To this end, Wang and others, on behalf of Lanxun company, together with the defendant Xu, through Beijing Xianghe Qicai real estate brokerage Co., Ltd., which is actually controlled by Xu, successively gave Gao Mou 1 a total of more than 16 million yuan.

Testimony shows that in 2015, Gao let his daughter as a link, let Liang and Han handle telephone cards and bank cards in their own names, and opened securities accounts. In July 2015, Gaos daughter contacted her, and the two bank accounts received 3.8 million yuan and 4.2 million yuan respectively. Later, Gao Mou 1 instructed her daughter to use the money to purchase stocks.

In the first half of 2018, Gao xiao1 was faced with organizational investigation and checked the situation of the securities account, and asked her daughter to sell the shares in Liangs securities account by 11.8 million yuan.

Gao Shouliang, born in 1961, has been working in the grain system for many years since he worked as an ordinary worker in a grain depot in the western suburbs of Beijing, according to the China discipline inspection and supervision report. In 1993, at the age of 32, he took up the leading position at the deputy bureau level; in 2013, he became the Secretary of the Party committee and chairman of the Beijing Federation of supply and marketing cooperatives, with great power. That is, from that time on, Gao Shouliangs life began to deviate greatly from the right track.

Details of Gao Shouliang collecting 10 million cash through his daughter were also exposed in the above-mentioned report:

In the night, a full 10 million yuan of cash was handed over in this way, and the woman receiving the money was Gao Shouliangs daughter.

Gao was sentenced for four and a half years at the final trial

Back to this case, the court of first instance held that the defendant Gaos behavior constituted the crime of concealing and concealing the crime. If the circumstances are serious, they should be punished according to law. In view of Gaos ability to truthfully confess his crime after he arrived at the case, he took the initiative to account for most of the criminal facts not mastered by the case handling organs, confessed his guilt and actively returned the stolen goods. He could be given a lighter punishment according to law.

Therefore, the court of First Instance sentenced Gao to four years and six months imprisonment and a fine of 400000 yuan.

After the first instance, Gao refused to accept the verdict and filed an appeal.

Gao and his defenders pointed out that Gao had confessed to a crime and confessed to punishment, confessed most of the criminal facts that the case handling organs did not have, and actively returned the stolen goods. The sentence of the first instance was too heavy for him, and he hoped that the court of second instance would reduce the punishment and apply probation to him.

In this regard, the Beijing Municipal High Court has found out that the cases such as confession and punishment, truthful confession of most of the criminal facts not mastered by the case handling organs, and the positive return of stolen goods have been confirmed by the first instance judgment, and the court of first instance has given him a lighter punishment according to the facts of Gaos crime, the nature of the crime, the circumstances of the crime and the degree of harm to society. During the second trial, Gao did not have any new circumstances of lighter punishment or statutory circumstances of mitigating punishment, which did not meet the legal requirements of probation.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true });})(); Another defender proposed that Gao had a quasi voluntary surrender plot. The Beijing higher court found out that Gao did not have an automatic surrender plot according to the case history and situation description issued by the supervision committee of Fengtai District, Beijing. Before he came to the case, the case handling organ had mastered the basic fact that he covered up and concealed more than 16 million yuan of criminal income, and other things he voluntarily confessed after he arrived at the case According to the criminal law and relevant judicial interpretation, Gaos confession and quasi surrender are not constituted. Finally, the Beijing Municipal High Court of the court of second instance held that Gaos reasons for appeal and the defense opinions of his defenders had no factual and legal basis and were not adopted. Gaos appeal was rejected and the original judgment was upheld. (part of the content is integrated from China discipline inspection and supervision newspaper, etc.) source: China Foundation news editor in charge: Liu Xiaowu_ NN4113

Another defender proposed that Gao had a quasi voluntary surrender plot. The Beijing higher court found out that Gao did not have an automatic surrender plot according to the case history and situation description issued by the supervision committee of Fengtai District, Beijing. Before he came to the case, the case handling organ had mastered the basic fact that he covered up and concealed more than 16 million yuan of criminal income, and other things he voluntarily confessed after he arrived at the case According to the criminal law and relevant judicial interpretation, Gaos confession and quasi surrender are not constituted.

Finally, the Beijing Municipal High Court of the court of second instance held that Gaos reasons for appeal and the defense opinions of his defenders had no factual and legal basis and were not adopted. Gaos appeal was rejected and the original judgment was upheld.

(part of the contents are integrated from China discipline inspection and supervision report, etc.)