Us refusal to join WHO global vaccine action experts: like voluntary surrender, its a big gamble

category:Hot
 Us refusal to join WHO global vaccine action experts: like voluntary surrender, its a big gamble


Many professionals said that the US governments decision was a heavy blow to the covax project. The guardian pointed out that the United States refusal to participate in covax means that it will bet on domestic vaccine research and development with the operation warp speed program as the core, and indirectly encourage other countries to do the same, which may lead to countries starting to hoard vaccines and push the price of high-dose vaccines - contrary to the original intention of covax, the US government In the end, it may eat its own fruit.

On May 15, local time, U.S. President trump announced the warp speed plan at a press conference at the White House. According to the associated press

At the same time, the infighting of the White Houses new crown task force and the trump administrations submission to the spread of the new coronavirus completely dominated the White Houses new crown epidemic response policy, leading to the chaos of the continuous outbreak of the epidemic in the United States.

[what is the impact of not participating in covax

Experts: its like taking the initiative to withdraw from the insurance policy

The us first policy does not benefit the United States

The United States has adopted a strategy of acting alone, which is a huge gamble, Lawrence gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown University, told the Washington Post

Kendall Hoyt, an assistant professor at the gaizel School of medicine at Dartmouth University, also said that the US governments move was similar to choosing to withdraw from an insurance policy -- the United States could have sought bilateral agreements with pharmaceutical companies and participated in covax to increase the chances of obtaining the first batch of safe vaccines. From a simple risk management perspective, this [decision] is short-sighted, Hoyt said

Not only that, but it will also affect other countries. Experts say the original intention behind covax is to stop vaccine hoarding and allow the vaccine to be used first for high-risk groups in each country, a strategy that may lead to better health outcomes and lower costs. And Americas non participation makes this goal even more difficult to achieve.

The covax program. According to Reuters

The United States has said it will not participate in any form of multilateral efforts to obtain vaccines, which is a real blow, said Maun, CO director of the global health center at the Institute for international and development in Geneva She added, in this pandemic, the behaviour of countries to vaccinate will have a political impact beyond public health. It turns out to be a reliable partner, or, in the end, youll leave everything to yourself.

It is reported that some officials of the trump administration, including Secretary of the United States Department of health and human services (HHS) Azar and Deputy Secretary of state Stephen Bigan, were quite interested in exploring a role in covax, but were ultimately rejected..

A senior government official told the Washington Post that there is resistance within the federal government, and many people believe that the United States has enough candidate vaccines for the new coronavirus, which are undergoing advanced clinical trials, and can be developed independently..

However, who will win the global competition for safe vaccines will largely affect the trump administrations us first policy on this issue.

New crown vaccination. According to the associated press

Experts say that the worst case scenario is that all the current vaccine candidates in the United States are not feasible, which will put the United States into a hopeless situation with no choice, because it rejected the olive branch from covax.

First, the new vaccine is unlikely to provide complete protection for all, which means that some Americans will remain vulnerable to imported cases, especially after tourism and trade resume;

As for the US governments decision, some professionals warned against focusing on winning the game.. Given the complexity of the supply chain, vaccine R & D is bound to be a global strategy, whether countries are willing to cooperate or not.

[White Houses internal fight against epidemic disease

The White Houses response to the epidemic has aroused strong concerns

At a time when the trump administration announced its refusal to join the covax program, the number of new coronavirus infections in the United States has crossed the 6 million mark. At the same time, the White Houses infighting and yielding to the spread of the new coronavirus are dominating the White Houses epidemic response policy, causing strong concern in the US public opinion.

According to CNN news, the White House is taking a different approach to deal with the new coronavirus pandemic. Over the past few weeks, the internal struggle between medical advisers of the White Houses new coronavirus task force has caused disagreements within the White House. The consultants and members of the working group, such as fudge and berkes, have taken a forward-looking position from top to bottom in response to the epidemic.

However, since the U.S. presidential election has entered the white hot stage in 2020, the current president Trumps focus is on re opening the economy, reducing the impact of the virus within a limited scope, or simply making hospitals not completely overcrowded. With the permission of the new epidemic consultant, Dr. Scott atlas, they did.

Trump and Scott atlas. According to ABC News

According to US media reports, Atlas is a neuroradiologist at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, specializing in free-market health care and economic policy, not epidemiology. He often made public remarks against fouch, and CNN news commentary said that atlas attracted Trumps attention by his appearance on Fox News.

Atlas entered the White House in early August this year, and now his influence in the White House has surpassed Dr. forge and other members of the task force on public awareness and trust. He talks to trump almost every day instead of briefing medical experts such as Deborah berkes, the working group coordinator, according to people familiar with the matter. The White Houses new coronavirus task force also has fewer and fewer meetings, ostensibly because its head, Mr. burns, needs to be out and running regularly..

According to US media reports, Atlas fully supports Trumps efforts to restart the economy and improve treatment. Atlas believes there is no need for extensive community testing, and the government should focus all its energy on protecting and testing the elderly population, while pushing the rest of the economy back to normal, according to people familiar with the situation. This is consistent with atlass statement that there is no need to test healthy people for new coronavirus during a visit to Florida on August 31.

A White House official told CNN that the views triggered a number of clashes between atlas and medical expert Burke. Last month, for example, the two argued at a working group meeting about revising the CDC guidelines for testing asymptomatic people.

The US media pointed out that Atlas (left) had many conflicts with medical expert Burke. According to the associated press

The Global Times quoted us media analysis as pointing out that trump invited atlas to participate in the epidemic working group because he wanted to use him as a gunner and oppose fudge and berkes. People familiar with the matter also told CNN news that when atlas boarded the plane to Washington, trump had no illusions about berkes, since berkes praised Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the house of Representatives, in an interview, trump began to doubt her..

Two White House officials worried that trumpti was carrying atlas only to weaken the voice of medical experts he disagreed with. Both fudge and berkes have criticized Trumps response to the epidemic, and they also put forward policy suggestions that trump considers too severe, including compulsory wearing of masks and blockade of virus infected areas.

CNN points out that after months of new crown pandemics and trumps fickleness, atlass arrival further complicates the efforts of fudge and berkes to advocate a science-based response within the White House.

Today, the White Houses response to the new epidemic appears to be increasingly influenced by Atlas, but in fact, the latters view is nothing new within the White House - before atlas joined the federal government, the White House had firmly focused on reopening the economy and protecting the vulnerable, while encouraging young people and healthy people to continue their efforts. Life . White House chief of staff meadows and vice presidents chief of staff mark short have also stressed the economic first approach to deal with the new coronavirus.

[specific influence of the presidential campaign

FDA is unconventionally considering early approval of vaccine

Most of Trumps political advisers believe that the negative views of Americans on how to deal with the new epidemic are almost impossible to reverse, and they hope that in the next two months, social unrest and other issues will cover up the adverse effects of epidemic control.

Now, novel coronavirus pneumonia is less and less popular in public in Trumps public opinion. When he openly discusses the new crown virus, he will emphasize false information and the conspiracy theory of death. At the same time, trump has almost given up the search for ways to further slow down the spread of the epidemic and has instead turned to vaccines that can change the political landscape, although health experts say it is unrealistic to get a safe and effective vaccine by November.

The new crown candidate vaccine of Novavax pharmaceutical company, USA. According to the Wall Street Journal

According to CNN news, on Monday, head of the food and Drug Administration told the financial times that he might consider approving a new crown vaccine before the end of phase III clinical trials. CNN reported that the statement means that the FDA, which has long positioned itself as a non political arbiter of science and data, has also been involved in political turmoil. Medical experts worry that if the American people think that the development of the vaccine was completed in a hurry, the final vaccine on the market will be doubted.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }In such a worrisome context, the US government has now announced its refusal to join a global vaccine program, cutting off a way back. According to the Washington Post, in May this year, the trump administration announced that it would withdraw from who and reduce funding to the organization, which was not only condemned by global health experts, but also criticized by members of both parties, medical associations and advocacy organizations in the United States. Biden, the Democratic presidential candidate, even vowed that if elected, his first day would change this A decision. Compared with the hasty withdrawal from who, the US governments decision this time is more desperate. Stephen Morrison, director of the center for global health policy at the U.S. Center for strategic and international studies, said the White House could still change its strategy to join covax, or at least get the Senate to fund the program through GAVI, an alternative. (but) it just shows how embarrassing, contradictory and self defeating it is. For the United States, ending its relationship with who during the outbreak has created an inexhaustible risk of self inflicted consequences. Source: editor in charge of Red Star News: Qin bailing_ NB17208

In such a worrying context, now, the U.S. government announced that it refused to join a global vaccine program, cutting off a way back.. According to the Washington Post, in May this year, the trump administration announced that it would withdraw from who and reduce funding to the organization, which was not only condemned by global health experts, but also criticized by members of both parties, medical associations and advocacy organizations in the United States. Biden, the Democratic presidential candidate, even vowed that if elected, his first day would change this A decision. Compared with the hasty withdrawal from who, the US governments decision this time is more desperate.