I found it fishy when I video with my wife, and my husband rushed home to find that he was really green

category:Hot
 I found it fishy when I video with my wife, and my husband rushed home to find that he was really green


Once, when I wanted to video with her, I found that her eyes were dodging and she was always switching to voice calls. I felt something was wrong. Zhang said that his wifes reaction made him aware of the abnormality, so he rushed back home from other places the next day and found the problem as expected: not only was there cigarette butts in the living room, but also many traces of his wife dating others were found in the bedroom.

At that time, Zhang was very angry and strongly asked for a divorce. Later, under the persuasion of both parents, they chose to make up. Although he forgives his wife, he has been wearing a green hat this matter has always been a thorn in Zhangs throat, so he bought a baseball bat and dagger online, ready to revenge his wifes lover Liu.

Later, Liu contacted my wife on some social software, and I pretended to be her. Zhang said that when Liu proposed to come to his home to take a bath, he agreed in the name of his wife and asked Liu downstairs. He was holding a prepared dagger and baseball bat, ambush downstairs, will be followed by Liu a number of injuries, constitute a minor injury level 2.

According to the prosecutor, the case in the review and approval of arrest stage, prosecutors review the case is a minor injury case caused by family conflicts and emotional disputes, and the suspect in this case is also a victim of marriage.

In order to ease the family conflicts and repair the relationship between the two sides, the prosecutor carried out interpretation and reasoning work for Zhangs behavior, and took the initiative to listen to the opinions of the victims in the hospital, and made a decision not to approve the arrest.

Related recommendations:

New wife conceals AIDS, premarital examination did not find out! The husband complained to the court but was rejected

Marriage is a happy thing

But for the hero in this case

Its a near collapse

When the man married his new wife, he paid a huge amount of betrothal gifts, jewelry and so on according to the rural custom, spent all his savings and held a grand wedding.

More than two months later, his wife caesarean section gave birth to the crystallization of two people, just when the familys feelings continue to heat up, the man unintentionally a move, let him see silly eyes

Originally, the man looked through his wifes medical record and found that it clearly recorded his wifes HIV infection! That is, people often say AIDS! Under the mans questioning, the woman reluctantly reveals her secret for many years: she knew that she was ill before her marriage

This news is a blow to the man who has spent all his savings for his marriage.

His reason is: suffering from AIDS is a disease that shouldnt be married, but the premarital examination agency has not found and stopped in time, and there is a major fault. At the same time, it infringes on the right to know as a spouse, resulting in a huge amount of gift money for marriage, asking the premarital examination agency to compensate for the loss.

So, is aids a disease prohibited by law?

According to the regulations on prevention and control of AIDS, the legitimate rights and interests of people living with HIV, AIDS patients and their families, such as marriage and employment, are protected by law. The marriage law of the peoples Republic of China forbids marriage for those who have diseases that are medically considered not to be married, but it does not explicitly stipulate that AIDS is a disease that is prohibited from marriage. Maternal and child health care law stipulates that AIDS is a designated infectious disease. After premarital medical examination, if a person is suffering from a designated infectious disease during the period of infection, the doctor shall give medical advice, and the man and woman who are going to get married shall postpone the marriage. In other words, people living with HIV and AIDS are not prohibited from marriage, but postponed.

In response to this case

Netizens questioned one after another

01

02

Some netizens think that premarital examination institutions are more responsible. If they dont even talk about such a serious disease, why should they have premarital examination?

03

Some netizens think that men should have the right to know, which is more important than life and privacy?

Is the judgment correct? Should premarital examination institutions be held responsible? How should the man protect his rights?

In this regard, lawyer Li Xiaofei of Guangdong Wumei law firm gave an answer

Is the judgment correct?

Should premarital examination institutions be held responsible?

Lawyer Li: the premise of requiring the premarital examination institutions to bear the tort liability is that the premarital examination institutions have tort acts, and there is a causal relationship between the infringement and the damage results.

Premarital examination institutions did not detect AIDS, there is indeed a fault.

However, it is the woman who establishes the service relationship with the premarital examination institution, so it is also the womans responsibility to pursue the responsibility of the premarital examination institution if it is necessary to pursue the responsibility. According to the regulations on prevention and control of AIDS, the staff of medical and health institutions should inform themselves of the fact that they are infected or sick. That is to say, if the premarital examination agency finds out the condition, it should inform the woman, not the man. Therefore, there is no causal relationship between the fault and damage results of premarital examination institutions.

How can the man protect his rights?

Lawyer Li: the man can protect his rights, but his object is his wife. If he believes that the womans concealment of AIDS has led to the breakdown of their marriage, he can claim a divorce. At the same time, according to the provisions of the civil code to be implemented next year, if the man is not at fault, he can also claim damages from the woman at the same time of divorce.

Civil Code tells you not to conceal your heart, implicate your lover and destroy your life!

If one party is suffering from a serious disease, it shall inform the other party truthfully before marriage registration; if not, the other party may request the peoples court to cancel the marriage. If the marriage is invalid or revoked, the party without fault has the right to claim damages.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }If an AIDS patient conceals his / her HIV / AIDS history and marries another person, the marriage shall be regarded as invalid in law. If the spouse of AIDS patient wants to divorce AIDS patient after knowing the truth, the court should declare the marriage invalid, and the AIDS patient should bear the necessary civil compensation liability. AIDS patients who marry others maliciously and cause serious harm to the health of others should be punished according to the criminal law. In this case, the mans betrothal loss is caused by the fault of the woman, and the mental damage is mainly due to the concealment and deception of the woman. Therefore, the final court rejected the mans request, saying that the results of premarital examination had no direct connection with subsequent losses, and the courts judgment was correct. In October 2003, the compulsory premarital examination, which had been implemented for 17 years, was cancelled, and the premarital examination was changed from a compulsory item to a optional item before marriage. However, without compulsory requirements, fewer and fewer people voluntarily do premarital examination. Source: Modern Express editor: Hua Chengyu_ NBJ11143

In this case, the mans betrothal loss is caused by the fault of the woman, and the mental damage is mainly due to the concealment and deception of the woman. Therefore, the final court rejected the mans request, saying that the results of premarital examination had no direct connection with subsequent losses, and the courts judgment was correct.