I picked up a box in the corridor to sell waste products. I didnt expect to get a lawsuit and paid more than 10000 yuan

category:Hot
 I picked up a box in the corridor to sell waste products. I didnt expect to get a lawsuit and paid more than 10000 yuan


Uncle Zhang, who lives in Xicheng District, usually takes his granddaughter to school for his daughter. In his spare time, he picks up some waste products in the building and sells them. One day in November last year, Mr. Zhang picked up a paper box from the corridor in front of door 2001 on the 20th floor of the building. Soon, he was summoned to the police station for investigation.

Originally, 2001 is a beauty company. The paper box that Mr. Zhang picked up was sent by express on the same day, and the cosmetics purchased by the company were purchased. The cosmetics company called the police when they found the paper box missing. Police through the transfer of the building monitoring, lock Zhang uncle. Mr. Zhang argued that he thought the paper box was a waste product that no one wanted, so he threw away the contents and sold the cardboard box as waste. Due to insufficient evidence, the police did not consider it a crime and did not file a criminal case against Uncle Zhang.

Subsequently, the beauty company sued Uncle Zhang to Xicheng court, demanding that he compensate for the economic loss of his lost goods of 17837.5 yuan.

The beauty company submitted the delivery order, purchase invoice and e-bank transfer receipt of the consignor to the court to prove the quantity and amount of cosmetics purchased and lost. Although Mr. Zhang disagreed with the evidence and thought that the quantity and price of cosmetics claimed by the beauty company were inconsistent with the actual situation, he did not provide effective evidence to prove his opinion.

In addition, Mr. Zhang also said that the beauty company opened and checked the express box and placed it in the public area of the corridor for several hours, which made him mistakenly think that the carton was waste. In addition, he was too old to understand cosmetics, so that the articles in the paper box were discarded. The beauty company should also bear certain responsibility for this.

After hearing, Xicheng court held that the relevant evidence submitted by the beauty company has formed a complete chain of evidence, which is enough to prove the actual value of the companys purchase of goods. However, Mr. Zhang did not provide sufficient evidence to refute it. Therefore, Mr. Zhang should compensate the beauty company for the loss of goods of 17837.5 yuan.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }At the same time, the court held that the beauty company did not fulfill the duty of caution against the valuable goods by placing it in the public corridor at the door for several hours after signing for the express delivery with valuable goods. Therefore, the beauty company also has some faults for its own losses, which can reduce uncle Zhangs liability for compensation. In view of the fact that the public corridor where the goods are placed belongs to the relatively closed space in the residential building, and Uncle Zhang disposes of the non affiliated articles in the relatively closed space without authorization, so Mr. Zhang should bear greater responsibility. Finally, the court decided that Uncle Zhang should bear 60% of the compensation liability and compensate the beauty company for the loss of 10702.5 yuan. After the judgment of the first instance was pronounced, both parties said in court that they would not appeal after serving the judgment, and the performance was completed in court. Source: Beijing daily client editor: Li Tianyi_ NN7528

The judge read the verdict

Finally, the court decided that Uncle Zhang should bear 60% of the compensation liability and compensate the beauty company for the loss of 10702.5 yuan. After the judgment of the first instance was pronounced, both parties said in court that they would not appeal after serving the judgment, and the performance was completed in court.