Beijing media: it is difficult to collect evidence in the case of Deng ba ba.

category:Sports click:470
 Beijing media: it is difficult to collect evidence in the case of Deng ba ba.


Public opinion momentum booster investigation procedure started

In August 4th, Yatai home and Shenhua seventy-sixth minutes, Shenhua foreign aid Demba in the absence of control of the ball in the case of the Yatai player Tan Tiancheng fouls, causing the latter to fall. As a result, the tension between Yatai players and the two players had a quarrel. The camera captures the image of Deng Ba Bas indignant grasp of the tension collar and the pursuit of the latter. After the game, the claim that tension was attacked by racist language was spread, and Shenhua manager Wu Jingui confirmed at a post match press conference that Yatai players irritated the country in an insulting language.

In the past two days, the incident continued to ferment in the public opinion circle. Despite the fact that the facts have not yet been identified, the denunciation of racial discrimination has intensified. The Chinese Football Association also closely followed developments. Yesterday, it announced the launching of a probe into the conflict between two players. The Beijing Youth Daily reporter learned yesterday from Shenhua and Yatai club that the tension will come to Beijing this afternoon to attend the disciplinary hearing organized by the China Football Association Discipline Committee.

The referees report is the decisive factor

After the game, he stressed more than once through the social platform that he was attacked by the language of racial discrimination. However, the Yatai club did not agree with each others club and tenbaba. Yesterday afternoon, a senior member of the Yatai Club told the North Youth newspaper: first of all, the fact that the tension to apology did not exist by the club; secondly, no matter what the public opinion made or what the outside world did No one (except two parties) has so far proved or heard tension using racist language to attack each other. The Yatai also mentioned the relevant contents of the Chinese Football Association announcement. The Football Association said, the Football Association said it started the investigation program according to the report of the competition supervision, but the game was supervised at the stand. Can he see or listen to what the players say? We do not want to hype this matter, but the handling of this matter is bound to be evidence.

It is worth noting that the report issued by the Chinese Football Association in yesterdays announcement did not mention the report of the referee, but compared to the supervision of the competition, Huang Yejun was a closer witness to the location and the parties. In dealing with the disciplinary violations in the match field, the Chinese Football Association often takes the referees report as an important basis for judging cases. Although the football association has not yet confirmed whether the yups report has recorded two players conflict, one of the details that can not be ignored is that Huang Yejun showed a yellow card to the man at the time, but not the tension. This shows that the referees action on tension was not considered a violation of discipline. If the competition supervision can determine whether the players will shake hands after the game, then the speech conflict of the two players should be determined by the referee. In this sense, Huang Yejuns report will be the most crucial element in the handling of this case.

It is difficult to obtain evidence for punishments

The fifty-fourth article of the new edition of the Chinese football association rules is also the first second paragraph of the penalty rule. The non sports moral behavior (accusation, abuse, etc.) of the opponent or other person at least suspend or prohibit the entry of 3 games, and a fine of at least 21 thousand yuan. Strictly speaking, when abuse occurs in professional leagues is confirmed, the abuser will face the above penalties. But when we say this, we have to mention the problem of obtaining evidence. Unlike the post - match press conferences that have been recorded in the event, all kinds of actions in the game, including the violation of discipline, often occur between the electrooptic flint, and the referee needs a lot of attention in the game. They tend to pay more attention to the game as the ball moves, and are limited by energy. Some details on the field are hard to avoid. It is not uncommon for football players to be rude. In fact, not all players who swear on the field will be punished. Once there is no real evidence to prove that the burst of rough mouth exists objectively, it is very difficult to make corresponding punishment.

With the rapid internationalization of Chinas vocational League, more and more foreign aid, foreign teachers and even management and medical logistics service personnel have entered the domestic league at all levels. The Chinese Football Association also needs to refine its behavior in the field and outside the field. For instance, the difficulty of dealing with foreign practitioners is relatively high in the recognition of inappropriate speech. Most domestic players English level may be limited to a few words, but if the word is not respectful or provocative to the opponent in a specific condition, the word can be identified as, an English expert with a rich foreign affairs experience told reporters yesterday. Improper speech. Of course, there is proof that he did say so. The referee can sometimes hear foreign aid or foreign teachers chatter, but not necessarily understand the meaning, so forensics has always been a problem. The source of this article: Beiqing net: Beijing Youth Daily Author: Xiao Fei, editor in chief: Xu Zexin _BJS4919

With the rapid internationalization of Chinas vocational League, more and more foreign aid, foreign teachers and even management and medical logistics service personnel have entered the domestic league at all levels. The Chinese Football Association also needs to refine its behavior in the field and outside the field. For instance, the difficulty of dealing with foreign practitioners is relatively high in the recognition of inappropriate speech. Most domestic players English level may be limited to a few words, but if the word is not respectful or provocative to the opponent in a specific condition, the word can be identified as, an English expert with a rich foreign affairs experience told reporters yesterday. Improper speech. Of course, there is proof that he did say so. The referee can sometimes hear foreign aid or foreign teachers chatter, but not necessarily understand the meaning, so forensics has always been a problem.