Huang Zhifeng said that he did not support the idea of Hong Kong Independence, which was in line with one country, two systems

category:Global
 Huang Zhifeng said that he did not support the idea of Hong Kong Independence, which was in line with one country, two systems


Huang Zhifeng (Hong Kong media)

Haiwai.com, July 27 (Xinhua) the general election of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region will be held in September. Cai Minjun, the Electoral Officer of Kowloon East, sent a letter to Huang Zhifeng, who had submitted his nomination. The letter contained seven questions asking Huang Zhifeng to respond to his past words and deeds. Huang Zhifeng posted a response on social media on the 27th, saying that he did not support Hong Kong Independence and self-determination in order to enter the gate; he repeatedly contacted with foreign politicians and begged for foreign sanctions against Hong Kong, but he even claimed that he never used foreign forces to conduct political activities in the local area in an attempt to shirk his responsibility. In addition, he openly opposed the Hong Kong national security law. Some Hong Kong netizens commented that people without shame are invincible..

The letter from the returning officer to Huang Zhifeng covers four major areas: whether to request foreign sanctions against the Hong Kong SAR to harm Hong Kongs interests; whether to oppose the Hong Kong national security law; whether to support Hong Kong Independence; and whether to veto all government bills and budget proposals in order to force the SAR government to comply with the so-called demands.

In order to enter the gate, Huang Zhifeng argued that he had withdrawn from the Hong Kong consensus of the Hong Kong Independence organization. He did not advocate self-determination or Hong Kong Independence. He also claimed that his ideas were in line with the principle of one country, two systems. In addition, he openly declared his opposition to the Hong Kong national security law.

In the letter, the Returning Officer mentioned that Huang Zhifeng had asked the US Congress to pass the Hong Kong Bill of human rights and democracy, which included sanctions against the Hong Kong SAR and measures detrimental to the interests of the HKSAR; in March 2020, Huang Zhifeng and some people had jointly launched an open letter to the US Secretary of state asking the US government to impose sanctions on Hong Kong officials; and on March 27, 2020, Huang Zhifeng asked the US government to impose sanctions on Hong Kong officials In the Washington Post, Zhifeng urged the US side to include specific sanctions in the report on the Hong Kong Bill of human rights and democracy; Huang Zhifeng repeatedly marked international front and similar terms in his Facebook post related to his words and deeds. The returning officer questioned whether Huang Zhifeng still intends to continue to request US sanctions against the Hong Kong SAR? Do you intend to ask foreign governments to promote similar laws?

In answering this question, Huang Zhifeng denied that he had no ability or intention to exert pressure on China or Hong Kong with the help of foreign forces, and he had never used foreign forces to engage in local political activities. He tried to shirk his responsibility and cover up the fact that he had repeatedly linked up with foreign politicians.

Whats more ridiculous is that he also claimed that his purpose of participating in the election of the Legislative Council was to take advantage of the status, authority and convenience of members of the Legislative Council to participate in areas related to international front, including promoting world peace.

In response to Huang Zhifengs article, some patriotic netizens in Hong Kong denounced if a man is shameless, he will be invincible, and others have asked the SAR government to cancel his DQ (candidacy). On the other hand, his statement also caused some brothers dissatisfaction, questioning why he said he supported one country, two systems, and accused him of putting personal seats more important than international front. It can be seen that Huang Zhifeng, in order to enter the gate, made himself not human on both sides.

Comments from Hong Kong netizens

After receiving a reply, the Returning Officer will judge whether the candidates election nomination is valid. The legal profession has said that if the candidates do not act in accordance with their sincere support for the basic law and their loyalty to the SAR, their nominations should be ruled invalid.

Ta Kung Pao published a comment on the 27th that in order to enter the gate of the Legislative Council and realize the plan of soliciting speculation, politicians who solicited speculation did not hesitate to beat me of yesterday with the same person of today, pretending that they did not support Hong Kong Independence and had no intention of asking the United States to implement sanctions against Hong Kong. However, this kind of trivial skill can not deceive the public, nor can it deceive the district administrative officers who are in charge of checking the candidates for the election. They should be DQ when they are due. They must not be soft hearted and cause carbuncle problems. According to the article, those who engage in speculation know that they cant avoid it. They disguise themselves and tell lies with their eyes open. There is no bottom line. However, just like the three changes of Bai Gu Jing, the purpose is to eat the meat of Tang monks, and the opposition to factionalism is inseparable from its sect. It is a vain attempt to 35 + seize power in the Legislative Council, and then use the Legislative Council as a platform for speculation. Firmly holding the gate of the election is the first step to smash the scheme of soliciting speculation and avoid Hong Kong falling into the abyss of disaster.

Liang Zhenying, vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese peoples Political Consultative Conference and former chief executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, also made a satire. After reading the response of many opposition parties to the Chief Electoral Officers inquiry, he had only one feeling: shame.. The belief of a political man is life. You cant talk about people or ghosts. These peoples lengthy explanations only seek to enter the gate and ignore the feelings of the supporters. .

In response to Huang Zhifengs earlier claim that he was politically censored, Liang Zhenying said that what are the problems with political review of legislative council candidates on certain issues? Can those who promote foreign sanctions against Hong Kong and support secession become members of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the peoples Republic of China? Without such political censorship, Hong Kong will become a national and international joke. We need to be right.

Ma En Kwok, chairman of the Hong Kong law Exchange Foundation and barrister, said bluntly that none of the parties concerned sincerely supported the basic law and pledged allegiance to the Hong Kong SAR. Liu Zhaojia, vice president of the National Association for Hong Kong and Macao Studies, said that Hong Kongs national security law has been implemented. In the previous District Council elections, the qualification examination of candidates was relatively loose, but the pan peoples primary election turned out to be radical. China will not allow domestic and foreign hostile forces to use the Legislative Councils intention to paralyze the Hong Kong government and seize the power of governance. Therefore, the central and Hong Kong governments have taken a very tough stance this time. Liu Zhaojia said frankly that the scale of DQ this time will be much larger than in the past.

Prior news:

Huang Zhifeng posted satire after being questioned by Hong Kongs Returning Officer seven questions

The general election of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region will be held in September. The nomination period begins on July 18 and ends on July 31. The Returning Officer of Kowloon East, Mr. Cai Minjun, sent a letter to Huang Zhifeng, who had submitted his nomination. The letter contained seven questions and 10 attachments, asking Huang to respond to his past words and deeds and reply by 11:00 on the 27th. Huang Zhifeng received the letter the same day, and made a small move.

According to the Hong Kong news network, the returning officer pointed out seven questions in his letter and asked Huang Zhifeng to explain his words and deeds

First, Huang Zhifeng served as the Secretary General of the Hong Kong aspirations of the Hong Kong Independence organization for a long time. Does he still intend to continue to promote the idea of public will, including democratic self-determination, that is, the future process of self-determination with Hong Kong Independence as one of the options?

Second, if Huang Zhifeng still intends to continue to promote the idea of democratic self-determination, how can such behavior meet the substantive requirements of his declaration in the nomination form that he upholds the basic law and guarantees loyalty to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?

Third question: the returning officer said that he had noticed Huang Zhifengs words and deeds, and asked whether Huang Zhifeng still intended to continue to ask the United States for sanctions against the Hong Kong SAR? Do you intend to ask foreign governments to promote similar laws?

Fourth, the purpose of Huang Zhifengs participation in the election of the Legislative Council includes taking advantage of the identity, authority and convenience of members of the Legislative Council to continue to push him to exert pressure on the central government or the SAR with the help of foreign forces?

Fifthly, in view of Huang Zhifengs words and deeds about requesting foreign countries to impose sanctions on officials of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, how does such behavior meet the substantive requirements of making a declaration in the nomination form that upholds the basic law and guarantees allegiance to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?

Sixth question: Huang Zhifeng claimed earlier that he resolutely opposes the national security law and asks him to answer whether he opposes the Hong Kong National Security Law and the performance of the constitutional responsibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to safeguard national security?

Question 7: asked Huang Zhifeng to respond, will he, together with some members, veto all bills, motions and budget proposals submitted by the SAR government to the Legislative Council?

After receiving a reply, the Returning Officer will judge whether the candidates election nomination is valid. The legal profession has said that if the candidates do not act in accordance with their sincere support for the basic law and their loyalty to the SAR, their nominations should be ruled invalid.

Huang Zhifeng posted these seven problems on his personal social media on the 26th, but made a lot of small moves. He put a picture of the returning officer in the post and exclaimed, I dont know how much political pressure Ms. CAI (the Returning Officer) is under, and whether she needs to stay in a safe house for working overtime on weekends.. Some Hong Kong netizens questioned that Huang Zhifeng was inciting hands and feet against the returning officer. Some netizens posted pictures to satirize Huang Zhifengs ugly behavior of using the opportunity to make trouble at the candidate briefing meeting before he was ruled invalid in the district election nomination last year.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }Huang Zhifeng: do you want to explain whether you want to promote Hong Kong Independence by calling on HSBC to inquire about the origin of the 5-digit remittance of Huang Zhifeng. The latter: This is a political blow. Source: overseas website Author: Yang Jia, editor in charge: Hu Shuli_ MN7479