Male city village stolen notebooks do not recognize the court zero confession sentenced him for 9 months.

category:Society click:318
 Male city village stolen notebooks do not recognize the court zero confession sentenced him for 9 months.


Case: stealing the computer, there is no word in the trial

In July 4, 2018, the Chancheng court heard the case publicly.

During the trial, according to the audio-visual information provided by the prosecution, it was confirmed that Chen unlocked the door at the stolen place and left with the goods in his arms. The victim, Ma, also said that in January 6, 2018, it lost a laptop in the rental house, and one of the East beams of the rental house, after learning that the tenant lost a laptop computer, identified the man who was locked into the house by the video video installed in the rental house.

According to the above-mentioned relevant evidence, the prosecution believes that Chen Mou should be investigated for criminal responsibility for theft when he steals other peoples property for the purpose of illegal possession.

The defendant, Chen, remained silent during the trial, without any excuse.

Verdict: Chen was sentenced to 9 months and a fine of 1000 yuan

The court in Zen City found that Chen took illegal possession as the purpose and took secret measures to steal other peoples property. His behavior has constituted theft. The facts and charges of the prosecution were set up. Although Chen remained silent after the case was returned to the court, the public prosecution service provided evidence of surveillance video, victim statements and witness testimony, which were sufficient to confirm the fact that Chen was burglary.

The court of Chancheng held that the public prosecutor accused Chen of carrying out the theft facts clearly, and the evidence was conclusive. Finally, the court decided that defendant Chen was guilty of theft and was sentenced to 9 months imprisonment and a fine of 1000 yuan.

The judge said: the evidence is true and the sentence can be sentenced. The case is a typical zero oral confession case. Despite the fact that the defendant did not confess the facts of the theft, he can still convict Chen when other evidence is fully confirmed. The judge in the Chancheng court said. In practice, some of the defendants, out of the motive of evading responsibility and so on, neglect the important facts of the crime and even deny them completely, so that zero confession cases appear. According to the relevant provisions of Chinas Criminal Procedure Law: If the defendant does not confess, the evidence is true and sufficient, the defendant can be found guilty and punished. Therefore, the judge admonished the defendant that he should not be lucky enough to confess the facts of the crime, and strive for a mitigated punishment. Source: Southern Metropolis Daily editor: Wang Zheng _NN7526

The judge said: the evidence is conclusive and sentencing, and the defendant should not take chances.

This case is a typical zero oral confession case, although the defendant Chen did not confess the facts of the theft, but in the case of other evidence which can fully confirm the crime, Chen can still be convicted and sentencing. The judge in the Chancheng court said.

In practice, some of the defendants, out of the motive of evading responsibility and so on, neglect the important facts of the crime and even deny them completely, so that zero confession cases appear. According to the relevant provisions of Chinas Criminal Procedure Law: If the defendant does not confess, the evidence is true and sufficient, the defendant can be found guilty and punished. Therefore, the judge admonished the defendant that he should not be lucky enough to confess the facts of the crime, and strive for a mitigated punishment.