15.95 million extra for the delivery fee of the riders delivery, which disappeared in less than an hour

category:Hot
 15.95 million extra for the delivery fee of the riders delivery, which disappeared in less than an hour


The Nanjing Public Relations Department staff responded that the problem was due to a system failure. At present, the platform has been undergoing rectification to avoid such problems. In response to Mr. Xies appeal, the staff said: we will contact the riders as soon as possible, and we will strengthen the training of riders in the future. When they encounter different orders, please contact us as soon as possible to make the rider work more smoothly.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }So, should the rider get this huge bonus? Qiu Lufeng, a professor at the Law School of Nanjing University, believes that such a huge amount of payment based on system errors is unjust enrichment in law. It is not the original intention of the platform to pay the rider, and the rider should return it. However, according to the relevant provisions of the property law and the contract law, the platform indicates the personal account, and even signs it as my wallet. The funds in the platform should belong to the rider. If there is no special agreement between the two parties, the platform will directly deduct the funds after the occurrence of such a situation, and the platform will deduct it without the prior consent of the rider, then the practice of the platform may constitute an infringement. Encountered a similar situation, hungry? How should the platform handle it correctly? Professor Qiu said that the platform can temporarily freeze the transfer or withdrawal of the funds, and then through legal channels, require riders to return the funds to the platform. In addition, the rider pays a certain labor cost when delivering meals, and he can ask the platform to pay the corresponding labor remuneration. Source: CCTV news client editor: Li Xi_ NN2587

So, should the rider get this huge bonus? Qiu Lufeng, a professor at the Law School of Nanjing University, believes that such a huge amount of payment based on system errors is unjust enrichment in law. It is not the original intention of the platform to pay the rider, and the rider should return it. However, according to the relevant provisions of the property law and the contract law, the platform indicates the personal account, and even signs it as my wallet. The funds in the platform should belong to the rider. If there is no special agreement between the two parties, the platform will directly deduct the funds after the occurrence of such a situation, and the platform will deduct it without the prior consent of the rider, then the practice of the platform may constitute an infringement.

Encountered a similar situation, hungry? How should the platform handle it correctly? Professor Qiu said that the platform can temporarily freeze the transfer or withdrawal of the funds, and then through legal channels, require riders to return the funds to the platform. In addition, the rider pays a certain labor cost when delivering meals, and he can ask the platform to pay the corresponding labor remuneration.