Can the US defense still visit China for a long time? Expert: there is a key problem

category:Global
 Can the US defense still visit China for a long time? Expert: there is a key problem


Recently, the U.S. Navys two aircraft carrier formations, Nimitz and Reagan, conducted two very rare dual carrier combat exercises in the South China Sea. Subsequently, the Reagan aircraft carrier carried out a joint military exercise of the three countries with Japanese and Australian ships in the east of the Philippines, while the Nimitz aircraft carrier formation crossed the Malacca Strait westward and held joint exercises with the Indian Navy in the Andaman Sea. Military observer Liang Yongchun believes that the United States is the biggest driver of the militarization of the South China Sea, which has been proved once again by the frequent military operations of the United States around the South China Sea.

There is no half inch territory of the United States in the South China Sea, but the United States aircraft carrier formation has been wandering in the South China Sea all the year round. Now, it frequently conducts double carrier exercises and multi-national joint exercises. What is the militarization of the South China Sea? These actions of the U.S. military are really pushing the South China Sea into militarization, so they should stop calling for capture.

Observation of Australian warships by Japanese Maritime Self Defense Forces

Liang Yongchun, a military observer, believes that the United States is accelerating its military cooperation with Japan, Australia and India from the perspective of the recent intensive military exercises conducted by the U.S. military with relevant countries. However, at present, the United States and India are still on guard against each other.

The United States has always been good at using the international league system to serve itself. In dealing with China in the South China Sea, the United States has to join Japan, Australia and India. Judging from the two joint military exercises launched at the same time this week, the exercises of the United States, Japan and Australia are combat courses. Among them, Australia also sent its flagship amphibious assault ship Canberra to participate in the exercise, showing great efforts. However, the relationship between the United States and India is relatively subtle. A US Navy spokesman said that the navies of the United States and India have conducted so-called high-end exercises including air defense exercises, while the Indian Navy only admits that they and the US Navy have conducted cross navigation exercises. The so-called cross navigation exercise means that the Indian army and the passing us navy have practiced such non combat subjects as formation navigation and communication and liaison. So you see, the news bulletins of the two sides of the same exercise have changed into different words. Obviously, the United States and India still have a bit of a strange dream.

The navies of the United States and India had to take turns in the east every year to carry out a joint exercise of Malabar. India used to have two principles: one is not to follow the US military to the South China Sea; the other is not to play with Australia. With the deepening of military relations between the United States and India, India will first compromise on the second issue. This years Malabar exercise is likely to show a picture of the United States, Japan, India and Australia in the same frame. As for the South China Sea issue, that is to say, whether the Indian Navy will follow the US Army into the South China Sea in the future, we need to continue to observe.

U.S. Defense Secretary esper continued to attack China on the South China Sea issue during his recent visit. Meanwhile, he hoped to visit China as defense secretary this year and said that the United States does not seek conflict with China. In this regard, military observer Liang Yongchun believes that the key to solving the problem is to change the attitude of the United States hostile to China.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }In fact, there is nothing new about the South China Sea in espers speech, but his other words have attracted the attention of all parties. He said that he hoped to visit China as defense minister within the year, and this information quickly made headlines in the international media. This shows that the international community now generally hopes that the military relations between China and the United States will be eased down, and there will be no tensions. At the same time, all parties generally believe that the key to solving the problem is to change the attitude of the United States hostile to China. There is another problem to be noted. China and the United States emphasize that there is no conflict. China emphasizes that non conflict is to resolve differences through equal dialogue with the United States. Americans usually speak of no conflict, and the subtext is subdue the soldiers without war. It is better not to fight. If I scare you, you can behave as I mean. If esper wants to force us to make concessions on the South China Sea sovereignty issue, he is daydreaming. Chinas desire for peace is sincere. We hope that esper is also sincere. We hope that the U.S. government can keep its word and how the Sino US military relations will develop. Now the ball is on the American side. Source of this article: CCTV military Author: Wang Bing, editor in charge: Dai Lili_ NN4994

In fact, there is nothing new about the South China Sea in espers speech, but his other words have aroused the attention of all parties. He said that he hoped to visit China as defense minister within the year. This information quickly made the headlines in the international media. This shows that the international community now generally hopes that the military relations between China and the United States will be eased down, and there will be no tensions. At the same time, all parties generally believe that the key to solving the problem is to change the attitude of the United States hostile to China.

There is another problem to be noted. China and the United States emphasize that there is no conflict. China emphasizes that non conflict is to resolve differences through equal dialogue with the United States. Americans usually speak of no conflict, and the subtext is subdue the soldiers without war. It is better not to fight. If I scare you, you can behave as I mean. If esper wants to force us to make concessions on the South China Sea sovereignty issue, he is daydreaming. Chinas desire for peace is sincere. We hope that esper is also sincere. We hope that the U.S. government can keep its word and how the Sino US military relations will develop. Now the ball is on the American side.