California urgently buys more than 400 million masks from Chinese Enterprises

 California urgently buys more than 400 million masks from Chinese Enterprises

Newson stressed the importance of masks at a news conference on the 22nd

At present, California consumes 46 million masks a month, but needs more, and domestic companies are still unable to meet such a huge demand, Newson said at a news conference. To this end, he announced that he would continue the previous personal protective equipment procurement strategy, which specifically mentioned BYD.

He mentioned the previous cooperation between California and BYD: there was a contract signed with BYD (a Chinese company) in the purchase of personal protective equipment. We made a bold commitment to purchase hundreds of millions of medical surgical masks and N95 masks from BYD. We will continue to maintain the continuous supply chain that we established in May and June, which can guarantee supply. Of the estimated 200 million surgical masks, 193 million have been delivered.

During the process, Newson also disclosed that BYD would have to refund half of the deposit to California, that is, 247.5 million US dollars (about 1.75 billion yuan) due to the failure of BYDs N95 masks to obtain federal certification before April 30. However, Newson also admitted that tens of millions of medical surgical masks have arrived in the United States, but failed to explain why N95 masks were not certified.

After two extensions pushed by the California government, BYD was finally certified on June 8. These new N95 masks, as well as the surgical masks previously supplied by BYD to California, play a crucial role in the states public safety and reopening strategy, Newson said in a statement at the time

And Newsons statement at the press conference on the 22nd also broke the previous doubts of BYD from the United States.

According to the data released by the California government, since the outbreak, the state has imported 864 million N95 masks and nearly 300 million medical masks. However, Newson admitted on the 22nd that the government had not reasonably provided these masks to suitable posts, I want to ensure (in the future) that these masks can be delivered to front-line staff.

As of the 22nd, the California government announced the use of masks

But Brian Ferguson, a spokesman for the Emergency Services Department of the governors office in California, did not provide details of the plans to provide the new masks. Meanwhile, Carmela Coyle, President of the California Hospital Association, criticized the confusion in the way California had provided masks to hospitals. Most of the time, hospitals can obtain masks only when the stock of personal protective equipment is very low and with the help of the Regional Coordinator.

Novel coronavirus pneumonia is the largest number of confirmed cases in California, which has surpassed New York in 22 days. As of the morning of the 22nd local time, California has reported about 1100 more confirmed cases than New York, according to Johns Hopkins University.

Newson revealed at noon that day that in the past 24 hours, there were 12807 new confirmed cases in California, the highest single day increase since the outbreak of the epidemic, and the cumulative number of confirmed cases also reached 413576, accounting for about one tenth of the total number of confirmed cases in the United States.

California is one of the first states to detect the epidemic in the United States, and it is also the first region to implement the home order in mid March. But with the gradual lifting of the ban on epidemic prevention in May, the number of confirmed cases, the number of hospitalized patients and the number of deaths in California have increased significantly. Washington Post pointed out that the outbreak of clustering infection in several California prisons is one of the reasons for the spread of the epidemic. Large scale rallies in parts of the state have also caused new infections. Although California issued a state wide mandatory mask order a month ago, at least five counties refused to implement it.

Source: editor in charge: Chen Hequn_ NB12679