Gree counterattack: Mideas fraud in China Mobile bidding project

category:Finance
 Gree counterattack: Mideas fraud in China Mobile bidding project


Gree said that Chongqing Mideas invoice information was inconsistent in the relevant information publicity of supplier information verification of high pressure water chiller centrifugal chiller products released by China Mobile on September 5, 2019.

Gree also said that Mideas technical parameters did not meet the bidding standards. When China Mobile invited the 2017-2018 centralized procurement project of high-pressure centrifugal chillers, according to the public information, the maximum cooling capacity of Chongqing Midea AHRI laboratory was 2200rt, which could not cover the bidding cooling capacity of 2500rt. As of February 26, 2020, the test bench certificate of Chongqing United States for 2017-2018 centralized procurement project of high pressure centrifugal chillers was not displayed on the AHRI official website. It was not until March 31, 2020 that the additional 3000rt test bench certificate of Chongqing United States was found.

Gree said that it has fed back to China Mobile on relevant issues for many times. Why can Chongqing Midea win the bid repeatedly or even win the bid only for many times when there are so many problems? It will submit it to China Mobile again in combination with other issues for fair treatment and fair treatment.

Earlier, China Mobile announced that Zhuhai Gree Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. had been disqualified due to fraud in China Mobiles bidding. In a statement issued in the early morning of July 4, Gree said that it was a material sorting error in the application process, and it was not an act of falsely marking technical parameters and energy efficiency parameters for the purpose of winning the bid. At the same time, he said that malicious slander on the Internet was committed by a certain peer enterprise in Guangdong Province, and it will reserve the right to investigate its legal responsibility.

It is understood that China Mobiles project is divided into two packages, with a total procurement scale of about 400 million yuan. Gree won 30% of the original bid, while Midea won 70%. After being disqualified, the holding subsidiary of Midea Group Co., Ltd. won all shares.

In order to promote the open, fair and fair development of enterprise bidding and procurement work, and purify the business environment, the relevant information of Chongqing United, the successful bidder found in China Mobiles bidding project, is now released to the public.

1. Inconsistent invoice information

On September 5, 2019, we found that the invoice information of Chongqing Midea was inconsistent in the related information publicity of supplier information verification of high pressure water chiller centrifugal chiller.

Figure 1 information publicity of China Mobile

In the State Administration of Taxation Chongqing Electronic Taxation Bureau, the buyer of the invoice is Chongqing Xinhang lanbao building materials Co., Ltd. and the invoice is sold on August 16, 2017, which is inconsistent with the information in the supplier certification information declaration form in Figure 1.

Figure 2 query results of national VAT invoice query system of State Administration of Taxation (No. 6)

Figure 3 query results of Chongqing Electronic Taxation Bureau of SAT (No. 6)

2. The technical parameters do not meet the bidding standards

When China Mobile bid for the 2017-2018 centralized procurement project of high-pressure centrifugal chillers, according to the public information, the maximum cooling capacity of AHRI laboratory in Chongqing Midea was 2200rt, which could not cover the bidding cooling capacity of 2500rt. As of February 26, 2020, the test bench certificate of Chongqing United States for 2017-2018 centralized procurement project of high pressure centrifugal chillers was not displayed on the AHRI official website. It was not until March 31, 2020 that the additional 3000rt test bench certificate of Chongqing United States was found.

The information released this time is only part of the information that can be publicly inquired. We will submit it to China Mobile again in combination with other issues, so as to treat and handle fairly.

In the process of enterprise bidding, such illegal acts as fraud and black box operation endanger Chinas business environment and hinder Chinas economic development. China Mobile and Gree are both industry leaders concerned by the society, and have the obligation to set an example for peers and society, and jointly maintain a good business environment.

July 6, 2002

At present, there are still many questions about whether Gree is really fraudulent and whether it is really reported by the United States. However, for Gree and Midea, as the two largest white TV giants in China and even in the world, there has been constant fighting between them. It has been more than ten years since Gree was reported to be disqualified from winning the bid. It is just a new enmity between them.

Fake! Gree was disqualified from bidding by China Mobile, and Midea won the bid

According to the announcement, in view of the fraud in China Mobiles centralized procurement project of high-pressure centrifugal chillers from 2020 to 2021, Gree Electric was decided to make two decisions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the bidding law of the peoples Republic of China, the procurement documents and the handling rules for negative behaviors of primary centralized purchasers of China Mobile Punishment.