Yang Zi was fined 100000 for forgery of evidence in the case of reputation infringement!

category:Global
 Yang Zi was fined 100000 for forgery of evidence in the case of reputation infringement!


According to Beijing Internet, in May 2020, the court tried a case of network tort liability dispute. The plaintiff Yang said that Zhang repeatedly made statements inconsistent with the facts and damaging Yangs reputation on the microblog account registered in his real name, so he sued Zhang to the Beijing Internet court for the infringement of his reputation right. The reporter of Nandu inquires China open court trial net and finds that Yang is Yang Zi.

During the court investigation, the defendant Zhang said that Weibo was not registered by him. This is not consistent with the account information that the judge retrieved from the background of microblog. Zhang, the defendant, said in court that his ID card and mobile phone had been lost, and his micro blog account was not owned by him, and he issued an electronic version of the identity information issued by the police station.

According to the report, Zhang submitted several certificates with the official seal of the public security organ and the signature of the police, all of which said that Zhang alerted the police due to the loss of his mobile phone and ID card. To further verify the evidence, the judge sent letters of assistance to the two public security organs. Both public security organs replied that the certification materials provided by Zhang were not issued by their own public security organs and their seals were not stamped by their own public security organs.

The Beijing Internet court formed a collegial panel to hear the case again. The reporter of Nandu noted that after the collegial panel showed the reply letter of the public security organ to the defendant Zhang and informed him that he should bear legal responsibility for submitting false evidence, Zhang still insisted that the proof materials were true.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u6056789,container:ssp_ 6056789, async:true }The three judges of the collegial panel unanimously determined that the evidence materials provided by Zhang were forgeries. According to the collegial panel, Zhang forges multiple evidence materials of the public security organ and insists that the evidence is true in the court trial. The evidence materials have a significant impact on finding out whether Zhang is the micro blog registrant involved in the case. Zhangs behavior seriously hinders the courts hearing of the case, and the circumstances are extremely serious, which constitutes paragraph 1, paragraph 1, Article 111 of the Civil Procedure Law of the peoples Republic of China The circumstances under which the peoples court is impeded in the trial of a case by forging important evidence. According to the first paragraph of Article 115 of the Civil Procedure Law of the peoples Republic of China, Zhang was fined 100000 yuan. The court said that the court will investigate the legal responsibility of the parties who are lucky, trying to cover up the truth of the facts by falsifying evidence and other illegal means, and hindering the courts hearing of the case.

The three judges of the collegial panel unanimously determined that the evidence materials provided by Zhang were forged. According to the collegial panel, Zhang forges multiple evidence materials of the public security organ and insists that the evidence is true in the court trial. The evidence materials have a significant impact on finding out whether Zhang is the micro blog registrant involved in the case. Zhangs behavior seriously hinders the courts hearing of the case, and the circumstances are extremely serious, which constitutes paragraph 1, paragraph 1, Article 111 of the Civil Procedure Law of the peoples Republic of China The circumstances under which the peoples court is impeded in the trial of a case by forging important evidence. According to the first paragraph of Article 115 of the Civil Procedure Law of the peoples Republic of China, Zhang was fined 100000 yuan.

The court said that the court will investigate the legal responsibility of the parties who are lucky, trying to cover up the truth of the facts by falsifying evidence and other illegal means, and hindering the courts hearing of the case.