The security guard was sentenced to death: to borrow money but not return it, to kill it and dismember the debtors

category:Hot
 The security guard was sentenced to death: to borrow money but not return it, to kill it and dismember the debtors


Lu Dongxiao, male, born on December 7, 1987, junior high school culture, was originally a security guard of shuiyinglanshan community, Duanzhou District, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, with his domicile in Leizhou City, Guangdong Province.

The first instance of Zhaoqing intermediate peoples court found that: the defendant LV Dongxiao and the victim Lin jianga once worked as security guards in Zhaoqing agile city. In April 2018, LV Dongxiao borrowed 50000 yuan from Lin jianga for gambling, and Lin jianga repeatedly urged LV Dongxiao to repay the debt.

At 16 oclock on October 22, Lin came to a community of Xingyuan Road, Jianshe Second Road, Duanzhou District, Zhaoqing City by motorcycle, entered LV Dongxiaos house in room 1020, and demanded LV Dongxiao to repay the debt.

At about 20 oclock, there was a language dispute between the two sides. LV Dongxiao used a beer bottle to hit Lins left temple and the middle of his head several times in the living room, then dragged Lin into the bathroom, and continued to hit Lins upper brain twice with a beer bottle, causing Lins death.

Later, LV Dongxiao dismembered Lins corpse into three parts and four pieces with a kitchen knife. Lins motorcycle was used to transport the corpse and tools in batches, and the corpse was thrown to different places.

On October 23, LV Dongxiao turned himself in.

[court decision

According to the first instance of Zhaoqing intermediate peoples court, the defendant LV Dongxiao intentionally and illegally deprived the life of another person, resulting in the death of one person, whose act has constituted the crime of intentional homicide.

LV Dongxiao surrendered himself and confessed his crime truthfully. He could be given a lighter punishment according to law. However, LV Dongxiaos criminal motive is despicable, the nature of the crime is extremely bad, the means of committing the crime is extremely ferocious, and the consequences are extremely serious, and he has not compensated the victims loss, and has no performance of repentance, so he will not be given a lighter punishment.

Due to the criminal act of the defendant LV Dongxiao, which caused the death of the victim Lin, according to law, he should bear the civil liability of compensation for the material loss caused by the death of the victim Lin, who is the elder brother of Lin.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u6056789,container:ssp_ 6056789, async:true });})(); The court of first instance ruled that Lu Dongxiao, the defendant, committed the crime of intentional homicide, was sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life; Lu Dongxiao, the defendant, paid RMB 46784.5 yuan for the material losses of the plaintiffs Lin, B and C in the incidental civil action within 10 days from the date of the legal effect of the judgment; and rejected other claims of the plaintiffs Lin, B and C in the incidental civil action. The appellant LV Dongxiao and his defenders put forward that when the victim collects the debt, he reviles LV Dongxiao and makes a mistake first; LV Dongxiaos killing is to protect his family and defend himself. Lu Dongxiao is willing to compensate the victims for their economic losses and requests the court of second instance to change its judgment from a lighter one. According to the second instance of Guangdong Higher Peoples court, the facts of the original judgment are clear, the evidence is true and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, the sentence is appropriate, and the trial procedure is legal. The reason for appeal and defense opinions put forward by the appellant LV Dongxiao and his defenders are not tenable and shall not be adopted. The second instance shall rule to reject the appeal and maintain the original judgment. The death penalty for murdering a 7-year-old boy after long-term drug abuse has been implemented. Source: Yangcheng Evening News Author: Dong Liu editor in charge: Hu Shuli_ MN7479

The court of first instance ruled that Lu Dongxiao, the defendant, committed the crime of intentional homicide, was sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life; Lu Dongxiao, the defendant, paid RMB 46784.5 yuan for the material losses of the plaintiffs Lin, B and C in the incidental civil action within 10 days from the date of the legal effect of the judgment; and rejected other claims of the plaintiffs Lin, B and C in the incidental civil action.

The appellant LV Dongxiao and his defenders put forward that when the victim collects the debt, he reviles LV Dongxiao and makes a mistake first; LV Dongxiaos killing is to protect his family and defend himself. Lu Dongxiao is willing to compensate the victims for their economic losses and requests the court of second instance to change its judgment from a lighter one.

According to the second instance of Guangdong Higher Peoples court, the facts of the original judgment are clear, the evidence is true and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, the sentence is appropriate, and the trial procedure is legal.