Why does India get along badly with its neighbors? Media: because it always wants to be a big brother

category:Hot
 Why does India get along badly with its neighbors? Media: because it always wants to be a big brother


In the past decades, there have been three large-scale wars and one small-scale war between India and Pakistan. Since the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947, relations between the two countries have been in a state of hostility and tension for most of the time due to the Kashmir issue. In the mid January 2016 issue of India today weekly, modi was cautiously optimistic about the neighboring countries first policy: the foreign policy of neighboring countries first is moving on the right path, and modi has gained the reputation of openness and flexibility in Pakistan. This provides him with more options when dealing with relations with Pakistan. Most importantly, Modi is learning how to deal with Pakistan, and knows who to deal with: in Pakistan, the army has the final say; for Pakistan, Kashmir is very important; the interests of all the different interests in Pakistan are different. But in the past few years, India Pakistan relations have not improved significantly. In February 2019, a number of Indian military aircraft flew over the actual control line of Kashmir region to launch air strikes against Pakistan, which led to air war between the two countries, which once worried international public opinion that the fourth India Pakistan war was imminent.

India is paying for modis short-sighted China strategy! BIM bhuttel, an international relations scholar at Kathmandu University in Nepal, wrote on the website of the Asian times on June 17, reminding Indian Prime Minister modi that those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it. And a month ago, BIM Buttel wrote about modis neighbor first fiasco in Nepal.. During his five years in office, modi visited Nepal four times in a row and in a uproar, but the relationship between the two countries has reached a new record low, he wrote. In Kathmandus view, India is trying to expand its core interests while suffering in Nepal. The article mentions that two landmark events have brought Nepal India relations to the bottom: the first one is after Nepal experienced a huge earthquake in April 2015, because the new constitution of Nepal is different from Indias opinion, India has imposed a material embargo on Nepal, while most of Nepals fuel oil, gas and other materials need to be imported from India, and Indias embargo has a great impact on Nepals peoples livelihood; the second one is India The construction of roads in karapani region has damaged Nepals territorial sovereignty, and the new map released by Nepal has become the indispensable weapon to fight back against India. BIM btel concluded that under the banner of Hindu revivalism, modis foreign policy in neighboring countries had collapsed. India has been trying to persuade its immediate neighbors and allies to support its efforts to promote the reform of the UN Security Council so as to seek to become a permanent member, he concluded. However, a country that does not respect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of small States runs counter to the spirit of the Charter of the United Nations. The international community will be keen to observe Indias loss of soft power as a result of its border dispute with Nepal.

There are also some reflections in India. Indias economic times said in a June 19 commentary entitled when tensions were brewing between China and India, modi found that neighboring countries remained silent. if modi wanted to gain general support from his neighbors in the face of the most important diplomatic challenges, he was wrong. The article holds that modi has been taking bold measures to build a strong image in dealing with the difficult relations between neighboring countries for a long time, but now he is faced with the task of easing the tense relations with China, and needs to take a cautious route in the upsurge of nationalism enthusiasm and the search for a peaceful solution to the crisis. Modis priority of neighboring countries policy has helped India solve the Enclave problem with Bangladesh and eased relations with Sri Lanka. But the confrontation and conflict between India and the three countries at the same time in the border area shows the problem that Indias hegemonic mentality is hard to change. In addition, modi manipulates Hindu nationalism and increasingly deviates from the original intention of the priority of neighboring countries policy, which once again causes the doubts and concerns of neighboring countries and makes some long-term trade and security partners uncomfortable. For example, Bangladeshs foreign minister has been delaying a visit to India because of an amendment to the citizenship law at the end of last year.

In an interview with the global times, Khalid Rahman, director of the Islamabad Institute of policy research in Pakistan, said that transferring peoples attention to domestic focus issues through foreign military operations has become a conventional means of the BJP government led by modi. Populism is becoming a challenge for Indias development, Rahman said. No matter the BJP or other political parties, Indias elite can hardly avoid the influence of populism under the democratic system. Whats more, the Indian media is also full of populism. They carry out malicious propaganda and reports against neighboring countries, deliberately provoking peoples hostility to other countries, which makes the situation worse.

Asking a lot of money for not being a second rate country

In an interview with the global times, the chairman of Pakistans Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, mushad Hussain, said, Indias provocation to China is not only to win the favor of the west, but also to divert its peoples attention from the failure of the Indian governments foreign policy, which is caused by the failure of the Indian governments foreign policy, as well as the poor epidemic prevention and economic development s domestic predicament. Indias policy in South Asia is mainly divided into two parts: one is regional hegemonism aimed at its smaller neighbors; the other is that it is willing to be the agent of the west to contain China out of envy of Chinas development, Hussein said. India is now a hegemonic regional bully. In addition to China, India is also aggressively violating the interests of other neighboring countries such as Pakistan and Nepal. India should realize that the size of a country is not equal to its strength. It is wrong to seek to be Chinas opponent, which will be counterproductive and doomed to failure.

At present, China, Pakistan and Nepal have territorial disputes with India, which makes peace and stability in the region more complicated. Koinara, founder of Nepal International Strategic Research Center, believes that all these disputes should be resolved through dialogue, let professionals sit down and negotiate on the basis of evidence and historical facts, only in this way can we promote the resolution of the problem..

Because special relationship always wants to be big brother

There is only a narrow strait between Sri Lanka, an island country of the Indian Ocean, and India in the South Asian subcontinent. Reporters from the global times have visited Sri Lanka for many times. When local people talk about ethnic conflicts between Tamils and sinhalas in China, they always mention the Indian shadow behind the conflicts. In view of the special historical and geographical ties, maintaining friendly relations with India is the focus of Sri Lankas foreign policy. However, Indias performance during Sri Lankas civil war, especially its secret funding of Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, still makes many Sri Lankans feel estranged from India. India is also unhappy with Sri Lankas proximity to China in the reconstruction process. Sri Lankas putram power plant director once told reporters that Sri Lanka was riddled with holes at the end of the civil war, and countries like India were not willing to invest in Sri Lanka at all.

India has always regarded its surrounding areas as the basis for becoming a great power, but its constant involvement in the affairs and diplomacy of neighboring countries has made Sri Lanka, Nepal and other neighboring countries uncomfortable. Some Sri Lankan scholars said that, in fact, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh and other Indias neighboring countries have paid great attention to balancing. That is to say, every project cooperated with China will give India almost the same project, but Indias efficiency is too low.

These so-called disputed territories are of great strategic value to India, guarding the shortest distance between Chinas Tibet and Indias capital, New Delhi, abishak tapa, chairman of the Youth League of the National Democratic Party of Nepal, told the Global Times special correspondent in Nepal. Historically, India has set up 18 outposts in the border area between China and Nepal on the land of Nepal. During the reign of mahandra, the former king of Nepal, India agreed to withdraw these outposts from the land of Nepal, but the outposts in the disputed territory have not yet been withdrawn. Nepal is a land locked country, tapa said bluntly. There are only two neighboring countries, China and India. A large number of necessities need to be imported from India, which gives India an advantage in Nepal India relations, leading India to sometimes even determine our internal affairs.

Anupan, a senior journalist of Nepals national news agency, published an article on Indias foreign affairs website on June 18, which analyzed five factors driving Nepals anti India sentiment: first, India carried out three material blockades on Nepal in 1975, 1989 and 2015; second, territorial disputes between Nepal and India and the current situation of the opening of the border between Nepal and India, frequent cross-border murders by Indian forces or the Nigerian side People were blackmailed by the border forces of India; third, India vigorously publicized the fact that the Buddha was born in India in spite of the fact that the Buddha was born in Nepal; fourth, India habitually thought Nepal was a little brother, while Nepal did not think India was a big brother; Fifth, the Nepalese public believed that many agreements between Nepal and India were only beneficial to India, such as the Nepal India friendship signed in 1950 The treaty is very unpopular in Nepal and is considered by the public to be a treaty that places Nepal under the umbrella of India. When Prime Minister Prachanda visited India in 2008, he proposed to review the relevant treaties again, but there was no progress more than ten years later.

Is this the end of the special relationship? Recently, the Nepalese writer murmi wrote in the media that Nepal has long been dissatisfied with Indias regional hegemony, it is increasingly clear that Nepal wants to get rid of the special relationship . At the end of the article, murmi stressed that anti Indian doctrine has promoted Nepals politics for 70 years. Now it needs to determine the future of bilateral relations.

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u6056789,container:ssp_ 6056789, async:true }(1);}) (); relevant recommendations: Indias armed forces are increasing along the border; the navy is strictly guarding against Chinese submarine experts_ NB12712