Lawyer of jiangge case

category:Hot
 Lawyer of jiangge case


On April 13, 2020, Jiang Qiulian received the court summons, indicating that the case is scheduled to be heard in Xiazhuang court of Chengyang District Peoples Court of Qingdao on June 30. According to CCTV news

Previously, Huang Leping, the lawyer acting for the plaintiff in the case, released a video on social media, saying he decided to represent Jiang Qiulian after learning about her. Both the lawyer team and I hope that the case will return to the legal level, and that the public will see the right and wrong of the case from the legal perspective.

On the morning of the 5th, Jiang Qiulian wrote on social media, 1310 dark days Girl, Ive kept you waiting for a long time. Ive never stopped begging for justice for you. Today is the first day for my mother to go to court with Liu Xin. My mother is both expecting and nervous.

In an interview with the media, Huang Leping said that Jiang Qiulian had made some comments on Weibo and self media, hoping that people could understand her words and deeds if they saw her as an ordinary rural woman and an ordinary mother.

Screenshot of Huang lepingli, acting lawyer of jiangqiulian

According to Huang Leping, Jiang Qiulian decided not to attend the pre court meeting today because of her discomfort. Huang expressed regret that Liu Xin and her lawyer were not present. He hoped that the defendant or the lawyer could appear in the subsequent trial.

This case is not only a private affair of Jiang Qiulian and Liu Xin, but also a matter of public order, good customs and moral fashion of Chinese society. After that, we will try to restore it completely 10 minutes or more before the incident. Huang said.

Related knowledge link:

How to understand that the cause of prosecution is the dispute over the right to life?

Xu Aiguo, Professor, School of law, Peking University:

The special relationship between the third person (Liu Xin) and the victim (Jiang GE) leads to a special duty of care for the victim, which means that the fault of the third person is not a cause of the victims death, which leads to a duty of compensation for the victim. Therefore, the right to life is nothing more than seeking legal relief after your interests are violated.

Why is the pre-trial meeting called before the first trial?

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u6056789,container:ssp_ 6056789, async:true }The court may, before the formal hearing, require the parties to exchange some evidence before the hearing, or the pre-trial meeting, for some major and complicated and even significant social impact cases. Let both parties make a sorting out of their own evidence before the court session, which is the recognized evidence and which is the evidence with objections. Then the claims of prosecution and defense of both parties play the role of summarizing and sorting out the evidence and the focus of disputes in advance. Can the evidence of foreign judicial organs be used in domestic civil cases? Is it legally effective? Xu Aiguo, Professor of Law School of Peking University: according to the judicial practice, it is usually provided by the notary office of the country where it is located. With the Japanese notary and the approval of the Chinese Consulate in Japan, it can have the effect of evidence in China. Related recommendation: jiangges mother claims more than 2.03 million yuan in the pre-trial meeting. Liu Xin, one of the party who did not attend the acting lawyer: jiangges mother feels cold for Liu Xins behavior. Jiangges mother v. Liu Xins right to life dispute will be called for the pre-trial meeting on the 5th. Source: Red Star news writer: Lan Jing, pan Junwen, Guo Yimeng, editor in charge: Hua Chengyu_ NBJ11143

For some important and complicated cases with great social influence, the court can ask the parties to exchange some evidence before the formal court session, or pre court meeting. Let both parties make a sorting out of their own evidence before the court session, which is the recognized evidence and which is the evidence with objections. Then the claims of prosecution and defense of both parties play the role of summarizing and sorting out the evidence and the focus of disputes in advance.

Can the evidence of foreign judicial organs be used in domestic civil cases? Is it legally effective?

Xu Aiguo, Professor, School of law, Peking University:

According to the judicial practice, it is usually provided by the notary office of the country where it is located. With the notarization of Japan and the approval of the Chinese Consulate in Japan, it can have the effect of evidence in China.