77 Nobel Prize winners protested against the cancellation of federal funding for us research institutions

category:Hot
 77 Nobel Prize winners protested against the cancellation of federal funding for us research institutions


A Nobel laureate said the federal grant was cancelled a few days after President trump answered a reporters question. At the time, the reporter mistakenly claimed that the federal grant was millions of dollars to researchers in Wuhan. Trump immediately said the allocation would be terminated immediately.

A few days after trump answered questions in April, the National Institutes of health sent a letter to Peter daszak, the head of the ecological health alliance, US media reported. They said they questioned the cooperation between the ecological health alliance and a research institute in Wuhan. After e-mailing each other, Peter dassack was informed that more than $3 million in federal funding from the ecological health alliance had been cancelled.

Harold wamurs, a Nobel laureate and former president of the National Institutes of health, said the governments prioritization of research projects that some scientists may not agree with was also a routine operation, but the study of the ecological health alliance was fully in line with the federal governments priorities. Harold Wames called the cancellation of federal funding for national health research a shameless abuse of political power to control scientific work..

(function(){( window.slotbydup=window .slotbydup||[]).push({id:u5811557,container:ssp_ 5811557, async:true }Richard Roberts, who called on 77 Nobel laureates to jointly write to the National Institutes of health, the Nobel Prize winner in physiology or medicine, and the chief scientific officer of the New England biological laboratory, said that when he sent an email to other Nobel laureates calling for joint writing, everyones response was very positive, and everyone quickly replied. u201dRichard Roberts pointed out that there is clear evidence that the coronavirus epidemic sweeping the world at this time originated in bats, so the research on the coronavirus in bats is particularly important, but if we cut off the funding source of those important people against the coronavirus at this time, when can the epidemic stop? 77 it is without rhyme or reason. The winners of novel coronavirus pneumonia are politicized by the United States and a very dangerous precedent is that the federal government can withdraw funds without any reason for scientific research projects with value. At present, neither the National Institutes of health nor the Department of health and human services has commented on or responded to the joint writing of 77 Nobel Prize winners. Related recommended research: new coronavirus or recombinant from bat pangolin coronavirus Journal of nature: pangolin may be a potential intermediate host of new coronavirus_ NBJ10752

Richard Roberts, who called on 77 Nobel laureates to jointly write to the organizers of the National Institutes of health, Nobel Laureate in physiology or medicine, and chief scientific officer of the New England biological laboratory, said that when he sent an email to other Nobel laureates calling for joint writing, everyones response was very positive, and everyone quickly replied.

77 it is without rhyme or reason. The winners of novel coronavirus pneumonia are politicized by the United States and a very dangerous precedent is that the federal government can withdraw funds without any reason for scientific research projects with value.

At present, neither the National Institutes of health nor the Department of health and human services has commented on or responded to the joint writing of 77 Nobel Prize winners.