Yu Yuyu wants to hold a symposium on chapter snatching, which leads Li Guoqings behavior to criminal

category:Internet
 Yu Yuyu wants to hold a symposium on chapter snatching, which leads Li Guoqings behavior to criminal


Yu Yus team set the discussion direction of experts in the email, such as combining Li Guoqings act of seizing chapter with bitcontinentals act of seizing business license.

The main topics discussed in the symposium include:

The first is to classify the cases of chapter snatching and business license, compare Li Guoqing with the employees of Bitian mainland who have been taken compulsory measures, discuss how to interpret and implement the criminal law regulations at present, and guide the economic dispute cases to the criminal direction;

The second is to discuss the equity in marriage property, and how to interpret the current equity ratio of industrial and commercial registration in divorce litigation.

In terms of organizers and experts, the email shows that the symposium will be hosted by a daily newspaper or its subordinate newspapers and magazines, and will be online or offline. At the same time, 3-5 experts will be interviewed, and 2-3 experts will be interviewed by the special issue.

It is worth noting that although the total cost is uncertain, it is revealed in the email that the cost to a professor of a law school in Shanghai is expected to be 100000.

On the list of participants, Yu Yu stressed whether law experts choose the authors who have written books and sold them in Dangdang? The host doesnt have to be a legal expert, but he should have some eloquence and the ability to round his words.

It can be seen that it is very necessary and meaningful to hold chapter snatching forum, and the topics set are also the focus of public attention.

However, the case of Li Guoqings Chapter snatching is more complicated, and the discussion should also be analyzed in detail:

First, the nature of Li Guoqing and bitcontinental events is different.

The former happened in the company, Li left the receipt, and claimed that the staff could use the seal at any time, which had its civilization; the latter happened in the administrative service agency, which objectively disturbed the distribution process and normal work order. After the bitland incident, the public security soon took compulsory measures against it, and the Li Guoqing incident is probably still an economic dispute in the final analysis.

Secondly, information blind spots should be eliminated before discussion.

According to the analysis of Zhao occupation lawyer before, the key to the case is whether the shareholders meeting is legal. Yu Yufang claimed that he did not know the convening of the shareholders meeting, but in Li Guoqings statement to Dangdang employees, he mentioned that Yu Yu had been informed. At present, this situation is unable to determine Li Guoqings act of seizing chapter.

Third, we should not be both athletes and referees, and experts in the forum should not be stakeholders.

It is meaningful, but it should not be initiated by one of the parties. It should be hosted by an independent third party with no interest relationship, and the experts should also have no interest relationship.

However, according to the information disclosed in the email, although a newspaper is the organizer, Yu Yu has a cooperative relationship with a newspaper, and experts still charge a lot of fees. The objectivity of notarization is questionable, which may interfere with justice and public opinion.

Reuters: NASDAQ informed Ruixing that coffee must be delisted and Baidu left behind? The net profit doubled under the epidemic. Robin Li rose overnight. 6 billion 300 million Shanghais first suspension of Feng Xiao District self built express frame: unlimited time free hosting. NBJ11279