Reporters also learned from people familiar with the situation that Zhang Youjun had been removed from the restricted high consumption list.
According to the information of judgment document network, on April 6, 2018, Yu Guojing (who was a resident of Taiwan at that time) and CITIC Securities were adjudicated in the first instance by the peoples Court of Futian District, Shenzhen city due to the dispute over the confirmation of the rights of securities investment funds.
Yu Guojing, the plaintiff, sued that he had handled the securities fund account in the name of Yu GuQing (the first generation ID card) in CITIC Securities around 2002, because the ID card could not be upgraded to the second generation ID card, and the ID card was lost in 2010, but Yu Guojing signed the application in person and knew the password of the account.
As Yu Guojing, the plaintiff of this case, is a resident of Taiwan, and this case is a commercial case involving Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, the case was transferred to the peoples Court of Qianhai cooperation zone of Shenzhen City for jurisdiction.
At present, the latest ruling documents have not been published by the website.
However, it can be seen from the content of the order that CITIC Securities failed to return more than 100000 yuan involved in litigation to Yu Guojings account on time.
According to relevant contents, because CITIC Securities failed to perform the payment obligations specified in the effective legal documents within the period specified in the enforcement notice, the peoples Court of Qianhai cooperation zone, Shenzhen, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, restricted Zhang Youjun, the legal representative and principal of CITIC Securities and its units, from high consumption and consumption behaviors not necessary for life and work.
These high consumption behaviors include choosing the second-class or above class seats of plane, train soft sleeper and ship when taking the means of transportation, and high consumption in hotels, hotels, nightclubs, golf courses and other places.
CITIC Securities responded to the media late on the 15th that Mr. Zhang Youjuns work and travel are all normal at present. As for the cause of the dispute, the person in charge of CITIC Securities said that it was a dispute between an individual customer and the companys business department in the implementation of the companys anti money laundering work, involving an amount of RMB 139800. CITIC Securities shall act in accordance with the law and strictly implement all regulatory provisions, without any failure to perform the effective judgment.
Zheng Mingwei, a lawyer from Guangdong Jingtian law firm, told economic observer.com that generally speaking, after the courts judgment comes into effect and the enterprise fails to fulfill its payment obligation, the court will take measures to limit the high consumption of the legal person in charge of the enterprise. If an investor does not have a mainland account, the court may also designate an account to be transferred to the investor by the court. The company will also be notified in advance before the issuance of the restraining order, and the court will be more rigorous in the procedure. Similar to CITIC Securities, this incident is relatively rare. There may be any misunderstanding or poor communication.