Peng Bo was sentenced to 4 years in the first trial of Jinan Rural Commercial Bank report

category:Finance
 Peng Bo was sentenced to 4 years in the first trial of Jinan Rural Commercial Bank report


In June 2019, the defendant Peng Bo gave the hearsay and subjective speculation of the false material to Wang Yuan saw processing and agreed with Peng Bo. After the two people passed the WeChat public number nicknamed Deputy Supervisor Xiao Peng, the Baidu headline account of Bloomberg, the Baidu account of Deputy Supervisor Xiao Peng, and the micro-blog account of Jinan agricultural business bank informer Bloomberg were published online. More than 50 articles and information have been published, such as the report of Shandong provincial level cadres living in promiscuity and the loss of bank assets of nearly 3 billion yuan. It includes Jinan agricultural commercial bank conceals financial fraud cases, resulting in bank asset loss of nearly 3 billion yuan, Ding and Zong, Wang and Lu have improper sexual relations and have children, Bloomberg was degraded in violation of regulations, no response to letters and reports, provincial agricultural credit cooperatives fund center has a small treasury which has not been traced to Shandong Hongfan Energy Technology Co., Ltd Loss caused by loan and other false information. The above articles and information were reprinted and reported by more than 10 online media, such as Sina, Sohu, Phoenix, Tencent, etc., causing a large number of hits, forwarding and negative comments by netizens, with more than 10 million hits, causing serious public disorder. On September 6, 2019, the defendant Bloomberg was arrested by the public security organ.

According to the peoples Court of Lixia District, Jinan City, Shandong Province, the defendant, Bloomberg, in order to seek the improper benefits of his position and rank, made mistakes by taking advantage of his reasons, colluded with others to fabricate false information, spread it on the information network wantonly, made trouble, and was reprinted and reported by many media, causing a large number of Internet users to click, comment, confuse the public, and cause serious confusion in public order It is a crime of provocation. According to the facts, nature, circumstances and degree of harm to society of the defendants Bloomberg crime, and in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, the court made the above judgment.