Li Tianyis band in prison 6 hours later

category:Hot
 Li Tianyis band in prison 6 hours later


Sure enough, less than six hours later, public opinion reversed.

At 11:40 p.m. that night, Beijing Municipal prison administration released a briefing, which made it clear that Li Tianyi was serving a sentence in Beijing, band formation was a rumor, and the photos on the Internet were the photos of other prison organized criminal rehearsal programs in 2004, which did not contain Li Tianyi at all.

As netizens said, rumors dont stay overnight and all questions are answered, the refutation of Beijing prison administration deserves praise.

Reason 1: positive response

Unsubstantiated rumors pervade the network. It cant be deleted or blocked.

Although the response of Beijing prison bureau is short, it is smart. Jingintrepid is jingintrepid in a positive response. Ding Mao is Ding Mao, facing the most concerned issues of netizens, and making it clear at one time.

What is authority? Sometimes authority doesnt depend on what department the final settlement is, but on whether it can answer the questions positively. In the face of the rumors of right and wrong, people often say, let the bullets fly for a while, wait for the official reply. Only every official reply can not evade and avoid, can let the netizens go through the authoritative baptism again and again, and form the good habit of waiting for the first class.

If not, its just the empty talk of hundreds of millions of netizens required by SAGE standard.

Reason 2: refute rumors in time

The worlds martial arts are only fast. Netizens joked how fast the reply was

I havent seen the rumor yet

From 6:00 p.m., one vote of big V forwarded the Li Tianyi prison band network, and by 11:40 p.m., the official microblog account of Beijing prison administration, Beijing prison and drug rehabilitation released the information of rumor refutation, which was less than 6 hours away from rumor fermentation.

What does a simple word Kuai mean? At least, it shows that the Department responding is an efficient department, without the red tape of information transmission to consume the patience of the public; at least, it shows that this department is a responsible department, and will not take the concerns of the people as a gust of wind.

Reason 3: specific refutation

How to achieve only one truth?

The response of Beijing prison administration has made a good example: block the space of reasonable imagination of netizens with detailed evidence - the time is 15 years ago, the location is in a prison outside the city, the characters have nothing to do with it, and the photos are well documented in public reports

Since the rumored big V dont have the time and ability to find out the truth, then put the most direct and effective evidence in front of you.

To tell netizens that this information is a rumor is not only to give a pale conclusion, but to give an unshakable truth based on specific facts. This is the expectation of netizens, and it is the bounden responsibility of the response department.

The greater the connotation, the smaller the extension. This is common sense and the law of refutation.

Reason 4: resolute attitude

This refutation shows that it is not the official tune of wearing a mask, but the declaration of feeling and attitude.

For the malicious rumor and speculation author who publishes and spreads false information, our bureau will investigate his legal responsibility through the public security organ according to law. The Internet is the common spiritual home of hundreds of millions of people. Whoever creates a miasma in it should be punished by law. For cheating the public, disturbing the order of cyberspace and consuming public resources, we can only take the way of severe punishment without loan.

The political and legal organs will not allow those with ulterior motives to poke peoples sense of security, let alone the rumor maker to eat human blood steamed bread and sprinkle salt on the wound of the victim!

Find out the rumor and malicious speculation author, is also to give the majority of law-abiding netizens a confession. No matter online or offline, let us see the firm belief and steadfast action of safeguarding fairness and justice, so as to build a stronger sense of security in peoples hearts, and then a stronger one.

Reason 5: network coverage

In a briefing, Beijing Municipal prison administration is not alone.

At the same time, China changan.com and an Jian, the chief of the political and Law Commission of the Central Committee of the peoples Republic of China, issued authoritative voice for the first time, and all major network platforms have forwarded and pushed. The peoples daily, China news network, global times and other news media also transmit the message of refutation through their own new media platform, and transmit the facts to the netizens at the first time.

From micro-blog, WeChat, to todays headlines, penguin, and then to the jitter, B station, vertical to horizontal, to the side, there is a new network media where there is a full coverage of this rumor information.

It is said that rumor breaking with one mouth, rumor breaking with one leg. With the joint efforts of all platforms and all levels of network new media, we can make rumor breaking deeper and more thorough, and make rumor breaking become the past style.

(function() {(window. Slotbydup = window. Slotbydup| []). Push ({ID: u5811557, container: ssp_, async: true});))); a reversal within six hours, let us see more clearly: accept the supervision of public opinion, listen to the needs of netizens, respond to the concerns of the masses, only through benign interaction, can we turn the refutation into an open lesson of the rule of law for the whole people to maintain justice. Source: An Jian, director of the political and Law Commission of the CPC Central Committee, editor in charge: Shi Jianlei, nbj11331

A reversal within six hours, let us see more clearly: accept the supervision of public opinion, listen to the needs of netizens, respond to the concerns of the masses, only through benign interaction, can we turn the rumor refutation over and over into an open lesson of the rule of law for the whole people to maintain justice.