Complaint submitted by Qingdao team for dissatisfaction with the decision and punishment: full resumption of the three referees blow and punishment

category:Sports
 Complaint submitted by Qingdao team for dissatisfaction with the decision and punishment: full resumption of the three referees blow and punishment


After the match, Zhang Beihai, general manager of Guoxin double star club, who supervised the match on the spot, decided to file a complaint according to the normal process of the League after communicating with the coaching team.

According to the reporter, Guoxins complaint is divided into two parts: one is to complain about Adamss technical foul. After the game, Guoxin Double Star asked the on-the-spot competition supervisor again, and learned that Adams was abusing the referee before receiving a technical foul. But after the game, when he asked Adams himself, he got a negative answer. Accordingly, the club filed a complaint, hoping to cancel the technical foul against Adams. Secondly, Guoxin double star has formally passed the competition supervision and filed a complaint to the CBA Commission. Guoxin double star believes that when the referee on duty for the host and guest teams, the penalty is not the same, the referee in the penalty, many times ignored the host team defensive players to the guest team offensive players provocative action. In this case, Guoxin Double Star asked the Commission to make a full resumption of the three referees decisions. This season, Guoxin double star team has been wrongly judged and misjudged in the away games one after another, especially in the away games with Shanghai team, it is because of an obvious misjudgment that they lost the victory of the game. And in this game, they are in the lead, three people were sent off by the referee one after another, resulting in the final defeat. However, according to the regulations, even if the appeal is successful, the result of the game cannot be changed, but Guoxin double star team still hopes to express the purpose of pursuing fairness in the form of appeal. Source: Qingdao Morning Post Author: promised editor: Qiao yuanlei ufe50 ns1098

According to the reporter, Guoxins complaint is divided into two parts: one is to complain about Adamss technical foul. After the game, Guoxin Double Star asked the on-the-spot competition supervisor again, and learned that Adams was abusing the referee before receiving a technical foul. But after the game, when he asked Adams himself, he got a negative answer. Accordingly, the club filed a complaint, hoping to cancel the technical foul against Adams. Secondly, Guoxin double star has formally passed the competition supervision and filed a complaint to the CBA Commission. Guoxin double star believes that when the referee on duty for the host and guest teams, the penalty is not the same, the referee in the penalty, many times ignored the host team defensive players to the guest team offensive players provocative action. In this case, Guoxin Double Star asked the Commission to make a full resumption of the three referees decisions.

This season, Guoxin double star team has been wrongly judged and misjudged in the away games one after another, especially in the away games with Shanghai team, it is because of an obvious misjudgment that they lost the victory of the game. And in this game, they are in the lead, three people were sent off by the referee one after another, resulting in the final defeat. However, according to the regulations, even if the appeal is successful, the result of the game cannot be changed, but Guoxin double star team still hopes to express the purpose of pursuing fairness in the form of appeal.