Experts of the US House of Representatives passing the Xinjiang related bill: suggest to push list of unreliable entities

 Experts of the US House of Representatives passing the Xinjiang related bill: suggest to push list of unreliable entities

The so-called 2019 Uyghur human rights policy bill was submitted to the US Senate on January 17, 2019 by Mark Rubio, a well-known US anti Chinese senator. Ironically, September 11 is the anniversary of the terrorist attacks on the United States. On this day, this double standard bill which seriously distorts Chinas efforts to combat terrorism and extremism was passed in the US Senate. In fact, before the bill was submitted to the house of Representatives, the U.S. government could not wait to come up with a series of measures against Xinjiang, China. On October 7, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that 20 Chinese government agencies and 8 enterprises would be included in the list of entities, on the grounds that the 28 entities are related to Xinjiangs crackdown on ethnic minorities. On October 8, the U.S. State Department imposed visa restrictions on some Chinese officials on the grounds of so-called detention or abuse of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang.

US government departments have issued Administrative Instructions in advance. Why do us anti Chinese lawmakers still submit bills in Congress? Whats the difference between the two? Yuan Zheng, a researcher at the American Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said in an interview with reporters from the global times and global network that the executive orders issued by the government departments can be cancelled at any time according to the actual situation. If the bill is finally signed by the president into a formal law, it will be very difficult to abolish it. There must be sufficient reasons, and then it will be discussed by the Congress The whole process is even more difficult than legislation. This is the essential difference between the two. Once the bill is passed, it can show that the U.S. intervention in Chinas Xinjiang affairs has entered a new stage. From the perspective of the U.S. domestic, intervention in Xinjiang has become a legal basis , whether it is the administrative department or the Congress, and through long-term speculation to intervene in Xinjiang affairs.

This is another manifestation of the US governments serious interference in Chinas internal affairs, a violation of international law and the basic norms of international relations, and a provocation against the Chinese people. Wei Jianguo, vice president of the China International Economic Exchange Center and former Vice Minister of the Ministry of Commerce, said in an interview with the Global Times - that China is no longer being slaughtered as before, and that the U.S. Congress is not allowed to continue to dictate to China. According to Wei Jianguo, China can take tough measures against the USs bill, including making a list of unreliable entities when necessary, and strictly restricting the visits and activities of some US personnel involved in promoting the bill in China, these people should not think its up to them, they should smear China, and the Chinese will remember you.

Diao Daming, an associate professor at the school of international relations at Renmin University of China, said that effective countermeasures should first be a response at the level of discourse power. It is the most important to make clear what the facts are and to convey the real voice to the international community. As for the politicians pushing the bill, they can be countered to some extent, including some non-governmental organizations that maliciously distort Xinjiangs affairs and the behind the scenes. Diao Daming also believes that the introduction of the list of unreliable entities for the United States should be considered, including enterprises with strong substitutability that dance with the bill of the United States. The American way is that domestic law is superior to international law. Can we study and set our own agenda? It could be a direction of thinking.

(function() {(window. Slotbydup = window. Slotbydup| []). Push ({ID: 6374560, container: ssp_6374560, size: 300250, display: inlay fix, async: true});))); (source: Global Times Author: Fan Lingzhi, Xie Wenting, editor in charge: Xiao qi_nn6799)