The head teacher repeatedly raped two 10-year-old girls and was found to have molested five others

category:Hot
 The head teacher repeatedly raped two 10-year-old girls and was found to have molested five others


The Supreme Procuratorate issued a typical case of carrying forward the spirit of the Constitution and implementing the provisions of the constitution. Photo source: highest inspection

On December 3, the supreme prosecution office held the 33rd open day of procuratorial work with the theme of carrying forward the spirit of the constitution, promoting the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity, and issued a typical case of carrying forward the spirit of the Constitution and implementing the provisions of the constitution. Cover journalists learned from the Supreme Procuratorate that in the seven typical cases, the typical cases of protecting the legitimate rights of minors are included.

From the summer of 2011 to October of 2012, Qi Mou, the defendant, took advantage of such opportunities as lunch break, evening self-study and dormitory check to commit adultery and indecency on a (10-year-old) and B (10-year-old) girls in school offices, classrooms, bathrooms, boys dormitories, etc., and raped them at home on the grounds of taking a girl out to see a doctor. Qi also molested 5 other girls (10-11 years old) in female dormitory and other places.

On April 14, 2013, the local intermediate peoples court found that Qi had committed the crime of rape and sentenced him to death with a two-year reprieve, depriving him of political rights for life. After the judgment takes effect, it shall be reported to the Provincial Higher Peoples court for review. The higher peoples court ruled to cancel the original judgment and remand it for retrial on the ground that some facts of the original judgment were not clear. After a retrial, the intermediate peoples court made a decision on life imprisonment and deprivation of political rights for life. Qi refused to appeal. After hearing the case, the Provincial Higher Peoples court made a final judgment and decided to impose a fixed-term imprisonment of 10 years and deprivation of political rights for one year.

According to the request of the provincial Procuratorate, the Supreme Procuratorate filed a protest to the Supreme Peoples court in accordance with the trial supervision procedure, stating that the facts of this case are clear, the evidence is indeed sufficient, and the circumstances are abominable. The judgment of the Provincial Higher Peoples court belongs to the applicable law error, and the sentence is extremely light. In July 2018, the supreme law made a final judgment, fully adopted the opinion of the supreme prosecution and protest, determined that Qi, the defendant in the original trial, had committed the crime of rape and child molestation, and decided to execute life imprisonment and deprivation of political rights for life.

(function() {(window. Slotbydup = window. Slotbydup| []). Push ({ID: 6374560, container: ssp_, size: 300250, display: inlay fix, async: true});))); the Supreme Peoples Procuratorate filed a protest to the supreme people Strong determination and distinct attitude of crime cases. It is understood that the supreme prosecutor filed a protest in accordance with the law, and the supreme prosecutor personally attended the Supreme Court Trial Committee, which is the first time that the supreme prosecutor attended the Supreme Court Trial Committee, reflecting the firm attitude of the supreme prosecutor to crack down on crimes against minors. The Supreme Procuratorate issued the case as a guiding case in time, determined the evidence standard of sexual assault minors, and guided all regions to punish sexual assault minors accurately and effectively, which had a great impact on the society. In addition, in October 2018, according to the campus safety problems reflected in this case, combined with the relevant research, the Supreme Procuratorate issued No.1 procuratorial suggestion to the Ministry of education to promote the construction of campus safety and effectively prevent the illegal crimes against minors. Source: cover news Author: Su Yu editor in charge: Wang ning_nb12468

The Supreme Peoples Procuratorate protested to the Supreme Peoples court in accordance with the procedure of trial supervision on the grounds that the original judgment was wrong in the application of law and the sentence was too light, which fully reflected the strong determination and distinct attitude of the procuratorial organ to severely punish the cases of crimes against minors according to law.

It is understood that the supreme prosecutor filed a protest in accordance with the law, and the supreme prosecutor personally attended the Supreme Court Trial Committee, which is the first time that the supreme prosecutor attended the Supreme Court Trial Committee, reflecting the firm attitude of the supreme prosecutor to crack down on crimes against minors. The Supreme Procuratorate issued the case as a guiding case in time, determined the evidence standard of sexual assault minors, and guided all regions to punish sexual assault minors accurately and effectively, which had a great impact on the society.

In addition, in October 2018, according to the campus safety problems reflected in this case, combined with the relevant research, the Supreme Procuratorate issued No.1 procuratorial suggestion to the Ministry of education to promote the construction of campus safety and effectively prevent the illegal crimes against minors.