The owners are restricted to purchase electricity after refusing to pay the property service fee

category:Society
 The owners are restricted to purchase electricity after refusing to pay the property service fee


Without the consent of the owner, the property fee shall be increased, and the market supervision department shall order the rectification

Mr. Wangs family lives in Huaqingyuan community, Baqiao District, Xian City, which belongs to indemnificatory housing. In April this year, the property management announced that the property management fee would be increased from 0.44 yuan / m2 / month to 0.63 yuan / m2 / month. Property said the cost rose, and some owners did not pay property fees for a long time. Mr. Wang said that the property service in the community cant keep up with the standard, and the sanitation is poor. The owners feel that such service shouldnt increase the price, and the property shouldnt increase the price on the basis that some owners dont pay the property fee. This is to let other owners pay for these malicious owners who owe the fee.

Mr. Wang and other owners refused to pay the property fee after the rise, but also jointly signed against it and reported the matter to the market supervision department. Because of this, from April, when the owner went to the property to buy electricity, he was told that he could not buy it at will, I can only buy 50 degrees of electricity at a time, and some owners can only buy 10 degrees of electricity. Mr. Wang said that the property management wanted to intimidate everyone to agree to increase the price in this way. Many people couldnt help but pay the property management fee according to the new standard.

On April 25, Baqiao District Market Supervision Bureau issued an order for rectification notice to the property company of the community, saying that it increased the price without signing the property service contract, ordering it to immediately stop the price increase and return the fees collected.

Property owners who have not paid the property fee are declared to have registered the price increase due to power rationing

Those of us who didnt pay are still restricted from buying electricity. On November 1, Mr. Chen, the owner of the community, said that the rectification order didnt work and the property still went its own way. The property fee was charged according to the rising standard. The owner who refused to pay the property fee was still restricted from buying electricity. He could only buy 100 kilowatts of electricity on October 30.

The property management staff of the community said that the restriction of electricity purchase is only to let the owners in arrears pay the fees as soon as possible. There are 1983 households in the community, and the heating fee of this year has only paid more than 100 households so far. Last year, nearly 400 households failed to pay the heating fee. The community is an old community, and all the owners with the main valve open have heating, even if they dont pay the fee, they can enjoy the heating. Some owners are in arrears for nearly 10 years. These owners who are in arrears have infringed on the interests of other owners, so they can only be restricted in this way. They are gradually suing a small number of owners with serious arrears.

As for the increase in property fees, the staff said that they had filed with the price department in accordance with normal procedures after the rectification was ordered.

Market supervision department: non compliance of property price increase procedure

The relevant staff of Baqiao district market supervision bureau said that since June 2015, the price department has cancelled the issuance of charging license for operating units, which does not need to be recorded, and the government guided price for indemnificatory housing is implemented. At that time, the standard is 0.45 yuan / u33a1 / month, and each operating unit can adjust according to the actual situation, with the maximum increase of no more than 40%, that is, 0.63 yuan / u33a1 / month. As the price increase involves the public interests of the owners, it needs to be jointly participated by the neighborhood office, the community, the property management department and the police station to solicit the opinions of the owners on the scheme proposed by the property service enterprise for price adjustment. Only when the owners and the owners on site agree more than half, can the price increase. The property of Huaqingyuan community solicits opinions in the form of household investigation, which can not guarantee the authenticity of the owners signature and causes the owners complaint. In addition, the service quality should be improved at the same time of the price increase. The property did not write the standard and content of the service improvement in the form of a contract. The procedure was not compliant, so they issued a notice ordering rectification and suspended the price increase before the procedure was improved. We can only restrict from the aspect of price, and the property management department is responsible for the record of contract change of property service enterprises. The staff said that the price of the property after the rise did not exceed the governments guide price, but the procedure was against the rules. It was not mandatory to order the property to be rectified and could not fully restrict the property. On November 1, the reporter of the Chinese business daily consulted the land department of Chanba Ecological District Management Committee on this matter. The staff said that they could only accept the interview after the approval of the publicity department. Then the reporter contacted Chanba Management Committee Publicity Department staff, the other side said after consulting the relevant business departments to give a reply, but as of the time of publication, no reply had been received. Source: surging news editor: Shi Jianlei, nbj11331

The relevant staff of Baqiao district market supervision bureau said that since June 2015, the price department has cancelled the issuance of charging license for operating units, which does not need to be recorded, and the government guided price for indemnificatory housing is implemented. At that time, the standard is 0.45 yuan / u33a1 / month, and each operating unit can adjust according to the actual situation, with the maximum increase of no more than 40%, that is, 0.63 yuan / u33a1 / month. As the price increase involves the public interests of the owners, it needs to be jointly participated by the neighborhood office, the community, the property management department and the police station to solicit the opinions of the owners on the scheme proposed by the property service enterprise for price adjustment. Only when the owners and the owners on site agree more than half, can the price increase. The property of Huaqingyuan community solicits opinions in the form of household investigation, which can not guarantee the authenticity of the owners signature and causes the owners complaint. In addition, the service quality should be improved at the same time of the price increase. The property did not write the standard and content of the service improvement in the form of a contract. The procedure was not compliant, so they issued a notice ordering rectification and suspended the price increase before the procedure was improved.

We can only restrict from the aspect of price, and the property management department is responsible for the record of contract change of property service enterprises. The staff said that the price of the property after the rise did not exceed the governments guide price, but the procedure was against the rules. It was not mandatory to order the property to be rectified and could not fully restrict the property.

On November 1, the reporter of the Chinese business daily consulted the land department of Chanba Ecological District Management Committee on this matter. The staff said that they could only accept the interview after the approval of the publicity department. Then the reporter contacted Chanba Management Committee Publicity Department staff, the other side said after consulting the relevant business departments to give a reply, but as of the time of publication, no reply had been received.