Overseas network, Nov. 1 - recently, Luo Yinggan, executive member of the Hong Kong Bar Association, sent a letter in a radio program to beautify the mob and violence, blackening the Hong Kong SAR government and police law enforcement. However, the content of the letter was soon resented by his peers. A Hong Kong lawyer not only refuted the contents of Luo Yinggans letter one by one, but also denounced that his remarks to discredit the Hong Kong police were misleading.
On November 1, Hong Kong Wenhui reported that recently, Luo Yinggan, executive member of the Hong Kong Bar Association, published a letter in a radio program to beautify the violence of thugs and to discredit the Hong Kong SAR government and the police. On October 30, a lawyershk Hong Kong lawyer on the Facebook Page sent a reply, saying that Luo Yinggan, as a person with legal background, used his status to confuse the public It is very angry and regrettable to belittle the importance of law-abiding, not only beautify the crimes of thugs, but also evaluate the law enforcement of Hong Kong police.
As for Luo Yinggans comments on beautifying the violence of thugs and discrediting the Hong Kong SAR government and the Hong Kong Police, lawyers Hong Kong refuted one by one in the article.
For Luo Yinggans claim that young people in Hong Kong are seriously injured in the process of arrest, the lawyer said that if someone does not want to be injured, as long as they do not participate in any illegal activities, or stop illegal activities and leave immediately after the Hong Kong police warning, if the arrested person struggles or resists by force in the process of police arrest, then it can be said that the point of injury is no more normal. Whats more, what Luo Yinggan didnt point out is that the most fundamental cause of the conflict is the unbridled violent activities initiated by the thugs. The thugs in Hong Kong insist on participating in illegal activities happily and blame the police for abusing violence after being injured. What is not irresponsibility and hypocrisy? The restraint of the Hong Kong Police in law enforcement is obvious to all Hong Kong citizens, and there are not a few wounded in the Hong Kong police. Luo Yinggans questioning of the Hong Kong Polices remarks is obviously based on generality, impersonating rational analysis with personal political orientation, ignoring the bottom line of legal principle, which is hard to believe.
In response to Luo Yinggans claim that the thugs are willing to sacrifice their lives for democracy and freedom and change injustice, the lawyer said frankly that in his eyes and Hong Kong people, he only saw masked thugs who were trying to evade legal responsibility, destroying and beating different opinions everywhere, the thugs sacrificed other peoples property; they destroyed other peoples freedom.
The article emphasizes that in all violent incidents, the perpetrators are thugs. Thugs set fire everywhere, destroyed public property, demolished roads and railings, destroyed traffic lights, beat and imprison Hong Kong citizens with different opinions, resulting in many citizens freedom being restricted. The acts of these thugs have already exceeded the bottom line of Jurisprudence, and even beyond the bottom line of moral conscience. What have Hong Kong citizens done wrong? Whose democratic freedom are these thugs clamoring for? They are not changing injustice at all, they are creating it.
At the end of the article, the lawyer pointed out that as a person with legal background, Luo Yinggan used his status to mislead the public, fake rational analysis with personal political orientation, beautify the crime of thugs, and smear the law enforcement of the Hong Kong SAR government and the Hong Kong police. Any person with conscience and judgment ability will not accept the abusive speech of this reason.
As for the lawyers action, netizens voiced their support: thank you, justice lawyer of Hong Kong, for your voice without fear of evil forces. Its all in our heart that we have a clear rationale and a strong voice.
Conscientious people speak with sonorous words. I admire the analysis of the whole article. Thank you for rekindling our hope for Hong Kong.