Nanning serial murder cases final trial 6 defendants were punished! Not guilty of insufficient evidence

category:Hot
 Nanning serial murder cases final trial 6 defendants were punished! Not guilty of insufficient evidence


Two million hired murderers were subcontracted layer by layer, and the court finally judged six people guilty of intentional homicide.

On the morning of October 17, Nanning intermediate peoples Court issued a final judgment on the protest cases of Qin Youhui, Xi Guangan, Yang Kangsheng, Yang Guangsheng, Mo Tianxiang and Ling Xian for intentional homicide.

According to the trial of Nanning intermediate court, in August 2012, Qin Youhui, the defendant, signed an agreement with He Mou to transfer money to He Mou so as to invest and share in Guangxi real estate Co., Ltd. and Nanning Real Estate Co., Ltd. In 2013, the victim Wei and the two companies filed a civil lawsuit against the two companies due to disputes arising from the cooperative development of real estate.

In October 2013, Qin Youhui asked Xi Guangan, the defendant, to hire a killer to kill Wei because he was worried about the loss of his investment in Guangxi real estate Co., Ltd. and Nanning Real Estate Co., Ltd. Xi Guangan finds the defendant Mo Tianxiang and specifically deals with the murder of Wei.

Later, Qin Youhui provides Xi Guangan with a copy of Weis ID card, telephone number, license plate number, etc., and Xi Guangan provides Mo Tianxiang with the above information. Qin Youhui and Xi Guangan plan to use 2 million yuan as the reward for employing murderers. Qin Youhui gives 2 million yuan in cash to Xi Guangan in Litang Town, Binyang County as the reward for killing people. Xi Guangan then gives another 1 million yuan to Mo Tianxiang.

In April 2014, Xi Guangan proposed to Qin Youhui that an additional 1 million yuan of homicide remuneration should be paid, and Qin Youhui agreed and promised to pay it after success. In the same month, Mo Tianxiang hired Yang Kangsheng, the defendant, to handle the killing of Wei, and gave him 270000 yuan, a white mobile phone with a picture of Wei, a note with a license plate number and a white background photo of Wei. He promised to give 500000 yuan after the event.

After that, Yang Guangsheng hired Ling Xiansi, the defendant, to kill Wei, and promised to give Ling Xiansi 100000 yuan after the success. Lingxian four promised to kill Wei. Yang Guangsheng gave Lingxian four the items containing Weis information.

Unexpectedly, Lingxian four later repented and decided to give up killing Wei.

On April 28, 2014, Ling Xiansi contacted Wei by leaving a note. The two sides agreed to meet at a coffee shop in Qingxiu District of Nanning city by phone. Ling Xiansi told Wei that someone had invested 100000 yuan to kill him, and asked Wei to take a picture of his hand being tied back, saying that it was used for the exchange of business with the previous family, and then gave Wei a white mobile phone with a picture of Wei.

On October 17, Nanning intermediate peoples Court issued a final judgment on the four cases of protest against intentional homicide committed by Qin Youhui, Xi Guangan, Yang Kangsheng, Yang Guangsheng, Mo Tianxiang and Ling Xian.

According to the court, six defendants in the original trial intentionally and illegally deprived other peoples lives and their actions have constituted the crime of intentional homicide. According to the facts, nature, circumstances and social harm of the above six defendants, they were sentenced to five years imprisonment for Qin Youhui, three years and six months imprisonment for Xi Guangan, three years and three months imprisonment for Yang Kangsheng and Yang Guangsheng, three years and three years imprisonment for Mo Tianxiang and Ling Xiansi according to law. Two years and seven months in prison.

The defendant was found not guilty in court and the prosecution protested twice

Nandu previously reported that Mr. Wei called the police in 2014 when he found that a serial hired murderer wanted to kill him. Five suspects were arrested one after another. However, the originally settled case was overturned by the court. On April 28, 2016, the first instance of Qingxiu District Peoples court broke the evidence chain with unclear facts and insufficient evidence, and 5 people were acquitted.

Even if some suspects plead guilty in court, many evidences are not accepted. After the sentencing, Qingxiu District procuratorate protested, and the case was dismissed as the first trial decision due to unclear facts and insufficient evidence, and sent back for retrial. On January 23, 2017, Qingxiu District Court retrialed and filed the case. On March 10 of the same year, Qingxiu District procuratorate added charges against Ling for intentional homicide to the court.

The retrial was held on May 3, 2018, and 6 defendants turned over their confessions in turn. At the adjournment of the hearing on June 5, the defenders of the six defendants said that they were only kidnapping and extorting money, and had no intention of taking lives.

On December 29, 2018, the peoples Court of Qingxiu district held a court session and sentenced six defendants to be innocent on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence and the alleged crime could not be established. The court held that the evidence presented by the public prosecution did not form a complete chain of evidence, did not meet the legal standards for the authenticity and sufficiency of the evidence, and could not reach the only conclusion that six defendants intentionally killed people.

There has been a lot of attention to the case being remanded after the first trial, but I am disappointed to reiterate the judgment. Mr. Wei, who was killed by a hired murderer, said on January 12 that he believed the court had misunderstood the standard of proof in criminal proceedings.

On January 3, Mr. Wei requested the Qingxiu District Peoples Procuratorate of Nanning city to appeal the retrial judgment of the case. After the trial, the procuratorate found that the conditions for protest were met, and on January 8, the protest was filed.

On June 3, the case opened in the second instance of Nanning intermediate court. Behind the Procuratorates second protest, the two parties have different opinions on the exclusion of illegal evidence collection. The court questions whether the evidence submitted by the prosecution is obtained legally, which leads to many disputes in the case. The prosecution charged that the facts of the intentional homicide committed by the six defendants are clear and the evidence is indeed sufficient, so the criminal responsibility of the six defendants should be investigated for the intentional homicide. The first trial of the Court adopted the wrong evidence, which led to the application of legal errors in determining the facts. It is obviously improper to acquit the six defendants of the original trial, and the court is expected to correct it according to law. In the face of the prosecution charges, all six defendants denied it, saying it was not killing but arresting. Nanning intermediate court did not pronounce the sentence in court. After the trial, Mr. Wei, the party who was killed by the hired murderer, responded to the Nandu reporter on June 5, saying that the prosecutors office would only prosecute again if it believed that the evidence held by the public security organ constituted a crime. On October 17, Nanning intermediate court pronounced a final judgment on the protest case of intentional homicide. Six defendants were convicted of intentional homicide and sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of two years, six months and five years for six defendants in the original trial. Taking and writing: Zhang Yating, reporter of Nandu

On June 3, the case opened in the second instance of Nanning intermediate court. Behind the Procuratorates second protest, the two parties have different opinions on the exclusion of illegal evidence collection. The court questions whether the evidence submitted by the prosecution is obtained legally, which leads to many disputes in the case. The prosecution charged that the facts of the intentional homicide committed by the six defendants are clear and the evidence is indeed sufficient, so the criminal responsibility of the six defendants should be investigated for the intentional homicide. The first trial of the Court adopted the wrong evidence, which led to the application of legal errors in determining the facts. It is obviously improper to acquit the six defendants of the original trial, and the court is expected to correct it according to law.

In the face of the prosecution charges, all six defendants denied it, saying it was not killing but arresting. Nanning intermediate court did not pronounce the sentence in court. After the trial, Mr. Wei, the party who was killed by the hired murderer, responded to the Nandu reporter on June 5, saying that the prosecutors office would only prosecute again if it believed that the evidence held by the public security organ constituted a crime.

On October 17, Nanning intermediate court pronounced a final judgment on the protest case of intentional homicide. Six defendants were convicted of intentional homicide and sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of two years, six months and five years for six defendants in the original trial.

Taking and writing: Zhang Yating, reporter of Nandu