A man in Yueyang was convicted of drunkenly teasing his wife with vulgar language and beating them with machetes.

category:Hot
 A man in Yueyang was convicted of drunkenly teasing his wife with vulgar language and beating them with machetes.


(function() {(window. Slotbydup = window. Slotbydup| []). Push ({ID: 6374560, container: ssp_, size: 300250, display: inlay fix, async: true});)))); after hearing, the court held that the defendant Li Mou defied the national law and social public order and actively provoked conflicts. The first respondent Li Mou, Zhao Mou, Ji Mou and the defendant Peng Mou, Liang Mou and Yu The fugitive Liang * and others engaged in armed assault in public places. The acts of the defendants Li Mou, Zhao Mou, Li Mou, Peng Mou, Liang Mou and Ji Mou have constituted the crime of mass assault. The criminal responsibility of the six defendants should be investigated for the crime of mass assault. The case belongs to a joint crime. The defendants, Li Mou and Peng Mou, are the main elements. The defendants, Liang Mou, Li Mou, Zhao Mou and Ji Mou, are active participants. The defendants, Liang Mou, Li Mou and Zhao Mou, all play the main roles in the joint crime and are the principal offenders. The defendant Ji Mou plays a minor role in the joint crime and is an accomplice. The punishment for Ji Mou can be mitigated according to law. At the same time, the defendant, Li Mou, provoked incidents on his own initiative and severely punished him as appropriate. After the accused Li Mou, Peng Mou and Liang Mou commit crimes, they voluntarily surrender to the public security organs, and confess their criminal facts truthfully after the case and in court, which belongs to voluntary surrender; the accused Zhao Mou, Li Mou and Ji Mou can confess their crimes truthfully after the case arrives, which belongs to confession, and the six accused can be given light or mitigated punishment according to law. In the light of the above circumstances, the court rendered the above judgment. (Hunan Court Network) Source of this article: Responsible Editor of Hunan Court Network: Wang Xiaoyi_NE0011

After trial, the court held that the defendant Li Mou openly flouted the national law and social public order, provoked contradictions on his own initiative, and for the first time invited the defendant Li Mou, Zhao Mou, Ji Mou and the defendant Peng Mou to gather together, Liang Mou, the fugitive Liang X and others to engage in armed assault in public places. The acts of the defendant Li Mou, Zhao Mou, Li Mou, Peng Mou, Liang Mou and Ji Mou have constituted the crime of gathering people to fight. Six defendants shall be investigated for criminal responsibility for the crime of gathering together to fight. The case belongs to a joint crime. The defendants, Li Mou and Peng Mou, are the main elements. The defendants, Liang Mou, Li Mou, Zhao Mou and Ji Mou, are active participants. The defendants, Liang Mou, Li Mou and Zhao Mou, all play the main roles in the joint crime and are the principal offenders. The defendant Ji Mou plays a minor role in the joint crime and is an accomplice. The punishment for Ji Mou can be mitigated according to law. At the same time, the defendant, Li Mou, provoked incidents on his own initiative and severely punished him as appropriate. After the accused Li Mou, Peng Mou and Liang Mou commit crimes, they voluntarily surrender to the public security organs, and confess their criminal facts truthfully after the case and in court, which belongs to voluntary surrender; the accused Zhao Mou, Li Mou and Ji Mou can confess their crimes truthfully after the case arrives, which belongs to confession, and the six accused can be given light or mitigated punishment according to law. In the light of the above circumstances, the court rendered the above judgment. (Hunan Court Network)